*VIDEO* Andrew Klavan: Country Without Borders


.

.

Detroit Resident Melinda Brown Duncan Has A Few Words For The Politicians Who Run Her City (Video)

Detroit Woman’s Rant Was So Powerful People Think She Should Run For Mayor – TellMeNow

.

.
Meet Melinda Brown Duncan, a Detroit resident who’s had it up to her eyeballs with the efforts – or lack thereof – of local politicians to fix up the city. In perhaps one of the most comically honest rants ever given, Ms. Duncan now even has people calling for her to run for mayor.

Duncan starts off by explaining how local politicians are out of touch with reality as they don’t experience the same hardships endured by their constituents. Instead of living it up in their posh environments, all paid for by tax payers, Duncan suggests that maybe they should come and take a peek what it’s like living in the “real” Detroit.

.

.
She then suggests that police officers need to pay more – as they put their lives on the line – as maybe such an adjustment may add to law enforcement efficiency. Saying that she doesn’t know anything about politics, Duncan does say that if no one can run the city properly, she’d be more than willing to handle the task at hand.

Duncan’s rant was so powerful that people have even started calling for her election and have even already began making campaign shirt. Although they’re more than likely sarcastic in nature, some are arguing that Duncan could, in all reality, probably run the city better than those currently in charge.

.
…………

.

.

*VIDEO* Andrew Klavan: Who Still Supports Barack Obama?


.

.

What Would Campaign Ads Look Like If Politicians Were Honest? (Videos)

Hilarious Fake Campaign Videos: What Ads Would Look Like If Politicians Were Being Honest – BizPac Review

.

.
ust in time for the summer campaign season, when TV airwaves are inundated with ads touting one candidate over another, a group has produced several videos that show us what politicians would really say if they were truly being honest.

As might be expected, there are plenty of references to campaign donations.

The ads feature a faux candidate “Honest Gil” Fulbright, a very likable fellow who lays the truth out there, and he does such a good job, viewers may still be encouraged to vote for him.

Fulbright even has his own website, where he tells visitors: “I’m running for U.S. Senate in Kentucky, but I’m not going to talk to you about ‘jobs’ and the ‘middle class.’ People without jobs can’t afford to donate to my campaign. And the middle class, well, they’ll be gone soon anyway.”

The group Represent.us is behind the ads, and according to their website, they “are building a non-partisan movement to end the culture of legalized corruption that has come to define modern politics.”

Here’s “Honest Gil” in the first ad, and he doesn’t mind telling you that he’ll go by just about any name, if it keeps the flow of cash going:

.

.
The next ad, which may be the best of the three, covers the all important topic of healthcare, and as “Honest Gil” demonstrates, he could use an upgrade in his own coverage, if you’d be so kind as to elect him to office:

.

.
The third ad covers “Net Neutrality,” with ol’ Gil sharing his thoughts on those “sweet, sweet campaign donations:

.

.

.

*VIDEO* Andrew Klavan: Which Scandal Is Which?


.

.

You do not have to be Cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs to write for Slate

Slate is the MSNBS of online magazines, and, here is the latest outrageous outrage they have discovered. Beware Infant Gender Assignment!

Obstetricians, doctors, and midwives commit this procedure on infants every single day, in every single country. In reality, this treatment is performed almost universally without even asking for the parents’ consent, making this practice all the more insidious. It’s called infant gender assignment: When the doctor holds your child up to the harsh light of the delivery room, looks between its legs, and declares his opinion: It’s a boy or a girl, based on nothing more than a cursory assessment of your offspring’s genitals.

Declares his opinion? And you say this “opinion” is based on something as flimsy as genitals? SHOCKING! I mean, yes, in fact gender IS defined by genitals, just as writing for Slate is defined on absurdity. I am trying to conger up how the “evil” gender assignment goes. The doctor, holds up a child, peers at the genitals, and calmly calls the nurse over.

“Excuse me nurse, but this baby appears to have a penis, do you concur?”

“Why yes doctor, that looks like a penis to me”

“So, this baby then, must be a boy”

“Why yes doctor, yes”

See, this is OUTRAGEOUS! And thankfully, we have an outraged American to expose this shockingly shocking outrageously outrageous outrage! I know I am outraged! and we all should be. I mean think about where this might lead! The Slate piece continues

We tell our children, “You can be anything you want to be.” We say, “A girl can be a doctor, a boy can be a nurse,” but why in the first place must this person be a boy and that person be a girl? Your infant is an infant. Your baby knows nothing of dresses and ties, of makeup and aftershave, of the contemporary social implications of pink and blue. As a newborn, your child’s potential is limitless. The world is full of possibilities that every person deserves to be able to explore freely, receiving equal respect and human dignity while maximizing happiness through individual expression.

Wait, what? How dare this Slate writer call that infant an infant? Who the Hell are they to place that kind of label on that baby? I mean, yes, the fact IS that it is an infant, but facts do not matter. I mean, if a penis or vagina do not have anything to do with gender, then how does a baby actually being a baby mean anything either? But, this is important stuff, it MUST BE because only really important topics are covered in Slate right? Either that or this writer is as crazy as they come

With infant gender assignment, in a single moment your baby’s life is instantly and brutally reduced from such infinite potentials down to one concrete set of expectations and stereotypes, and any behavioral deviation from that will be severely punished—both intentionally through bigotry, and unintentionally through ignorance. That doctor (and the power structure behind him) plays a pivotal role in imposing those limits on helpless infants, without their consent, and without your informed consent as a parent. This issue deserves serious consideration by every parent, because no matter what gender identity your child ultimately adopts, infant gender assignment has effects that will last through their whole life.

See! Your child’s life will be RUINED, R-U-I-N-E-D RUINED if a doctor is allowed to say it is a boy, or it is a girl! Oh there are several layers of KRAZY here folks I mean this MUST be a hoax right? No one could possibly believe the absurdities uttered here right? I mean even Slate must no allow this level of KRAZY right? Wrong!

Why must we force this on kids at birth? What is achieved, besides reinforcing tradition? What could be the harm in letting a child wait to declare for themself who they are, once they’re old enough (which is generally believed to happen around age 2 or 3)?

What insanity is this? When was the last time you, as a parent, grandparent, or uncle as I a witnessed a 2 or 3-year-old “declare themselves”? I doubt anyone has, but what would it sound like? Let us think here.

Think of a family gathering. As the adults are drinking their coffees, here comes young Patrick, age 3. “Excuse me everyone” Patrick says, clinking a fork on a water glass. “I am glad I have you all hear, I have something I need to say. I am, in fact, a girl, or rather a woman, trapped in a little boy’s body. Yes, yes, I do have a penis, but do not label me because of that you genderist bastards! I am woman, hear me roar! So, I have a list of demands here, call them my Gender Justice List if you will.” I have more here, but you will have to wait for the book to be published. it is called “My fight for Gender Justice: How My Inner Vagina and I beat Genderism!”

Of course, that is a bit of absurdity to illustrate how wrong, foolish, inane, insane, BATSHIT CRAZY this writer really is. Yes, Cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs!

 

*VIDEO* Who Knew Trey Gowdy Was Funny?


.
————————————————————————————————————————–
.

Full Speech:

.

.

*VIDEO* Jimmy Kimmel: Putincize


.

*AUDIO* Walton & Johnson Interview Dr. Ben Carson


.

*VIDEO* Andrew Klavan: Fake Climate Change


.

*AUDIO* Mark Steyn: Turning Cow Manure Into Drinking Water


.

*VIDEO* Jihadi Work Accident: Explosive Belt Detonates During Syrian Terrorism Party


.
I have to admit, this video made me giggle.

But then I’m an Islamophobe, a xenophoba, and probably a racist too, so…

.

*VIDEO* Andrew Klavan: Why Democrats Call You Racist


.

*VIDEOS* Your Daley Gator, Happy-Go-Lucky, Andrew Klavan-A-Thon That’ll Take WAY Too Long To Load… Enjoy


ARE YOU A RACIST? A FRANK CONVERSATION

.
THE BIN LADEN EFFECT: HOW NANCY PELOSI AND STEPHEN COLBERT LEARNED TO LOVE SEAL TEAM SIX

.
ELECTILE DYSFUNCTION

.
OBAMACARE: LIES OR CRAP?

.
MULTICULTURALISM EXPLAINED

.
IMAGINE THERE’S NO BORDER

.
TALKING CRAP II: THIS TIME IT’S CRAP

.
BUMPER STICKER POLICE

.
YOU TOO CAN BE A MAINSTREAM MEDIA REPORTER

.
THE EXTREMISTS ARE COMING!

.
INTERNATIONAL MEN’S DAY

.
STOP THE HATE!

.
LIBERALISM EXPOSED: BEYOND THE ELITIST, PREENING, AMERICA-HATING STEREOTYPES

.
THE HILARIOUS WORLD OF ABORTION

.
WHAT’S THE MATTER WITH AMERICA?

.

*VIDEO* Andrew Klavan: International Men’s Day


.

Your Daley Gator Anti-Obama Picture O’ The Day


…..

.

@ Conservatives: How To Be Effective Culture Warriors Without Being Pro Filmmakers, Writers, Musicians, Etc.


Here’s my advice to you people, and I’ll keep this short and sweet: produce the types of YouTube videos you see below – even if they suck. After all, most Hollywood movies suck. Most books suck. Most paintings suck. Most songs suck. Most artistic endeavors suck!

The thing about leftists is that they don’t care if they suck, so they flood the world with their “art”, and even though most of it sucks, a lot of it sticks.

The problem with conservatives is that we worry so much about other people thinking we suck that we refuse to take a chance on openly sucking.

I say, why worry about that? IF WE SUCK, LET’S SUCK OUT LOUD! At least we’ll be in the game.

And so, I now share with you all the essentials of right-wing cyber-militancy.

(Or, how I stopped worrying about sucking and learned to embrace creativity.)

Take notice of the following CATEGORIES of videos. They are the keys to your effectiveness as culture warriors. Imprint them on your minds.

Or don’t. I mean, what do I know? It’s not like millions of people have viewed my YouTube channel or anything. *sarcasm off*

.

MASHUP & OVERDUB

.
.

.

.

.

.

JUSTAPOSITION & POINT-COUNTERPOINT

.
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

PARODY & SATIRE

.
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

TRIBUTE & MEMORIAL

.
.

.

.

.