Monthly Archives: July 2009
Roseanne Barr Dressed As Hitler Bakes Burnt ‘Jew Cookies’
As NewsBusters has chronicled over the years, Roseanne Barr has a history of doing and saying some truly disgraceful things, but this one really takes the cake… or the cookie in this case.
Her most-recent tailspin into the gutter involved a photo shoot with Heeb magazine wherein she is seen wearing an Adolf Hitler moustache and swastika as she takes burnt gingerbread “Jew Cookies” out of an oven.
In another, in same costume, she is shown about to take a bite out of one of these burnt cookies.
The article associated with these disgusting pictures claimed:
As the “Domestic Goddess” dons the famous moustache, transforming into “Domestic Goddess Hitler,” I notice that she’s beginning to have fun. She nails the Fuehrer’s facial expressions with twisted glee, and as she takes the burnt gingerbread “Jew Cookies” out of the oven it occurs to me that Barr may be the last celebrity utterly incapable of giving a f**k—a quality theoretically easy to embody until it’s time to face the practical repercussions.
The latest addition to the scrap heap of failed Liberal ideas?
Cash for Clunkers! Well, now, I guess more stimlulus finds can go to this!
The National Endowment for the Arts may be spending some of the money it received from the Recovery and Reinvestment Act to fund nude simulated-sex dances, Saturday night “pervert” revues and the airing of pornographic horror films at art houses in San Francisco.
The NEA was given $80 million of the government’s $787 billion economic stimulus bill to spread around to needy artists nationwide, and most of the money is being spent to help preserve jobs in museums, orchestras, theaters and dance troupes that have been hit hard by the recession.
Look, if they ARE going to spens tax dolars on porn, at least make it good porn! Maybe even an educational video about what attracts RINOS like George “Screw those Southerners” Voinovich.
As a bonus, I offer up a baby picture of Lindsay Graham!
Why does Stacy McCain hate West Virginia women?
That guy I tell ya. Always starting trouble
Ask any resident of Kentucky or Maryland about the “butterface” women of the Mountaineer State. Sports reporters dread the day they are assigned to cover a game at WVU, where the cheerleaders are known as “The Two-Bagger Squad.”
Even among Pennsylvanians — who have foisted upon an unwilling world a disproportionate number of those heinous women known locally as “Pittsburgh Bridge Trolls” — there is this common saying: “Just because she’s ugly, doesn’t necessarily mean she’s from West Virginia.”
Should Don Surber wish to provide photographic evidence of a West Virginia woman who is not a poster girl for birth control, he is welcome to do so. Otherwise, I can only refer him to the Ohioans, who universally agree that West Virginia women make even the coyote-ugly girls of Toledo look “sexy” by comparison.
No need, of course, to mention the proverbial advice commonly given to desperate and unattractive men in Charlottesville, Staunton and other parts of the Old Dominion: “Either go gay or go to W-V-A.” (Which most folks in Richmond consider to be less strictly a comment on the looks of West Virginia women than an allusion to their infamous promiscuity.)
Personally, I have no dog, no pun intended, in this fight, but, I can however, correct Stacy McCain on where the ugliest women reside, or rather where they can be found. Just look at any Code Pink rally, or any other gathering where rabid Leftist women gather to protest everything!
And of course, I can also attest to where the MOST beautiful women are, look on any South Eastern Conference football game, the women there LOVE their football, and are smokin hot! Especially the lovely Gator Girls!
Racist huh?
It is not shocking, not at all, that many on the “enlightened, progressive, non-judgemental” Left chalk any criticism of President Obama’s policies up to racism. This is a strategy that has worked for them for years. Rather than debating ideals, or policy, they just pull out their handy dandy deck of “cards” race cards, gender cards, absolute moral authority cards, extremists cards, etc.
Seeking to win political arguments with hyperbole, and emotionalism, they prefer to assassinate the character of those who hold differing views, than to engage them intellectually. Of course, since Liberals do not generally hold the advantage of superior ideological positions, their strategy is not surprising is it?
I have long held that we, as Conservatives, should not play the Leftist’s game. So, in putting into practice what I preach, I offer up a brilliant Conservative, and his explanation of why the problems with our economy, are TOO MUCH, rather than TOO LITTLE government! Via Wolf Howling
Did she say Aplomb?
Good post at Carol’s Closet but, I must say, I am more impressed with Carol’s use of the word APLOMB
Thanks to Stacy McCain
I am his featured reach around link, and I am very grateful for the honor
THE DALEY GATOR
This spot rotates to honor those who link us in shameless obedience to Rule 2 of How to Get a Million Hits on Your Blog.)
Blog Wars?
I am glad I am not involved in this, and would advise those who ARE involved to stand down, we have more important things to do that kicking each other in the nads!
Bill Maher: Douchebaggery!
Maher is many things. He is a comedian who generally is not funny. He is a man who pretends to be wise, yet is stupid. He is a man who bemoans religion, yet engages in the same intolerance towards believers, that he claims they practice.
Most of all though, Maher is just pathetic!
Oh those nutty Czars!
They can be so much fun at parties, I mean they will say the damndest things!
President Obama’s top science adviser, John P. Holdren, advocated the “de-development” of the United States in books he published in the 1970s.
“A massive campaign must be launched to restore a high-quality environment in North America and to de-develop the United States,” Holdren wrote in a 1973 book he co-authored with Paul R. Ehrlch and Anne H. Ehrlich. “De-development means bringing our economic system (especially patterns of consumption) into line with the realities of ecology and the global resource situation.”
In the vision expressed by Holdren and his co-authors, the Ehrlichs, the need for “de-development” of the United States demanded a redistribtuion of wealth.
“The need for de-development presents our economists with a major challenge,” they wrote. “They must design a stable, low-consumption economy in which there is a much more equitable distribution of wealth than in the present one. Redistribution of wealth both within and among nations is absolutely essential, if a decent life is to be provided to every human being.”
Oh, what a barrel of laughs that guy is. You should hear him after a couple of martinis!
Michelle Malkin on Glenn Beck!
She has the #1 book on Amazon, and I just picked my copy up today, I showed it to a friend, who, is now so engossed in it I cannot get it back. So, I guess I will wait my turn to read my book. Video via Hot Air
More global warming please!
Women getting hotter! Of course Suzanne Logan could not get much hotter! Just something about a woman who makes cookies with her feet!
While counting down the hours to the Bachelorette finale tonight (sure to be “the most dramatic rose ceremony” evah!), digging cookie dough out from under my toe nails (don’t ask), and avoiding work like Barry O. avoids common sense (that is, uncommonly well), I came across this:
Psychologists believe women are becoming more attractive … Men meanwhile apparently remain as aesthetically unappealing as their caveman ancestors. Read more: here.
Why you should fear ObamaCare
This should scare the living Hell out of you!
Start with Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, the brother of White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel. He has already been appointed to two key positions: health-policy adviser at the Office of Management and Budget and a member of Federal Council on Comparative Effectiveness Research.
Emanuel bluntly admits that the cuts will not be pain-free. “Vague promises of savings from cutting waste, enhancing prevention and wellness, installing electronic medical records and improving quality are merely ‘lipstick’ cost control, more for show and public relations than for true change,” he wrote last year (Health Affairs Feb. 27, 2008).
Savings, he writes, will require changing how doctors think about their patients: Doctors take the Hippocratic Oath too seriously, “as an imperative to do everything for the patient regardless of the cost or effects on others” (Journal of the American Medical Association, June 18, 2008).
Yes, that’s what patients want their doctors to do. But Emanuel wants doctors to look beyond the needs of their patients and consider social justice, such as whether the money could be better spent on somebody else.
Many doctors are horrified by this notion; they’ll tell you that a doctor’s job is to achieve social justice one patient at a time.
Emanuel, however, believes that “communitarianism” should guide decisions on who gets care. He says medical care should be reserved for the non-disabled, not given to those “who are irreversibly prevented from being or becoming participating citizens . . . An obvious example is not guaranteeing health services to patients with dementia” (Hastings Center Report, Nov.-Dec. ’96).
Translation: Don’t give much care to a grandmother with Parkinson’s or a child with cerebral palsy.
He explicitly defends discrimination against older patients: “Unlike allocation by sex or race, allocation by age is not invidious discrimination; every person lives through different life stages rather than being a single age. Even if 25-year-olds receive priority over 65-year-olds, everyone who is 65 years now was previously 25 years” (Lancet, Jan. 31).
Oh no, not another case of…………
In light of the catastrophic consequences it will inevitably have regarding the cost, quality, and accessibility of healthcare, ObamaCare is no laughing matter. But that’s not why a doctor got in big trouble for passing along this harmless and widely circulated joke:
Gatordoug
darcprynce
Dave C
