Washington Rebel has the scoop
Mike, of the Classic Liberal fields this question
A lot of the controversy over the war, particularly in Iraq, stems from the fact that our actions were pre-emptive. With respect to pre-emptive military action, please explain what you consider an acceptable threshold for American action. For example: Should we wait until an attack has been launched but not yet struck (re: Paul) before acting? Should we act when we have “reasonable suspicion” that another country or entity is actively planning violence against us? Should we act against any state or nation that we know wishes to cause us harm, before they have the opportunity to organize an act of violence against us?
Where do we draw that “line in the sand”?
Read his answer, then check out Russ of That’s Right and his response
Fascinating and intellectually stimulating debate. Hats off to both sides, nice job! be sure to read all of their answers