Selective Outrage Syndrome anyone?

Oh that Prince Charles, and his ears just beg to be mocked. Recently the Prince developed outrage over what he calls “anti-immigrant” sentiments

LONDON — The heir to Britain’s throne spoke out Thursday, saying the wave of anti-immigrant populism sweeping the world has “deeply disturbing echoes” of the Nazis’ persecution of Jews in the 1930s.

Prince Charles, the queen’s eldest son, said his parents’ generation “fought and died in a battle against intolerance, monstrous extremism and an inhuman attempt to exterminate the Jewish population of Europe.

“That nearly 70 years later we should still be seeing such evil persecution is to me beyond all belief,” he added. “We owe it to those who suffered and died so horribly not to repeat the horrors of the past.”

Wait, what? Did he actually say we are seeing the same type of evil persecutions the Nazis committed? So, there are concentration camps in Europe? People are being gassed? Of course not, but Chuckles is a Leftist, and he must therefore go way overboard with the emotionalistic rhetoric because #Caring

Surely raw, unworthy hatred for immigrants is a terrible thing. But much of what is going on across the Atlantic, and here, is that people are increasingly tired of immigration laws being rendered meaningless.They are also tired of any hint of national pride being demonized as extreme, or Nazi-like. The fact is much of the issue is with immigration without assimilation. Immigrants who do not care to even try becoming an American, German, Italian etc. is unhealthy for the nation they move to. Immigration without assimilation is a death sentence for the nation accepting such immigrants. Yet, prince Charles fails to see this basic truth. He shows no outrage for immigrants who refuse to integrate themselves into their new home.

He also shows no outrage at the many acts of terror, rapes, sexual assaults, and intimidation many Muslim “refugees” are committing against the Swedes, Germans, French, etc. Where is his outrage at the way far too many European women are being treated by these Muslim refugees? Where is his outrage at what Muslim refugees think about Islamizing Germany?

A translator at refugee camps in Germany has claimed Muslim migrants hate Christians and want to Islamize the country.

The woman, 39, from Eritrea, came to Germany as a refugee herself in 1991, before volunteering at asylum centers to “give something back.”

But the Arabic speaker said what she discovered when working with migrants over the last five years shocked her.

During her time at a number of centers across the country, she said she discovered Muslim refugees preaching “pure hatred” of Christians.

Muslim children were told by their parents not to play with Christian kids.

And she herself was told it was a sin for her to help feed and defend Christians.

She told German Catholic website Kath.net: “They want Germany to be Islamized. They despise our country and our values.”

I suppose this is not worthy of the selective outrage of Prince Charles. He is willingly blind to behavior that is far worse than being “anti-immigrant”

The Toronto Star titled their account of the story:  “Ontario facing ‘epidemic of Islamophobia’ survey finds”. The article did not discuss possible reasons for the attitude of Ontarians, which just may be based on real occurrences with real victims. Some examples: i) Sweden has now become the rape capital of the world; ii) a thousand women were sexually assaulted in Germany as the migrant rape crisis worsens; iii) the 70,000 crimes committed or attempted by migrants in Germany, iv) the declaration by the Islamic State that they have infiltrated the refugees and will continue to do so.

There were also the stories the media covered up, about Muslim “refugees” threatening a Minnesota community with rape, and the incident involving the sexual harassment of teen girls by refugee men at a high school in New Brunswick.

Not all Muslim migrants are criminals. Among them are decent human beings who have gone through hellish experiences, and they need help. But Western media and authorities are also providing cover for jihadists and Muslim migrant criminals, at the expense of innocents who elected them in trust.

It is reprehensible that the entirely warranted caution and fears about Muslim migrant violence that are expressed by hardworking, taxpaying citizens of Canada (and in other Western nations) are brushed aside and deemed “islamophobic”. Authorities are failing their citizenry.

Indeed the hearts of decent people break for most of the refugees. But allowing massive numbers of unvetted people into your nation is no solution. And when a significant number of those people do not share your national culture and values, it is a very destructive thing. It is a vital role of governments to decide who enters their nation, and who can stay and become a citizen. Indeed one of America’s great blessings has been immigrants. But those immigrants must WANT to come here to learn our language, laws, and embrace our culture. E Pluribus Unum means out of many, one. Many different ethnicities, races, religions, etc have come here and have assimilated. That is healthy and wonderful. But, there is danger in simply saying OK, everyone come in

President-Elect Donald Trump is right: Abdul Razak Ali Artan, the Somali refugee who went on a Palestinian-inspired jihad-rampage with a car and a knife, wounding 11 people at Ohio State University last Monday, “should not have been in our country.”

Artan is but one of an unknown number of Muslim refugees who have been allowed into the country through a deliberately flawed screening system that was established by the Obama administration.

Earlier this year, Amman’s refugee resettlement center coordinator at the American Embassy in Jordan, Gina Kassem, admitted that at least 600 refugees had been interviewed each day, hastily, since the center opened in 2015.  Moreover, to achieve the goal set by Obama to increase the flow of refugees to the U.S., the center has not been excluding anyone or “look[ing] for families with certain education background, language skills or other socio-economic factors [or] cut family sizes.”  It is safe to assume that similar actions have been taken by U.S. refugee resettlement coordinators elsewhere.

Where is your outrage Prince Charles? Or are Western lives expendable in your quest for “equality”?

Even if the interviews took longer, how could any U.S. agency involved with the screening of refugees requesting to resettle here check the background of Artan and his family, who reportedly claimed to be a Somalis, who had spent seven years in Pakistan?  Why were the teenage Artan, his mother, and his siblings allowed into the U.S.?  Islamic terrorist activities make both Somalia and Pakistan high-risk countries, and all applicants for immigration to the U.S. should have gone through most rigorous screening.

While White House press secretary Josh Earnest kept reassuring reporters: “This vetting of refugee applicants involves collecting biometric info, doing in-person interviews, doing background checks, running their info through a variety of national security and international databases,” it became clear that it is enough to be “a Muslim refugee” to fit into Obama’s plan to resettle the U.S. with Muslims.

And, truth be told, it seems that Christian refugees are not as likely to be admitted, why?

But the numbers tell a different story: The United States has accepted 10,801 Syrian refugees, of whom 56 are Christian. Not 56 percent; 56 total, out of 10,801. That is to say, one-half of 1 percent.

Somewhere between a half million and a million Syrian Christians have fled Syria, and the United States has accepted 56. Why?

“This is de facto discrimination and a gross injustice,” Nina Shea, director of the Hudson Institute’s Center for Religious Freedom, told Fox News. Fox notes another theory: The United States takes refugee referrals from the U.N. refugee camps in Jordan, and there are no Christians there.

Again, one of the most essential duties of government IS to protect its citizens, and to control immigration. It is not an easy job, especially when so many in governments across the West seem incapable of common sense. Again, Prince Charles, where is your outrage for Maria Ladenburger?

The brutal rape and murder of a 19-year-old German woman, Maria Ladenburger, apparently by Afghan migrant who claims to be 17 years old, seems to have been the last nail in the coffin of Merkel’s open-door migrant policy, which she had promised to not to let go even after extreme opposition from within her own party’s leadership.

Ladenburger had been a medical student volunteering at a migrant housing facility. Her murderer had reportedly seen her in the shelter. The incident set off shockwaves not only in the Germany but also across Europe, especially after promises by Germany’s interior ministry to deport as many Afghan citizens as possible after failing to confirm any credible claims for asylum.

In the meanwhile, authorities in Berlin last weekend announced the arrest of an Afghan citizen who was actively involved in terrorist attacks in Afghanistan, while living part-time in Germany.

German police a few weeks back also launched an operation against a Salafist group in the country, whose members were brainwashing Muslim youths, mostly in Germany, to get jihadist training and join the Islamic State’s battle against the world in Syria and Iraq.

The Salafist organization had registered itself as a social work entity under the cover of distributing the Quran in markets and public places, and claiming to be bridging the gap between the West and Islam.

One suspect was arrested in Aschaffenburg and another was detained in Mannheim, on the allegation of plotting an Islamically motivated attack on a public place.

This recent shift in strategy is also a lesson that the West has learnt a bit too late, despite having experienced similar assaults not that long ago by the Nazis, Mussolini, Lenin, Stalin as well as terror organizations such as Baader Meinhof, al-Shebaab, ETA, the Red Brigades, Hamas, Al Qaeda, Palestinian Islamic Jihad and Hezbollah, to name just a few.

Since the unprecedented terror attacks in France, Belgium and Germany, citizens across the Europe have been living in constant fear. They seem to be sick and tired of the Muslim extremists; children might be in danger on their way to school, and shopping takes place under the protection of soldiers.

Outrage you say Prince Charles? Or is it Selective Outrage?

One thought on “Selective Outrage Syndrome anyone?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s