I think Matthews and his cohorts here, Joan Walsh, and David Corn really should head up Hillary 2016. Let these Left Wing fruitcakes be the “brains” and faces of her campaign
Matthews replied, “If you’re watching, Madam Secretary, all three of us have brilliant ideas. All of us have great ideas. And I especially put myself in that group with Joan and David. We know how to do this, we’ll get you in there.”
Although there may have been a little tongue in Matthews’ cheek, everyone watching knew full well that he meant it, and that his mission in the next 44 months – as well as that of likely every MSNBC contributor and guest – is to get Clinton in the White House.
Joan Walsh, David Corn, and Crazy legs Matthews have “brilliant ideas”? More like delusions of competence. These three could not think their way out of a wet paper bag.
GOOD FREAKING GRIEF! Is there any doubt who our Marxist Moron of the Day is?
Joan Walsh on Sunday said former USDA official Shirley Sherrod is allowed to say anything she wants about racism — including calling Fox News and Andrew Breitbart racist — because her father was killed by a white man.
Discussing last week’s controversy on CNN’s “Reliable Sources,” Salon’s Editor-in-Chief actually claimed, “The woman’s father was murdered by a white farmer, and there were witnesses, and the white justice system never found the murderer guilty.”
“She’s entitled to talk about race any way she wants to.”
Joan you ignorant…….
By Gator Doug
Joan Walsh of Salon should know better than to write things that are easily refuted. Smitty blasts her softball pitch out of the park
Joan Walsh has posted the most risible dismissal of Andrew Breitbart imaginable. Emphasis mine:
Andrew Breitbart isn’t fit to spit-shine the shoes of civil rights hero and Congressman John Lewis. It’s ludicrous to think that the right-wing bully believed he had the moral or political standing to call Lewis a liar, after Lewis and two other black congressmen reported they were called “nigger” by tea partiers during the healthcare reform vote March 20. Lewis’s word on the confrontation is good enough for me.
What about personality-free facts? Videos shot on the spot? What about the fact that Breitbart backs up his claims with money? What about the fact that Breitbart, while arguably abrasive, as truth can be at times, has a sterling reputation?
Now comes news that Breitbart is the liar – or at least the misleader. Video he’s been peddling to “prove” the congressmen were not called the N-word was actually after the slurs occurred. As a friend notes, “It’s like running video of the Twin Towers on 9/10 to prove 9/11 didn’t happen.” Of course the videos Breitbart peddled to claim ACORN helped a supposed pimp and prostitute set up a child-prostitution ring have also been found misleading, at best. The California Attorney General’s review said they were “severely edited” and in fact “showed no violation of the law.” New York authorities concluded the same thing.
Was the video from after the alleged incident? You must have a hard timestamp for the purported event yourself to back up this claim of time shenanigans, Walsh. Why not trot out some facts to back up your claim? Could there be a total lack of facts on your side of the argument?
Go read it all, and enjoy the smackdown.
And, Smitty, for his efforts, earns our Blogger of the Day Award! Smitty is one of the bloggers that has been very gracious in his linkage to this blog, and Ed and I appreciate his generosity, and taste in blogs!