This is what the Left calls “progress”

Totally erasing any distinction between the genders is one of the goals of the Left Follow along here with me. A woman, who wants to be a man, has a baby, but refuses to be called the “mother” because in his her its mind she is a he, so he is a father. WTF!

The father had insisted on a home birth to avoid being listed as the mother on hospital documents – a Germanlegal requirement.

Although the father has been taking hormone replacement therapies for years he elected to retain the reproductive organs of a woman.

Because he physically gave birth to the child the unidentified man is seen as the mother, however by law he is recognised as a man.

In 2001 German law dropped the previous requirement for gender reassignment surgery in order to be lawfully recognised in a person’s perceived gender.

Perceived gender? Again I ask WTF??

It was only in August of this year that Germany decided to include a ‘third gender’ option on birth certificates, where children born of indeterminate gender no longer have to be listed as either ‘male’ or ‘female’. Germany has been the first country in Europe to adopt this change.

The man’s request to appear as the father on the birth certificate has been granted, but his demand that the child’s gender not be released has been denied, according to the Daily Mail.

Good Freaking Grief! Excedrin needs a new formula called Moonbat Relief!

funny-headache-puppy-dog-dude-enough-paws-ears-cute-pics

 

 

So, let me understand this, we are supposed to see Oprah as a victim?

I will confess the first time I heard Oprah’s self-pitying, I thought it sounded contrived. Maybe I tend to be a bit skeptical when a Liberal screams RAAAAACISM because the Left sees racism everywhere. Now, the clerk is saying that Oprah is a big fat liar

Winfrey says the clerk refused to show her an expensive item because she assumed a woman of color wouldn’t have the means to afford it.

That’s a lie, the anonymous sales clerk says according to the UK Daily Mail, adding she’s felt “powerless” as a result of the media  barrage following the incident.

I explained to her the bags came in different sizes and materials, like I always do.

‘She looked at a frame behind me. Far above there was the 35,000 Swiss franc crocodile leather bag.

‘I simply told her that it was like the one I held in my hand, only much more expensive, and that I could show her similar bags.

‘It is absolutely not true that I declined to show her the bag on racist grounds. I even asked her if she wanted to look at the bag.

First off IF Oprah’s version is true, and she is not just playing the victim to gain some publicity, which i think she is, are we really supposed to feel badly for Oprah? Tell you what Oprah I will GLADLY be a “victim” if I can have your money, OK? Hell I have been followed in a store, stopped at a mall by security once, and was even told at a bookstore I could not thumb through a magazine, it happens. should it happen? In a perfect world no, but happen it does, to people of ALL races, so Oprah, please take your “Victim of Racism Card” and stick it! I bet you might even be able to use a few hundred-dollar bills to dry your tears. I wonder if Oprah ever wonders how a poor victimized Black woman EVER got to be a multi-BILLIONAIRE in RAAAAACIST America?

BTW, heard on CNN today at work that Oprah is now saying the incident was overblown. In other words Oprah lied!

 

Why the UK will lose to radical Islam

Playing the appeasement game with terrorists and mad men never works, and the Left never learns that lesson

So yesterday I talked about the suppression of speech in Britain and it turns out that the story has expanded and some details have been added.  Let me quote from the Daily Mail,  with analysis interspersed.  It’s not quite a “fisking,” because I always understood that term as being hostile to the author of the piece, but it is almost a point-by-point commentary similar to one:

The murder of soldier Lee Rigby has provoked a backlash of anger across the UK, including the attacking of mosques, racial abuse and comments made on social media.
 
Well, of course actual physical attacks on mosques are not protected speech by any reasonable understanding of it—I mean besides Mona Eltahawy’s idiot theories—but I didn’t feel confident that we are talking about physical attacks.  There is a disturbing tendency among some on the left these days to pretend that criticism is an “attack” thus blurring the line between action and mere words.  So I was curious to check it out.
 
Eleven people have been arrested around Britain for making ‘racist or anti-religious’ comments on Twitter following the brutal killing in Woolwich on Wednesday.
 
The incident has also prompted a huge increase in anti-Muslim incidents, according to the organisation Faith Matters, which works to reduce extremism.
 
Besides the revelation that now eleven have been arrested (and remember, in my last post, some were being warned without arrest), I checked out the Faith Matterswebsite.  They provide a map of Mosque attacks, and a quick sampling of a few makes it clear that this is essentially vandalism.  Although really, is it even worth fretting that someone left bacon at one?  Next we will get reports of someone TP-ing their trees.  I’m not even sure leaving bacon counts as trespass or littering.  (For instance, church property is generally open to the public.  And often littering laws include exceptions for biodegradable items, such as food.)  But presuming the veracity of these accounts at least they involve conduct and not merely speech.
Much more at Allergic To Bull. 

 

More loving medical care under universal health care

Via Gateway Pundit

A leading medical journal in Great Britain revealed the gruesome practice of starving and withdrawing fluid from sickly babies as well as terminally-ill adults.

The Daily Mail reported:

Sick children are being discharged from NHS hospitals to die at home or in hospices on controversial ‘death pathways’.

Until now, end of life regime the Liverpool Care Pathway was thought to have involved only elderly and terminally-ill adults.

But the Mail can reveal the practice of withdrawing food and fluid by tube is being used on young patients as well as severely disabled newborn babies.

One doctor has admitted starving and dehydrating ten babies to death in the neonatal unit of one hospital alone.

Writing in a leading medical journal, the physician revealed the process can take an average of ten days during which a baby becomes ‘smaller and shrunken’.

The LCP – on which 130,000 elderly and terminally-ill adult patients die each year – is now the subject of an independent inquiry ordered by ministers.

The use of end of life care methods on disabled newborn babies was revealed in the doctors’ bible, the British Medical Journal.

Earlier this month, an un-named doctor wrote of the agony of watching the protracted deaths of babies. The doctor described one case of a baby born with ‘a lengthy list of unexpected congenital anomalies’, whose parents agreed to put it on the pathway.

The doctor wrote: ‘They wish for their child to die quickly once the feeding and fluids are stopped. They wish for pneumonia. They wish for no suffering. They wish for no visible changes to their precious baby.

‘Their wishes, however, are not consistent with my experience. Survival is often much longer than most physicians think; reflecting on my previous patients, the median time from withdrawal of hydration to death was ten days.

‘Parents and care teams are unprepared for the sometimes severe changes that they will witness in the child’s physical appearance as severe dehydration ensues.

This is the ultimate price for rejecting Individualism and embracing Collectivism

Katie Holmes does a sexy photo shoot, short washed up over actor hardest hit

American Power has the link and story

 

The piece suggests you wouldn’t know that Katie Holmes was under any marital stress. And frankly, given the speed at which they settled, I think she came out looking like a pro — a strong, capable woman, the kind that feminists are supposed to be raving about.

In any case, lovely pictures, at London’s Daily Mail, “The reinvention of Katie: Miss Holmes gets a sultry fashion makeover in photoshoot taken just days before dumping Tom Cruise.

Sultry huh? Let us see YEP!

 

What if the Left called for a Day of Rage, but no one was really outraged?

Donald Douglas reports on the tragic shortage of outrage on Wall Street

According to one source, only about 300 people showed up.

But see MyFoxNY, “Day Of Rage’ Protest On Wall Street.”

And there’s a big write-up at New York Times, Wall Street Protest Begins, With Demonstrators Blocked,” and Daily Mail, ‘We won’t put up with their greed any more': Demonstrators try to take over Wall Street in protest against corruption and budget cuts.”

I love it when the Left is exposed for what they are, a very small minority!

Would I be wrong to ask just one question concerning the UK riots?

The question is this. Why in the Hell doesn’t the British government order the police to shoot these miscreant bastards? Would I be insensitive if I asked that? And by the way, I am in FULL agreement with Donald Douglas on what to do if this type of madness starts here

I’ll tell you this: If it’s coming to America, I will never be forced to strip down to my underwear upon threats from possessed underclass ruffians. I will fight these people to the death. When society has lost its collective mind, and when authorities are helpless to do the thing that they are established to do — keep order and decency — then you have to protect yourself and your family. I will not have my wife and children stripped and humiliated and robbed of their clothing on the freakin’ streets. And I would help anyone facing such raw brutality if I see it happening to them in person. It can happen here. See London’s Daily Mail, “Forced to strip naked in the street: Shocking scenes as rioters steal clothes and rifle through bags as people make their way home.” I’ll have more on this. The British government clearly isn’t up to the task of defending against lawlessness

One of the commentors at American Power makes a great point, that I also thought of

The only reason these things happen in the UK is because of a disarmed populace. Here in Texas this would last about one hour.

The UK has disarmed its people, and now, these thugs recognize that they can have easy pickings

So, breasts are now offensive to Muslims?

Breastfeeding an infant
Image via Wikipedia

Or is it breast feeding, either way, apparently it tis better to starve the child than to offend you know who

Oh no, we mustn’t offend Muslims. They’re still emotionally immature even after 1,500 years.

Daily Mail

A mother was ordered not to breastfeed her baby in public because she was in a ‘multicultural building’.

Emma Mitchell, 32, was about to feed 19-week-old son Aaron when a receptionist at a town hall warned her to stop.

So, titties offend Muslims?

Your dose of Sharia evil

A 19-year-old girl, stoned to death for entering a beauty contest. Via Gateway Pundit

A Muslim girl was stoned to death in Ukraine for entering a beauty contest.
The Daily Mail reported:

A teenage Muslim girl was stoned to death under ‘Sharia law’ after taking part in a beauty contest in Ukraine.

Katya Koren, 19, was found dead in a village in the Crimea region near her home.

Friends said she liked wearing fashionable clothes and had come seventh in a beauty contest. Her battered body was buried in a forest and was found a week after she disappeared.

Police have opened a murder probe and are investigating claims that three Muslim youths killed her claiming her death was justified under Islam.

One of the three – named as 16-year-old Bihal Gaziev – is under arrest and told police she had ‘violated the laws of Sharia’.

Evil, simply evil

Noted blogger interviews Christina Hendricks breasts

So, there I was, sitting at my computer, drinking an ice-cold brew, a Tap Room No. 21 Amber Ale, and I started to ponder what in the world Bob Belvedere has been up to. Turns out that Bob snagged an interview with some famous breasts The burning question, apparently was the realness of her, you know…………..

No man who believes in God could think otherwise, my dear.

The lovely lady talked with Linda Das of The London Daily Mail.  A highlight:

It was reported this year that there had been a sharp rise in breast augmentation in the UK because British women were longing to look more like Christina, though she says: ‘I hope I’m not encouraging that. If there’s anything to be learned from me it’s that I’m learning to celebrate what I was born with, even though it’s sometimes been inconvenient. Having larger breasts has made it harder for me to shop throughout the years, but I’ve learnt to love it. It’s so bizarre that people are constantly asking if my breasts are real or fake,’ she adds. ‘They’re so obviously real that anyone who’s ever seen or touched a breast would know.’

Bob also critiqued the First Lady’s Hair which, may or may not be real, but it is not as spectacular as Hendricks breasts

Now THIS is a conspiracy theory!

Don Surber has fun with the latest conspiracy theory

From the London Daily Mail:

In pictures, Obama appears to have a long scar which goes up the side of his head and over his crown.

Some conspiracy theorists claim they are scars that you would see on someone who has had brain surgery.

Now this is all nonsense.

This cannot be.

There are no brain surgeons in Kenya.

Frankly, this is a plot to separate Donald Trump from more of his money as he sends private detectives to chase down another rumor.