Monthly Archives: December 2010
Daily Benefactor News – House GOP: Bills Will Have To Cite Constitution
…………
————————— CLICK HERE TO VISIT THE DAILY BENEFACTOR —————————
————————————————————- TOP STORY ————————————————————-
House GOP: Bills Will Have To Cite Constitution – Politico
Fulfilling one of their most prominent campaign promises, House Republican leaders have unveiled a new rule to require that each bill filed in the House “cite its specific constitutional authority.”
And for those who may have skipped that constitutional law class, Republicans have organized four staff briefings prior to the Jan. 5 start of the 112th Congress to provide guidance on compliance with the new rule. The first session will be Monday at 1 p.m. in the Capitol Visitor Center.
GOP leaders have prepared a memo for all members of the new Congress and senior staff informing them that no bill may be introduced unless the sponsor has submitted for the Congressional Record a statement “citing as specifically as practicable the power or powers granted to Congress” to enact the measure. The memo included five examples of forms that sponsors could include with their legislation.
And the memo warned that any bill that is filed without the requisite “constitutional authority statement” will not be accepted by the House clerk and will be returned to the sponsor. Such a statement, House Republicans added in a Friday statement, “also demonstrates to the American people that we in Congress understand that we have an obligation under our founding document to stay within the role established therein for the legislative branch.”
Although some members – especially Democrats who didn’t sign the campaign promise – might find the new rule burdensome, its practical effect on legislation in the new Congress likely will be limited.
Presumably, the new GOP leaders and committee heads will not be sending bills to the House floor unless they consider them constitutional. As is the case every two years, all members will take an oath of office on Jan. 5 to support the founding document.
“When there is pushback [to the constitutionality of a bill], we will allow debate on the House floor,” said Utah Rep. Rob Bishop, who headed a working group of the House GOP transition team that prepared the new procedure.
————————————————————————————————————————————————
—————————————————– NOTE TO READERS ——————————————————
THE DAILY BENEFACTOR now provides you with a large selection of NEWS WIDGETS containing RSS feeds from the most comprehensive news sources on the internet, such as THE DRUDGE REPORT, GATEWAY PUNDIT, THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER, WORLDNETDAILY, POLITICO, THE WALL STREET JOURNAL, CNS, MICHELLE MALKIN, BREITBART, and THE JERUSALEM POST. Check them out!
————————————————————————————————————————————————
Daily Benefactor News – Gaping Holes In Airline Security: Loaded Gun Slips Past TSA Screeners
…………
————————— CLICK HERE TO VISIT THE DAILY BENEFACTOR —————————
————————————————————- TOP STORY ————————————————————-
Gaping Holes In Airline Security: Loaded Gun Slips Past TSA Screeners – ABC News
Last fall, as he had done hundreds of times, Iranian-American businessman Farid Seif passed through security at a Houston airport and boarded an international flight.
He didn’t realize he had forgotten to remove the loaded snub nose “baby” Glock pistol from his computer bag. But TSA officers never noticed as his bag glided along the belt and was x-rayed. When he got to his hotel after the three-hour flight, he was shocked to discover the gun traveled unnoticed from Houston.
“It’s just impossible to miss it, you know. I mean, this is not a small gun,” Seif told ABC News. “How can you miss it? You cannot miss it.”
But the TSA did miss it, and despite what most people believe about the painstaking effort to screen airline passengers and their luggage before they enter the terminal, it was not that unusual.
Experts tell ABC News that every year since the September 11 terror attacks, federal agencies have conducted random, covert “red team tests,” where undercover agents try to see just how much they can get past security checks at major U.S. airports. And while the Department of Homeland Security closely guards the results as classified, those that have leaked in media reports have been shocking.
According to one report, undercover TSA agents testing security at a Newark airport terminal on one day in 2006 found that TSA screeners failed to detect concealed bombs and guns 20 out of 22 times. A 2007 government audit leaked to USA Today revealed that undercover agents were successful slipping simulated explosives and bomb parts through Los Angeles’s LAX airport in 50 out of 70 attempts, and at Chicago’s O’Hare airport agents made 75 attempts and succeeded in getting through undetected 45 times.
Despite the results, there is no sign that the numbers have changed as the screeners have been tested year after year, former Department of Homeland Security Inspector General Clark Kent Ervin told ABC News.
“Those reports were classified but it’s sufficing to say that reports, both classified and unclassified, are concerning. Too often guns and knives and fake explosives get through the checkpoint,” Ervin said. “And what is particularly concerning is that nine times out of 10 the checkpoint is the most critical layer of aviation security.”
Ervin said a combination of factors is likely to blame for the persistent failures on the part of screeners. Low pay, poor training, and the monotony involved in watching bags pass through x-ray machines are a recipe for trouble, Ervin said.
“To be fair to screeners, it’s very difficult work,” he said. “After so many hours of seeing things that are innocuous, there’s really a limit for the human brain to process something anomalous.”
Last month, TSA Chief John Pistole told ABC News that the poor performance during undercover tests helped convince him that airport screening needed to get that much tougher – and a desire to do better helped give rise to the controversial new regimen that includes enhanced pat-downs and back-scatter machines that can see beneath a traveler’s clothing.
————————————————————————————————————————————————
—————————————————– NOTE TO READERS ——————————————————
THE DAILY BENEFACTOR now provides you with a large selection of NEWS WIDGETS containing RSS feeds from the most comprehensive news sources on the internet, such as THE DRUDGE REPORT, GATEWAY PUNDIT, THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER, WORLDNETDAILY, POLITICO, THE WALL STREET JOURNAL, CNS, MICHELLE MALKIN, BREITBART, and THE JERUSALEM POST. Check them out!
————————————————————————————————————————————————
Daily Benefactor News – Dems Are Earmark Junkies But GOP Goes Straight
…………
————————— CLICK HERE TO VISIT THE DAILY BENEFACTOR —————————
————————————————————- TOP STORY ————————————————————-
Dems Are Earmark Junkies But GOP Goes Straight – Washington Examiner
Press coverage of the budget frenzy on Capitol Hill has suggested that pork-barrel earmark spending is still a bipartisan problem, that after months of self-righteous rhetoric about fiscal discipline, Republicans and Democrats remain equal-opportunity earmarkers.
It’s not true. A new analysis by a group of federal-spending watchdogs shows a striking imbalance between the parties when it comes to earmark requests. Democrats remain raging spenders, while Republicans have made enormous strides in cleaning up their act. In the Senate, the GOP made only one-third as many earmark requests as Democrats for 2011, and in the House, Republicans have nearly given up earmarking altogether – while Democrats roll on.
The watchdog groups – Taxpayers for Common Sense, WashingtonWatch.com, and Taxpayers Against Earmarks – counted total earmark requests in the 2011 budget. Those requests were made by lawmakers earlier this year, but Democratic leaders, afraid that their party’s spending priorities might cost them at the polls, decided not to pass a budget before the Nov. 2 elections. This week, they distilled those earmark requests – threw some out, combined others – into the omnibus bill that was under consideration in the Senate until Majority Leader Harry Reid pulled it Thursday night. While that bill was loaded with spending, looking back at the original earmark requests tells us a lot about the spending inclinations of both parties.
In the 2011 House budget, the groups found that House Democrats requested 18,189 earmarks, which would cost the taxpayers a total of $51.7 billion, while House Republicans requested just 241 earmarks, for a total of $1 billion.
Where did those GOP earmark requests come from? Just four Republican lawmakers: South Carolina Rep. Henry Brown, who did not run for re-election this year; Louisiana Rep. Joseph Cao, who lost his bid for re-election; maverick Texas Rep. Ron Paul; and spending king Rep. Don Young of Alaska. The other Republican members of the House – 174 of them – requested a total of zero earmarks.
Talk to Republicans, and they’ll say it would be nice if there were no earmark requests at all, but party leaders can’t control everybody. “Brown’s retiring, Cao’s defeated, Paul is Paul and Young is Young,” one GOP aide shrugs. Still, the bottom line is that the House GOP’s nearly perfect renunciation of earmarks is striking. “For a voluntary moratorium, it was impressive that there were only four scofflaws,” says Steve Ellis of Taxpayers for Common Sense.
The Senate is a different story. But even though some Republicans are still seeking earmarks, Democrats are by far the bigger spenders. The watchdog groups found that Democrats requested 15,133 earmarks for 2011, for a total of $54.9 billion, while Republicans requested 5,352 earmarks, for a total of $22 billion.
If you look at the top 10 Senate earmarkers as measured by the total dollar value of earmarks requested, there are seven Democrats and three Republicans. (The leader of the pack is Democratic Sen. Mary Landrieu, who requested $4.4 billion in earmarks.) The three Republicans are Sens. Roger Wicker, Sam Brownback and Thad Cochran. One of them, Brownback, is leaving the Senate, while the other two are from Mississippi, which is apparently earmark heaven.
Go down the list a bit more and the party differences are just as clear. Of the top 50 earmarkers in the Senate, 38 are Democrats and 12 are Republicans. And at the bottom of the list, you’ll find that the lawmakers who requested few earmarks for relatively small amounts of money are mostly Republicans. And, of course, the senators who have sworn off earmarks entirely (and are trying to convince the rest of the Senate to go along) are Republicans, too.
You’d think that President Obama would be siding with those lawmakers, both House and Senate, in the fight against earmarks. “I agree with those Republican and Democratic members of Congress who’ve recently said that in these challenging days, we can’t afford what are called earmarks,” the president said in his Nov. 13 radio address. Instead, Obama pushed the Senate to approve the earmark-laden Democratic spending bill.
No matter. The story of earmarks in the past year is one of Republican self-improvement. The party that wallowed in earmark spending in the past decade is trying to reform itself. In the House especially, their efforts have led to notable success, but they’re making progress in the Senate, too. Perhaps the reforms will be temporary – beginning next year, Republicans will control the House and feel all the temptations of power – but so far, it’s a remarkable accomplishment.
————————————————————————————————————————————————
—————————————————– NOTE TO READERS ——————————————————
THE DAILY BENEFACTOR now provides you with a large selection of NEWS WIDGETS containing RSS feeds from the most comprehensive news sources on the internet, such as THE DRUDGE REPORT, GATEWAY PUNDIT, THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER, WORLDNETDAILY, POLITICO, THE WALL STREET JOURNAL, CNS, MICHELLE MALKIN, BREITBART, and THE JERUSALEM POST. Check them out!
————————————————————————————————————————————————
Daily Benefactor News – GOP Manages To Stop Lame-Duck Democrats From Shoving $1.2T Spending Bill Down America’s Throat
…………
————————— CLICK HERE TO VISIT THE DAILY BENEFACTOR —————————
————————————————————- TOP STORY ————————————————————-
A $1.2 trillion “omnibus” spending bill loaded with thousands of lawmakers’ pet projects known as earmarks is dead in the U.S. Senate after the chamber’s top Democrat conceded that he didn’t have the votes to overcome Republican opposition.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada said yesterday that he was abandoning the measure after several Republicans he had been counting on withdrew their support of the plan to fund the government through Sept. 30, 2011. He said he would work with Republicans to write a shorter-term funding bill, known as a continuing resolution, in its place.
Reid said the Senate would also take test votes tomorrow on legislation to repeal the “don’t ask, don’t tell” ban on gays serving opening in the military, as well as a measure that would grant legal status to some younger illegal immigrants.
The House passed a “don’t ask, don’t tell” repeal bill Dec. 15. The immigration legislation, called the DREAM Act, would allow people who came to the U.S. illegally before age 16 and remained for at least five years to gain legal residency after completing two years of college or military service. The House passed it on Dec. 9.
The decision to kill the omnibus measure was a key victory for Republicans, who lined up against the legislation even though most had used it to secure funding for projects in their home states. Republican complaints included the time they were given to consider the 1,924-page measure, which was introduced Dec. 14.
Reid “doesn’t have the votes, and the reason he doesn’t have the votes is because members on this side of the aisle increasingly felt concerned about the way we do business,” said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, a Kentucky Republican.
“For many of our members, it was not so much the substance of the bill but the process” that spurred opposition, he said.
Critics of earmarks hailed the bill’s defeat. “This is a great, great victory for the American people,” said Senator John McCain, an Arizona Republican. “I want to thank those that made the calls, those that sent e-mails, those that stood up and called into the talk shows all over America and said, ‘We’ve had enough.’”
Democrats, who control the Senate with 58 votes, needed to pick up the support of at least three Republicans to overcome stalling tactics after Senator Claire McCaskill, a Missouri Democrat, announced her opposition to the bill.
Utah Republican Senator Bob Bennett had announced he would support the measure, while Ohio Republican George Voinovich had said he was leaning toward backing it. Both lawmakers leave office when the new Congress convenes in early January.
Reid said that though he had been counting on support from as many as nine Republicans, “in the last 24 hours, they’ve walked away.”
The resolution currently funding government on a temporary basis expires tomorrow. Reid yesterday didn’t reveal the duration of the new resolution being crafted.
————————————————————————————————————————————————
—————————————————– NOTE TO READERS ——————————————————
THE DAILY BENEFACTOR now provides you with a large selection of NEWS WIDGETS containing RSS feeds from the most comprehensive news sources on the internet, such as THE DRUDGE REPORT, GATEWAY PUNDIT, THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER, WORLDNETDAILY, POLITICO, THE WALL STREET JOURNAL, CNS, MICHELLE MALKIN, BREITBART, and THE JERUSALEM POST. Check them out!
————————————————————————————————————————————————
Ed Picks The Winners Of The College Football Bowl Games That Actually Matter
January 1st
Rose Bowl: Wisconsin (11-1) vs. Texas Christian (12-0)
Texas Christian
January 3rd
Orange Bowl: Stanford (11-1) vs. Virginia Tech (11-2)
Stanford
January 4th
Sugar Bowl: Ohio State (11-1) vs. Arkansas (10-2)
Arkansas
January 7th
Cotton Bowl: Louisiana State (10-2) vs. Texas A&M (9-3)
Louisiana State
January 10th
BCS National Championship: Oregon (12-0) vs. Auburn (13-0)
Auburn
GOP Will Paralyze Senate Floor With Reading Of 1,924-Page Spending Bill
GOP Will Paralyze Senate Floor With Reading Of 1,924-Page Spending Bill – The Hill
Republicans will paralyze the Senate floor for 50 hours by forcing clerks to read every single paragraph of the 1,924-page, $1.1 trillion omnibus spending bill.
Senate clerks are expected to read the massive bill in rotating shifts around the clock – taking breaks to drink water and pop throat lozenges – to keep legislative business on track, according to a Democratic leadership aide.
The bill is so long that it took the Government Printing Office two days to print it.
The Senate is currently debating the New START nuclear arms reduction treaty. It is expected to take up the omnibus spending bill on a separate and parallel track later Thursday.
If Republicans follow through on their threat, legislative business couldn’t resume until late Saturday in order to give the staff enough time to read the bill aloud, according to a Democratic leadership estimate.
Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.), the Senate Republican Steering Committee chairman, vowed not to back down.
“If they bring this up, they’re going to read it. It’ll take them a day or two to read it,” DeMint said on Fox News. “Again, we’re trying to run out the clock. They should not be able to pass this kind of legislation in a lame-duck Congress.”
Snow began blanketing the Capitol on Thursday and the forecast calls for more on Sunday, when the Senate is expected to be in session. It’s a scenario that recalls the hectic finish to the healthcare reform debate last year.
“Well, here we go again,” said Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.) on the Senate floor Thursday. “All of this is eerily familiar to anyone who remembers the healthcare debate. We’ve even got snow in the forecast — just like last year, when we voted on the healthcare bill in a blizzard.”
McConnell has offered as an alternative a one-page continuing resolution that would fund the government through Feb. 18 at current levels.
Meanwhile, Sen. Jon Kyl (Ariz.), the lead GOP negotiator on START ratification, argued the Senate should not be trying to rush the treaty and spending bill through the Senate simultaneously.
“To suggest that we can dual-track an issue as important as the funding of the government with this almost 2,000-page, $1 trillion-plus bill at the same time that we are seriously debating the START treaty is a fantasy,” Kyl told reporters Wednesday.
————————————————————————————————————————————————
Related Story:
Newt Urges GOP To Filibuster Omnibus Bill – Human Events
If Congress fails to pass a spending bill before Sunday, all non-essential portions of the federal government are effectively “shutdown.” Regardless, Newt Gingrich tells HUMAN EVENTS that Republicans must filibuster the Omnibus bill and not allow it to move in the Senate.
Republicans should offer to pass a “very clean, simple Continuing Resolution that keeps the government open.” The GOP shouldn’t budge, insists the former Speaker of the House. “This [past] election was in part over pork-barrel spending by earmarks” and the “Democrats are trying to behave as though the election didn’t occur.”
As reported by HUMAN EVENTS, Harry Reid’s Omnibus behemoth has 6,714 earmarks in it, totaling $8.3 billion, which would fund “pork” projects including the production of virus-free wine grapes, the monitoring of aquatic invasive species in the Columbia River Basin, the building solar parking canopies, and the harvesting of salmon.
Newt also favors the tax “compromise” arranged by Obama and GOP leaders, arguing that it’s a necessary bridge to avoid further economic malaise.
“If taxes go up on Jan. 1, you’re going to have an enormous mess in this country, and we’re already at 9.8 percent unemployment. . .
“Nobody should believe that a two-year extension of the current tax code is a stimulus. It’s a catastrophe avoidance; it’s a disaster avoidance, but it’s not a stimulus. In order to get this economy growing again, we need substantially more real permanent tax cuts that incentivize manufacturing, incentivize investment, [and] incentivize small business. Give people who create jobs a reason to go back out and create jobs.”
Daily Benefactor News – Federal Judge Rules Liberal Fish Study That Forced Officials To Cut Off California Water Was Based On Junk Science
…………
————————— CLICK HERE TO VISIT THE DAILY BENEFACTOR —————————
————————————————————- TOP STORY ————————————————————-
Oops!… Sorry about that mass unemployment and drought.
In December 2008, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service issued what is known as a “biological opinion” imposing water reductions on the San Joaquin Valley and environs to safeguard the federally protected hypomesus transpacificus, a.k.a., the delta smelt.
As a result, tens of billions of gallons of water from mountains east and north of Sacramento was channelled away from farmers and into the ocean, leaving hundreds of thousands of acres of arable land fallow or scorched.
Democrats created a dust bowl based on junk science.
A federal judge ruled on Tuesday that the liberal study that forced California officials to cutback on water to the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta was based on faulty science. SFGate reported:
A federal judge has ruled that a landmark 2008 environmental study laying the groundwork for controversial water cutbacks from the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta relied on faulty science.
In his much-anticipated decision released Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Oliver Wanger ordered the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to re-examine and rewrite its plan for the threatened delta smelt.
The agency’s solution for shoring up the collapsing species – namely cutting water exports to California cities and farms – is “arbitrary” and “capricious,” the Fresno judge wrote in his 225-page decision…
…Wanger’s ruling upheld the evidence showing that the delta pumps do indeed trap and kill many delta smelt – a consolation for environmental groups that had fought for pumping cutbacks. However, the judge found fundamental flaws in the scientific analysis on the benefits of trimming water supplies to urban and rural areas and said the federal agency failed to examine the economic impacts of such a policy.
Agricultural water districts, plaintiffs in the case and the most vocal critic of the 2008 Fish and Wildlife Service report – officially termed a “biological opinion” – were delighted with Tuesday’s decision.
“With the economy struggling and unemployment still soaring, it is welcome to see a judge refusing to rubber-stamp extreme, destructive and unjustified environmental regulations,” said Damien Schiff, attorney for the Pacific Legal Foundation, which backed several farmers in a lawsuit against the federal government. “Bottom line: The people win; junk science loses.”
————————————————————————————————————————————————
—————————————————– NOTE TO READERS ——————————————————
THE DAILY BENEFACTOR now provides you with a large selection of NEWS WIDGETS containing RSS feeds from the most comprehensive news sources on the internet, such as THE DRUDGE REPORT, GATEWAY PUNDIT, THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER, WORLDNETDAILY, POLITICO, THE WALL STREET JOURNAL, CNS, MICHELLE MALKIN, BREITBART, and THE JERUSALEM POST. Check them out!
————————————————————————————————————————————————
Daily Benefactor News – Emanuel Cleaver’s $48 Billion Earmark To Redistribute Wealth
…………
————————— CLICK HERE TO VISIT THE DAILY BENEFACTOR —————————
————————————————————- TOP STORY ————————————————————-
Emanuel Cleaver’s $48 Billion Earmark To Redistribute Wealth – Political Realities
No, the headline is not something I made up to catch your attention. It is an actual fact. In yesterday’s post, I talked about the enormous amount of earmark spending that was being Emanuel Cleaver requested and inserted into the omnibus spending bill coming up at the end of the year.
Harrison, of Capitol Commentary fame, pointed this out to me in his comment, so I wanted to touch on it just a bit. He got his information from Gateway Pundit. Can you believe that U.S. Representative Emanuel Cleaver of Missouri wants $48 billion in earmarks to help redistribute wealth in the inner cities?
It sounds crazy, but it’s true, just the same. Just so everyone knows who Cleaver is, do you remember the member of Congress who accused members of the Tea Party of spitting on him? Yeah, one and the same fellow.
Rep. Cleaver has proposed a $48 billion earmark When absurdity gives way to hilarity, you must be talking about politics.
In the midst of a colossal global concern for the economic stability of our great nation, Emanuel Cleaver, Missouri’s 5th Congressional District representative, has one small earmark on his wish list that deserves some attention.
Cleaver has listed a new earmark – one of several – and he promises to “fight for every one.” But this is a whopping $48 billion package that must go down as the grandaddy of all earmarks.
Proposed by a gentleman named Lamar Mickens, president of the not-for-profit Quality Day Campus, the $48 billion earmark would funnel money into the inner cities to give money to the poor and thereby produce a much larger consumer class to buy the goods and services produced in this country.
Just call this redistribution on steroids.
Cleaver’s office says this of the proposal:
“The Epicenter is a proposed estimated $48 billion (Phase One) mass scale urban reclamation project for combating, reducing, reversing and/or eliminating poverty within under served communities by utilizing mass scale economic redevelopment to bring about stability and self reliance.
At the risk of sounding like I just don’t want to help people who are less fortunate, doesn’t this Spread The Wealth border on the ridiculous? It’s bad enough that any earmarks are being inserted into this spending bill, but this really takes the cake.
Even though I disagree with Senator Jim Inhofe’s $44.7 million earmarks, this makes them look not so bad. And while I am on the subject, if this is just Phase One, how much is Phase Two going to cost the American taxpayer?
I know this may sound like I am still beating that dead horse, but when is this madness going to stop? How much longer must we continue to spend money, hand over fist, with very few of our representatives willing to stand up and tell the truth about the process. On top of that, we have this idiocy. $48 billion in order to funnel money into inner cities, trying to create a larger consumer class?
Wouldn’t it make more sense to change our policies and create a better climate for companies to grow and create jobs? Wouldn’t that allow these people an even better opportunity to pull themselves up by their bootstraps, rather than just handing them a fist full of dollars and say go buy stuff? Is it any wonder we are going broke as a country?
————————————————————————————————————————————————
—————————————————– NOTE TO READERS ——————————————————
THE DAILY BENEFACTOR now provides you with a large selection of NEWS WIDGETS containing RSS feeds from the most comprehensive news sources on the internet, such as THE DRUDGE REPORT, GATEWAY PUNDIT, THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER, WORLDNETDAILY, POLITICO, THE WALL STREET JOURNAL, CNS, MICHELLE MALKIN, BREITBART, and THE JERUSALEM POST. Check them out!
————————————————————————————————————————————————
Pat Austin: It is not just any crap sandwich!
It is a crap sandwich made with real bipartisan crap!
I’ll be perusing the Ever-Loving-Crap-Sandwich-Lobotomy-Inducing-Piece-of-Bovine-Excrement Omnibus bill throughout the day, as many others will be doing, and as I do, I’d like to point out that it’s not just Democrats, of course, who have loaded this piece of junk with earmarks.
Several “Republicans” had added their two cents worth as well, including Mitch McConnell who has included a request for “$650,000 for a genetic technology center at the University of Kentucky.” Sen. Lindsey Graham “has a $379,000 earmark to study port dredging in Charleston.”
Michelle Malkin on Lame Ducks and Lame Politicians!
Michelle is all over these miscreants
Yesterday, Senate Democrats dropped their 1,924-page omnibus spending bomb on Capitol Hill. My column today reports on the other omnibus bomb up their sleeves — a massive omnibus land grab that Dingy Harry Reid vowed yesterday to bring up before the stretched-out lame-duck session ends. It’s green pork galore: “Reid’s staff sees a natural resources omnibus as a rare chance for members to bring something home to their districts and therefore worth the extra time needed to see such a large bill through to completion.”
Many of the items on the enviros’ wish list have been divvied up between the omnibus spending bill and the omnibus lands bill. (I’ve uploaded them both below for easy reference.) A San Francisco Bay restoration grant program pushed by Sen. Boxer (p. 874), Great Lakes watershed program (p. 626), Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta heritage designation (p.880), and Montana forest and watershed plan pushed by Sen. Tester (p. 897) are among the eco-goodies stuffed into the omnibus spending bill. Dozens of other land grabs have been bundled together in the omnibus lands bill, including several projects in Reid’s home state of Nevada, as I note below.
Sen. Tester’s GOP opponent summed up the transparency-evading tactics perfectly:
Republican Rep. Denny Rehberg, who many Republicans hope will run against Tester in 2012, slammed the inclusion of Tester’s bill in the spending package without undergoing a full committee hearings process in both chambers. “This is government at its worst,” Rehberg said. “These are exactly the sort of underhanded tactics the American people rejected in November. Apparently, the message didn’t get through.” He called it “a shameful attempt to force-feed Montanans another dose of big-government.”
Pork addicted bastards!
Your daily moment of Sharia cruelty
We’re a day late to this but it shouldn’t be missed. The scene: A street protest in downtown Khartoum (or is it Tehran, or post-U.S. Kandahar?), organized to fight … violence against women.
The flogging is initially to her back, in keeping with the Sharia code, or Islamic law, governing flogging, but when she turns to ask for mercy, the whipping continues to the front part of her body, including her face, hands and legs…
On late Sunday, Sudan’s Judiciary Authority, which oversees the legal system, announced it had launched an inquiry to see if the punishment had been administered improperly. The authority said nothing about the punishment itself…
Flogging is common in northern Sudan, where Islamic law is often enforced arbitrarily under the Public Order Act. Police and “public order units” have powers to enforce what is inappropriate dress or behavior. Local human rights organizations have long accused police of abusing their authority to mistreat women.
There is, I hope, a special place in Hell for these bastards!
Sure NOW they tell us!
I remember my parents using saccarhin when I was young, until it was deemed dangerous. Well, after further review……………
Saccharin, an artificial sweetener dubbed a potential cancer-causing agent in the 1980s, has now been officially declared safe.Without any fanfare, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency said Tuesday it was dropping the crystalline powder — widely used in diet soft drinks, chewing gum, juice and toothpaste — from its list of hazardous substances.
“Saccharin is no longer considered a potential hazard to human health,” the EPA said in the announcement.
Oh no, Al Gore is freaking out again!
Well, actually, it seems Gore is in perpetual freak out mode so, this is just par for the course!
Al Gore is beside himself at the fact that Fox News executives told their employees not to report global warming rhetoric from the likes of, well, Al Gore, as unquestionable scientific fact without also offering the other side of the story. Scandal!
To me that’s the definition of “fair and balanced,” but to Gore it’s dangerously biased, manipulative reporting.
Listen To The Chimpsy’s Real American Christmas Special Tonight!
Chimpsy’s Real American 87: The CRA Christmas Show – David Cholesterol
When: Wednesday, December 15 From 8:00pm – 9:30pm Est.
Ho Ho Ho! It’s that festive time of year again, as David Cholesterol (DC) hosts his 5th annual Christmas Show!
Get out the eggnog, and get ready for some new parody tunes, as well as the liberal-mocking ditties of CHIMPSmas’ past.
Listen as DC unwraps the messages left for him under the big CRA tree! And be there, as DC tells us of a Soldier’s Christmas!
DC will also be joined by Oleg Atbashian, director of the People’s Cube (www.thepeoplescube.com) and author of Shakedown Socialism. As they discuss the failure of Socialism.
And as a bonus gift, DC will define the liberal term NEOCON, and expose those who use it!
So don’t be a Scrooge, a Grinch, or a liberal… and be there with Jingle Bells on!!!!
Click HERE For More Information
————————————————————————————————————————————————
But what exactly IS Chimpsy’s Real American – you may be asking – and who the heck is David Cholesterol? The Following videos may help to answer those questions… or not.
Gatordoug
darcprynce
Dave C
