I just shared this on my FB, and am about to hit the reblog button. OutSTANDING bit of intel there. I’ve said the same, as logically deduced. What part of “Shall Not Be Infringed” seemed to have been misunderstood? It wasn’t, it was just blatantly violated.
Reblogged this on Cmblake6's Weblog and commented:
“Shall Not Be Infringed” was not misunderstood, it was merely blatantly violated by a government bent on the destruction of The Constitution.
I just shared this on my FB, and am about to hit the reblog button. OutSTANDING bit of intel there. I’ve said the same, as logically deduced. What part of “Shall Not Be Infringed” seemed to have been misunderstood? It wasn’t, it was just blatantly violated.
Reblogged this on Cmblake6's Weblog and commented:
“Shall Not Be Infringed” was not misunderstood, it was merely blatantly violated by a government bent on the destruction of The Constitution.
Reblogged this on That Mr. G Guy's Blog.