Boy, Stacy McCain really wants to be called a Homophobe

Stacy, who will be IMPOSSIBLE to live with if Alabama whips Notre Dame next month, links a story about a Lesbian, who was married to a man that might be the next mayor of New Yawk, and risks the dreaded Homophobe label!

Hunter Walker of the New York Observer highlights the lesbian past of Chirlane McCray who, for the past 20 years, has been the wife of Bill de Blasio, a likely candidate for mayor of New York City. Such stories are a lot less rare than the “gay gene” theorists would have you believe, but because the born-that-way mantra is essential to the argument that homosexuals should be treated as a special category for civil-rights purposes, these stories don’t usually get much attention.

Accusations of “homophobia” in 3, 2, 1 . . .

Me? I really could not care much less if they are born, or choose to play for the other team, that is not of concern to me, but it does remind me of a joke that might get me labelled a Homophobe.

Why don’t Lesbians wear makeup when they diet? Because you cannot eat Jenny Craig with Mary Kay on your face. Which reminds me that I should post about why service industry people HATE the women of Mary Kay. But, I will save that story for another time. Right now, I am waiting to see if I am called a Homophobe first, or accused of telling bad jokes. And, as an exit question, if people are born Homophobic, do they deserve civil rights protection? HMMMM

If you were wondering when gendered pronouns would be deemed offensive…………..

Wonder no more! Over at Hot Air Jazz Shaw has the latest on an outbreak of Offendeditis at Harvard

If you’re like me, (and aren’t you all?) I know you’ve been waiting impatiently with one question on your minds. When, oh when, will Harvard appoint a new permanent director of BGLTQ student life? (We’re going to circle back to that acronym which caught me by surprise in a few moments.) Fear not, readers, for your long wait is over. And the winner is…

Vanidy M. Bailey will serve as director of Bisexual, Gay, Lesbian, Transgender, and Queer (BGLTQ) student life beginning July 16, dean of Harvard College Evelynn M. Hammonds announced this week. Bailey, who will report to the assistant dean of student life, will oversee all initiatives that support BGLTQ undergraduates.

So… we’ve got that little chore out of the way. But wait! Steyn discoversthat yet another grievous social injustice has taken place even in the midst of this happy occasion.

Alas, this long overdue shattering of the BGLTQ ceiling was marred by the Harvard Crimson’s grossly insensitive coverage:

An earlier version of this article used the pronoun “she” to refer to Vanidy “Van” Bailey, the newly appointed director of bisexual, gay, lesbian, transgender, and queer student life. In fact, Bailey prefers not to be referred to by any gendered pronoun.

What does Vanidy prefer? It? That thing? Seriously, Vanidy IS a man or she, he, it is a woman right? Whatever Vanidy is, we know one thing for certain. Vanidy suffers from  a grossly over-inflated ego, if she expects us to change the English language to soothe her sensitivities. Maybe Vanidy has never been told that her feelings are not THAT important in the grand scheme of things? Maybe someone should pull her aside and say, Vanidy, get the Hell over yourself.

One more question, this term Bisexual, Gay, Lesbian, Transgender, and Queer bugs me. I thought Queer was a forbidden term. I also kind of thought it meant the same as Gay, so it is redundant isn’t it?

Because they are OBSESSED with LESBIANISM, that is why!

An odd title for a blog post perhaps, but Stacy asked a question, and I answered it

Melissa Etheridge’s Hideous Breakup

What? I’d missed this news: Evidently, the rock guitarist’s lesbian divorce turned nasty and Daily Beast columnist Tricia Romano decided to write about it in the context of “what does it mean for the gay rights movement?”

This is retarded: When Charlie Sheen got divorced, did anyone write about that in the context of “what does this mean for the cocaine-and-hookers lifestyle movement”? I think not. For some reason, when two lesbians break up, that’s about political rights, whereas when Charlie Sheen breaks up with somebody . . . . Well, if he accuses the hooker of stealing his watch, nobody really views Charlie as a victim of discrimination or anything, you see.

As I see it, the Left is obsessed with placing labels on everyone. They take people, and make them think that EVERYTHING that happens to them is a direct result of their skin color/religion/gender/sexual preference. The Left has played this identity politics game for decades now. Generally, the Left has been all too effective in embittering Blacks, Hispanics, women, Gays, Lesbians, and any other demographic they can come up with. This is all about keeping these groups voting Democrat.

 

I have worked with a few people who have fallen into this trap. EVERYTHING bad that happens to them is because they are a Lesbian, or Black, or a woman, or an atheist, blah, blah, blah.

So, of course, the Etheridge divorce MUST be about Lesbianism. At least in the minds of the Left.

The Science of Hot Lesbians

Stacy McCain, who is neither a scientist, nor a Lesbian posts about some science that has piqued his interest.

Denial can be a powerful defense mechanism. Apparently, homophobia is too — at least according to a new study from researchers from the University of Rochester, the University of Essex, England, and the University of California in Santa Barbara.

Their research concluded that the intense fear and repulsion college-age homophobes feel toward gays and lesbians is likely due to the fact that they see similarities in themselves.

“Individuals who identify as straight but in psychological tests show a strong attraction to the same sex may be threatened by gays and lesbians because homosexuals remind them of similar tendencies within themselves,” said lead author Netta Weinstein of the University of Essex, according to Science Daily.

Interesting, of course it is true that some people do over compensate.Your anti-porn zealot who secretly plays choke the chicken in front of their PC every night. Or the prohibitionist who battles against alcoholism. Of course,this study might be outcome based , so who knows how accurate it is. But, I am very interested to find that Stacy McCain is interested in a scientific study that has lots of merit.

For many years, I’ve been working on a scientific study to confirm my hypothesis that some lesbians — the really hot ones — are in fact secretly bisexual and eager to have me join them for a threesome.

Now THAT is science I would love to delve into! Strictly for the science of course. Because science is important!

Well, now Donald Douglas has gone and done it!

In one very short blog post title, Douglas might have offended most of the people on earth! And I am darned proud of him. Here, is that title, and be warned you too might be offended by it!

African Indigents with Massive Erect Cocks?

Click the link to see what Douglas is talking about, and trust me, it is an excellent post exposing the inanity of the race-obsessed Left. But, let us consider the incredible outbreak of Offendeditis this will surely cause

It will offend, of course the race pimps, and all those who suffer from Racial Obsession Syndrome

It will outrage Feminuts, because, well men with erections deeply offend Feminuts for two reasons. A man with an erection is likely thinking about a Hooters waitress, a cheerleader, or maybe a woman in a bikini, and a man finding women attractive or sexy is “degrading” to women according to Feminist theology. The other reason that Feminuts will be offended is that most Feminuts are either too ugly, or to damned mean or in most cases both, to give a man an erection.

It will offend Leftists who always defend thugs and rioters as “victims of Capitalism and Western society”

It will offend those who freak out every time they see a naughty word, and that is good because those types only seem happy when they are offended by something they saw on TV, or read in a magazine, or at a blog. It will offend them so much that they might actually stop begging the FCC to police what their neighbors are watching, which would be a good thing.

It will offend Lesbians, and I doubt I really need to explain why

It will offend every host at MSNBS, who will somehow blame the Tea Party, and Secessionists, because hosts at MSNBS get paid way too much to be offended.

Lastly, Douglas’ post will offend Andrew Sullivan when he finds out there are actually no “massive erections” in the post itself

Of course, I am sure I have offended many people in this post, and I truly hope I did, because, as I have stated before, it seems that these types are only happy when they are offended.