What is worse than college snowflakes perpetual tantrums?

The colleges which continue to coddle them, excuse their petulant attitudes, and placate them

The University of Nevada, Reno recently sent out a campus-wide message to apologize for an off-duty campus police officer who dressed up as Colin Kaepernick for Halloween.

The school’s Assistant Vice President and Director of University Police Services Adam Garcia penned the missive, saying his officer was “mocking another who has taken advantage of his constitutional right to protest,” according to a copy of the email obtained by Campus Reform.

“Police officers are held to a higher standard and denigrating another—on or off duty—is insensitive for its lack of respect and understanding on how others may negatively view their actions and may be impacted,” Garcia wrote.

Or maybe he just thought it would make a good costume? Or, maybe, maybe he actually was exercising his right to peacefully protest? Either way, the officer was OFF DUTY when this happened, so what Assistant Vice President and Director of University Police Services Adam Garcia is  doing is protest shaming isn’t it? Oh, wait, I forgot, that is a one way street these days

He then went on to note that students have been concerned about their safety in the “current social and political climate,” and that “behavior such as this magnifies unsafe feelings and lack of trust in police, especially when the individual is responsible for the safety of all members of the university, regardless or [sic] color, ethnicity, sexual orientation, or religion.”

If Garcia is arguing that college students are in fear of a costume then he ought to be suggesting they get some counseling, or meds, or maybe they should simply grow up? Oh of course not, Garcia is in deep apology mode here. Get a load of this. you might want to grab a vomit bag first

“At a time when officers should be heightened in their attentiveness to perception by our community, this act seems extremely out of touch with those sentiments and not is not within the spirit of the department’s community oriented policing philosophy,” he added.

Of Adam Garcia, you cowardly fool. Do you actually expect to win something by placating these bullies? And yes, the Snowflakes, cowering in their safe spaces are nothing if not bullies.Everything these miscreants do is designed to intimidate, shame, and coerce everyone to behave as the Snowflakes demand

And anyone with a shred of common sense realizes that all you are doing is encouraging more bullying.

And then the race baiters went after the little children

Never too young to be indoctrinated and embittered!

To get people to hate the greatest country in history, and to embrace sociopathic Black Lives Matter ideology, it helps to start young. From Belleville, Illinois:

Every player on the Cahokia Quarterback Club football team (8 and under) took a knee during the national anthem ahead of Sunday’s game at Little Devil’s Field in Belleville.

Coach Orlando Gooden has been instructing the tots on Colin Kaepernick’s antics, and on the Jason Stockley decision, whereby after many years a white police officer was absolved of murder charges after shooting a drug dealer of politically preferred pigmentation, providing a pretext for days on end of riots

Kids that age are too young to be taught that they are “victims” and that police are hunting them down and that America is a racist hell hole where they have no hope. And yes, that IS the message of BLM, and Colin Kaepernick. The issue here is two fold. First the kids are too young to be targets of any political agitators, especially ones that seek to lie to the kids in order to further their own agenda.

These kids are not getting age relevant information, they are being fed a narrative, a false one.

“One of the kids asked me if I saw (people) protesting and rioting in St. Louis. I said yes; I said, ‘Do you know why they are doing it?’” said Coach Orlando Gooden.

Coach Gooden said his player responded, “Because black people are getting killed and nobody’s going to jail.”

Gooden, who played football at Mizzou, said the kids knew about the Jason Stockley decision.

“I felt like it was a good teaching moment for me to circle the team and have a meeting,” he said.

The coach said he spoke to them about that and other situations that have happened in our country. He then explained why former NFL quarterback Colin Kaepernick started kneeling during the anthem.

“One of the kids asked, ‘Can we do that?’ I said, ‘As long as we know why we’re doing it, I don’t have a problem with any of it.’”

I wonder if the kids really now “why” I doubt it. The fact is if I were the coach I would have told the kids to talk to their parents, and would never have said go ahead and kneel. I would have no injected my beliefs into it at all. Sadly this coach did not do that. 

The fact is this. It is a lie that cops are shooting Black people and no one is going to jail. That is a false narrative pushed by Black Lives Matter. I bet the coach never offered any balance or context to police shootings. Or Black on Black crime, or the disproportionate rate of violent crime in Black communities, gangs, drugs, absent fathers, or the riots that destroy black-owned businesses in the name of “social justice”. It seems he simply followed the narrative, like a good useful idiot.

Frankly, I will say it again, he shouldn’t have talked about any of that with these kids. That is the role of  parents, and people the parents choose to allow their kids to talk to and ask questions of.  

Again I ask where were these teachers when I was in school?

So, a 16-year-old guy gets to play the horizontal bop with his teacher and now gets rewarded with $750,000? Lucky bastard!

This week’s former high school English teacher who now owes a civil judgment of $750,000 for traumatizing a male teen student with eight sex romps in her car and in her classroom is Erin Sayar.

The sex trauma occurred in 2011. Sayar was a 35-year-old English teacher at New York City’s taxpayer-funded James Madison High School — “excellence in education since 1925” — when she seduced Kevin Eng, her then-16-year-old student, and inflicted the sex ordeal on him.

On Monday, at the end of a one-day bench trial, Judge Miriam Sunshine awarded Eng and his family $250,000 in punitive damages and $500,000 in compensatory damages for the eight sex romps, reports the New York Daily News.

Professor vows to wipe out Whiteness in our time

Your Good Freaking Grief Story of the Day

An assistant professor at the University of Iowa has pledged to devote her classes to making her “mostly white” graduate students aware of their “white privilege.”

Jodi Linley, an education professor at the University of Iowa, detailed her extensive commitment to teaching classes that “deconstruct whiteness” in an academic journal article published Monday, arguing that to do otherwise would make her “complicit” in perpetuating white supremacy and white privilege.

“As a white assistant professor of mostly white graduate students who will become higher education leaders, I work to dismantle whiteness in my curriculum, assignments, and pedagogy,” Linley explains, noting that in addition to her “white identity,” she also draws on her “identities as a queer, able-bodied, cisgender woman” with a working-class background to construct her “teaching paradigm.

Linley says her commitment to designing classes that fight white privilege began as soon as she became a professor in 2014, at which point she resolved to “develop courses that both unveiled and rejected” the notion that “neutrality and objectivity are realistic and attainable.”Such “supposedly neutral” curricula, Linley explains, is a type of teaching that fails to take an active stance against racism and other forms of injustice, thereby intrinsically perpetuating “hegemonic racism, sexism, classism, ableism, cisgenderism, and heterosexism.”

So, she is steeped in studying BS basically. Manufactured “identities” and self-pity 

and self-importance. She should be getting therapy not teaching poisoning students

with her hateful rhetoric.

*VIDEOS* Ben Shapiro And Adam Carolla Testify Before House Committee About Free Speech On Campus (07/27/17)

PART 1

.
PART 2

.
PART 3

.

.

Fascist Starter Kits at University of Maryland demand university crack down on “hate speech”

Of course the new Brown Shirts will be more than happy to define what is hate speech because they love crushing individual liberties

The worst thing about this is that 53,000 plus people have signed this petition to stifle speech because to the Left, discourse is bad

Students at the University of Maryland have drafted a petition demanding that the school ramp up punishments for “hate speech” in the wake of a tragedy on campus.

The Black Student Union published “Honor Richard Collins III and punish hate speech at University of Maryland” after a Black student from Bowie State University, Richard Collins III, was killed by a white UMD student, Sean Urbanski, who was a member of an “Alt-Reich” group on Facebook.

The BSU writes that the lack of consequences for hate speech has emboldened students like Urbanski, arguing that “When consequences for hate speech are not strong it tells students like Sean Urbanski that hate and bigotry is okay!” and that the lack of consequences “makes white supremacist students comfortable on campus.”

Inciting violence is a crime. But the Left does not wish to have such a standard. their standard is to categorize everything they disagree with as “hate speech”. So, pretty much anything that a Conservative or true Liberal might say,  could be, and likely would be deemed hate speech. And those using their natural right to express themselves would be subject to punishment. Here is more

Students in UMD’s Black Student Union, NAACP, Political Latinxs United for Movement and Action in Society, Community Roots, Ethiopian-Eritrean Student Association, National Pan-Hellenic Council, Muslim Political Alliance, American Indian Student Union and Pride Alliance have been pressuring the administration to make it clear that hate speech is not welcomed on UMD’s campus. However, the university has not responded to demands for policy changes that would show a commitment to making the campus safer for Black and other minority groups!

When consequences for hate speech are not strong it tells students like Sean Urbanski that hate and bigotry is okay! It makes white supremacist students comfortable on campus, validated, and creates space for violent, racist attacks like what happened to Richard Collins III to occur.

Well, where are the examples of violent or racist attacks. The petition lists examples of “racism”

– 2007 a noose was found hanging outside the Black cultural center, Nyumburu Cultural Center
-In 2014 students protested the university’s police department hyper- militarization which includes a $65,000 armored truck, 50 M16 rifles, two transport vehicles, and 16 12-gauge shotguns. However all of the police weaponry remains.
-In 2016 UMD campus police broke up an off-campus party of mostly Black students using excessive force and pepper-spray

So, a noose found 10 years ago and the fact that police have weapons, and that campus police once broke up a party are examples of RAAAAACISM? Seriously, who falls for such cheap rhetoric? If racism is so rampant, where are the examples?

What happened to Collins is a tragedy, but the person who perpetrated that murder is very likely is a nutcase. To tie the actions of a lunatic to people sharing political or ideological views is asinine. Of course the Left does asinine very well. In short, these miscreants wish to set themselves up as speech czars, because sometimes discourse is bad

President Loh has continuously reinforced an environment that tolerates hate speech by reducing student organizing efforts and instead encouraging more discourse. Not all situations require more discourse, some call for action!

See, discourse is bad! So says the mouth-breathing knuckle-draggers of the Left.

College campuses are becoming the new home of Fascism

Case in point Evergreen State College where a professor is under fire for calling out the Snowflakes Brown Shirts

Evergreen State College students have berated a professor and called for his resignation after he objected to an event where white students were asked to leave the campus for a day.

Bret Weinstein, a biology professor at the university, sent out an email criticizing the purpose of this year’s “Day Of Absence” event where, unlike in the past, white students and faculty members were asked to leave campus to give space to people of color.

Traditionally, the annual event is characterized by people of color leaving the campus to show their contribution to the campus, while white students and faculty members are attending anti-racism workshops.

“There is a huge difference between a group or coalition deciding to voluntarily absent themselves from a shared space in order to highlight their vital and under appreciated roles … and a group or coalition encouraging another group to go away,” Weinstein wrote in the email.

“I would encourage others to put phenotype aside and reject this new formulation … On a college campus, one’s right to speak—or to be—must never be based on skin color.”

The professors stand in opposition to racism and ignorance of course resonated with the students and they promised to grow up and stop pretending to be victims. Just kidding, they of course demanded Weinstein resign or be fired Here is a video of their ultra tolerant tantrum

Behold the sight of indoctrinated idiots. These students are not capable of civility, reason, or critical thinking. All they see to know is that if anyone, in any way, disagrees with them, then that person is racist/sexist/Homophobic, etc. That person, must resign, be fired, or targeted, literally, until they are no longer willing to stand up to these student bullies. And yes, bullies is the proper term to use. The end game for them is to crush every last shred of dissent. Their ideology, to be frank, is incompatible with Western values, and certainly incompatible with America’s fundamental embracing of natural rights. 

Well, of course math is racist too!

The Pit of Inanity just gets deeper, and deeper, and…….

Progressives are totalitarians. In realms they control, like education, absolutely everything must be conscripted into the service of moonbattery — even math:

Teaching Social Justice through Secondary Mathematics” is a six-week online course designed by Teach for America and offered through EdX, which provides free online classes from top universities such as Harvard University, MIT, and Columbia University. …

Participants in the online course are given sample ideas for lessons they could create, such as using math to teach students about “Unpaid Work Hours in the Home by Gender” and “Race and Imprisonment Rates in the United States.”

The module also identifies five main themes of “intersectional mathematics,” including “mathematical ethics,” which refers to the notion that math is often used as a tool of oppression, according to the instructors.

Five main themes they say? More like five main signs of mental impairment

SJWMathPillars

There really are no words to adequately describe the level of insanity this illustrates. Math is math! Three plus two is five! It is not up for debate is it? Of course this is all part of polluting young minds to see race/oppression/sexism etc in everything.

Remember when segregation was a bad thing?

The Left bastardizes and destroys everything it touches, and race relations is a prime example. There was once a shameful time in America where people were segregated. this segregation was codified into law. But, as with other sins, and faults, American greatness overcame its own shortcomings. Liberals, that is to say actual Liberals, not what passes as “liberal” today helped greatly in turning that tide. Segregation died of its own sickness, and racism began to follow suit. Yes, of course the left would argue that racism is still prevalent in America, but the fact is that America is the most racially tolerant nation on earth. The fact is fewer and fewer people care about color, and more of us judge based on character not color. Yes, there are outliers, there always are. But these outliers are just that. 

But, the Left cannot let this be the narrative, and, they have turned “racism” on its head. Once being color blind, not seeing race as an important factor was once the definition of tolerance. Now, anyone who defines themselves as color blind is attacked as racist. White people? They are all racist, even if they have close friends of different races. So called “White privilege”, which is nothing but another concocted load of bovine excrement, is used to gin up hatred towards White people. Most disturbing is the new push towards a new segregation. Minorities, A.K.A. victim groups are told they need “safe spaces” where no White people are allowed. Discussions of race must exclude anyone that isn’t a member of a “victim group”.

Like everything else, “racism” has been turned on its head by Leftists. Perhaps nothing can better illustrate this despicable campaign of racial segregation than racially segregated graduations at Harvard. Yes, graduations are the modern day version of separate but equal.

Two days before Courtney Woods dresses in a cap and gown for Harvard’s traditional commencement, she will don a stole made of African kente cloth and address the crowd at a somewhat different event: a graduation ceremony for black students.

Student organizers said the event, called Black Commencement 2017, is the first university wide ceremony for black students at Harvard and is designed to celebrate their unique struggles and achievements at an elite institution that has been grappling with its historic ties to slavery.

Unique struggles and achievements? Yes, because Ivy League students are sooooo oppressed! Especially at a school with “ties to slavery”.

“I can only imagine how special I will feel when I walk across that stage and be able to honor my identity and my struggle at Harvard,” said Woods, who is completing a master’s degree at the Graduate School of Education. “I know this is exactly what students like me need to be inspired as we leave this place as emerging global leaders.”

Ah he is “special”. He needs inspiration, as if graduating from Harvard is not inspiring enough. Not if you are suffering from Racial Obsession Syndrome to the point that your “identity” is all about your skin color. How sad, how truly sad. But Black students are not the only “victims” of graduating from Harvard.

Similar ceremonies have been held for Harvard undergraduates as well as for students at Stanford, Columbia, Temple, and other campuses. On May 23, Harvard will also hold its third annual graduation ceremony for students of Latin American descent.

And that is not all, now BGLTQ students can segregate themselves and obsess over their “identity” as well

While there is no corresponding “White Graduation” planned, there will be a “Latinx Graduation Ceremony” offered the same day as Black Commencement, and Harvard’s Office of BGLTQ Student Life also held a “Lavender Graduation” for BGLTQ individuals on April 18, during which graduates were given rainbow stoles.

See! Let’s all separate ourselves and climb into identity cocoons! I wonder what other identities will join this campaign of exclusionary thinking emoting? Let’s see here

How about an Atheist students graduation? They would be safe from any mention of you-know-who by intolerant students who insist on exercising their natural rights of expression and religion.

How about a vegan graduation? No fur, or leather attire allowed, and please eat something before attending because the food will suck!

How about a separate ceremony for left-handed illegal immigrants? As long as we are self-segregating, and we all know how privileged those right-handed undocumented types can be.

Of course, there simply must be a separate ceremony for students who support Sharia Law. No women allowed who are not fully covered of course. And no women grads allowed because women are not to be educated. Also no members of any other faith, and certainly no Gay people, well except those who are going to be thrown from the stage and stoned to death as part of the after graduation revelry. And as an added perk, every graduate gets a “Death to America” stole, and a suicide vest, because tolerance!

Absurd examples? Yes.  But what is Leftism if not absurd?

Your Gutless Appeaser of the Day

So, a student wrote an op-ed about Gay marriage that offended some overly sensitive types that think they have a right not to ever be offended. And, of course, the editor-in-chief Celina Oseguera took the path of appeasement and surrendered to the grievance mongers

As a result of the unrelenting student backlash, the editor-in-chief of Mustang News, Celina Oseguera, issued a public apology for Bartlett’s op-ed, saying his writing “did more harm than start conversation.”

“Publishing this opinion piece has caused this campus and the marginalized groups in it a lot of pain and we are deeply sorry,” she wrote. “We as a staff now realize how naive we can be when addressing issues that affect groups of people with whom we don’t share the same experiences. That was ignorant on our part and we apologize.”

Taking it one step further, though, Oseguera promised to institute an editorial policy in which all “opinion pieces or articles that involve sensitive topics” will first be reviewed by “groups or people whom an opinion piece [could] potentially affect.”

So, this gutless wonder, who lacks any shred of integrity is going to allow the papers opinion pieces to be censored by malcontents. 

“We did not reach out to any individuals that are part of or connected to the LGBTQIA community to read ‘Homosexuality and the slippery slope’ and give us feedback before we published, and for that I also apologize,” Oseguera continued in one of four apologies, noting that as part of the new policy she will reach out to “different communities on campus” in “order to receive feedback on opinion pieces that may affect them.”

Oseguera also invited any “group on campus feels they can teach” her staff to be “more inclusive and informative in [their] writing on these sensitive topic” to reach out to her at her personal email, asking them to pitch her their ideas for how they “would like to make this happen,” evening opening herself up to the “ideas such as diversity workshops for reporters or a session on how to sensitively write about LGBTQIA issues.”

And freedom of speech, and of the press will be hardest hit. This is how Leftism survives folks. Cowards enable the whiners to control the dialogue to a point where no dialogue is possible. If you wish to write, or express any view that might “offend” someone, you must first get their approval? Gee, I wonder what could possibly go wrong? 

A commencement speech graduates could actually use

A much-needed dose of reality from Animal Magnetism

I’m not going to give you any trigger warnings; if you can’t handle what I’m about to say, there’s damn little future for you out there in the real world, so cowboy up.  Moments ago I congratulated you on your day of entry into reality, so to get you started off right, here is a hefty dose of reality for you.

In spite of what you may have been told during all your years of education, nobody owes you anything, and you aren’t special. Any perceived ‘need’ you may have does not entitle you to anything – most especially, not to one red cent of the product of anyone else’s effort. If any of your professors have told you that, then they are economic illiterates, moral frauds or outright charlatans.

Our wonderful Constitution, which has stood for well over two hundred years as the founding document of our Republic, guarantees you the opportunity to your pursuit of happiness. It does not require anyone to provide you the means to your happiness at their expense. You and you alone are responsible for your own life. You have no moral claim on anyone else’s productivity. Accept that fact and you are already one step ahead of most of your peers.

You are entitled to what you have earned through your own efforts, and not:

One.

Damn.

Thing.

More.

Go read the rest, pass it around. It is something that every special snowflake needs to hear. Sadly though, in our overly sensitive, walk around serious issues on tippy toes world, it is a message that is all to rare.

You might not know how bad zero tolerance policies have become

H/T Bearing Arms

OK, let us begin with a picture on Instagram, this picture

13803498_G

For “liking” that photo, of an air soft gun, seventh-grader Zachary Bowlin of Trenton, Ohio was suspended for 10 days. Yes, for “liking” a picture. Paging George Orwell

The notice Bowlin’s parents received explained why their son was being suspended: “The reason for the intended suspension is as follows: Liking a post on social media that indicated potential school violence.”

“I liked it, scrolling down Instagram at night about 7, 8 o’clock I liked it,” Zachary FOX 19“The next morning they called me down [to the office] patted me down and checked me for weapons.”

“I was livid, I mean, I’m sitting here thinking ‘you just suspended him for ten days for liking a picture of a gun on a social media site,” father Marty Bowlin recounted. “He never shared, he never commented, he never made a threatening post… anything on the site, just liked it.”

The school dropped the suspension but sent an email to parents recounting the situation:

Yesterday evening school officials were made aware to an alleged threat of a student bringing a gun to school. We act on any potential threat to student safety swiftly and with the utmost importance. This morning, the alleged threat was addressed and we can assure you that all students at Edgewood Middle School are safe and school will continue as normal. Thank you.

Beth Baumann wonders what will happen to a student who posts about their parents taking them to a gun range

Seriously? A threat of bringing a gun to school? What if *gasp* the student went to the gun range with his parents? Does that make him the next school shooter?

Just imagine how the bed wetting panic mongers might react to a student talking about a weekend trip to the range. What if that student were to post something like a picture of a target on social media, or talk about how their dad was teaching them to shoot. What type of Statist thuggery would such miscreants foist upon that child?

The school superintendent, of course stood by the school’s draconian actions

“Concerning the recent social media posting of a gun with the caption “Ready”, and the liking of this post by another student, the policy at Edgewood City Schools reads as follows:

The Board has a “zero tolerance” of violent, disruptive, harassing, intimidating, bullying, or any other inappropriate behavior by its students.

Furthermore, the policy states:

Students are also subject to discipline as outlined in the Student Code of Conduct that occurs off school property when the misbehavior adversely affects the educational process.

As the Superintendent of the Edgewood City Schools, I assure you that any social media threat will be taken serious including those who “like” the post when it potentially endangers the health and safety of students or adversely affects the educational process.”

This student did not harass anyone, nor did he threaten or bully anyone. And the only “adverse effect” to the educational process was the school’s knee jerk reaction. In fact it might be fairly argued that it was the school bullying and intimidating this student. The only statement made by the egregious overreach is that anyone who enjoys any positive aspect of firearms is to be ostracized, ridiculed, and made out to be a danger to others.

Something must be done about the plaque of zero-tolerance policies. They hurt kids, good kids. This must not stand!

 

Indoctrination’s cost

This young man in the video is, well, deeply stupid, yet because he can regurgitate the Marxist propaganda he has been fed on campus, he, and people like him, are  heralded by the Left as brilliant. No wonder the left pushes for “free college” and college for all. Universities are their number one tool for indoctrination. Here is more on what a destructive force a college education become?

Walter Williams is a national treasure

Syndicated columnist and professor, Walter E. Williams, chastised today’s college snowflakes and the “academic dishonesty” of educators using classrooms to push their political views.

Williams, a Distinguished Professor of Economics at George Mason University where he has taught for 36 years, commented on the differences between his academic experience and those of today’s generation at an award ceremony in Washington, D.C. on Thursday, according to TownHall.

“Many professors, particularly those on the socialistic side of the political spectrum, use their classrooms to proselytize students,” he said. “While professorial proselytization is common and accepted at most universities, I believe that to use one’s classroom to push one’s personal beliefs is both immoral and academic dishonesty.”

Williams was awarded the Bradley Prize from the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation for his lifetime work defending conservative ideals as an educator, author and commentator.

He tipped his hat to his own teachers for “not giving a damn about his self-esteem” and treating him like an adult during his school years. Contrasting his own experiences with the current entitled generation that is coddled and given safe spaces at today’s colleges, Williams noted that many teachers and employers “care more about people’s feelings rather than their performance.”

“It is a cowardly act to take advantage of student immaturity by indoctrinating them with the professor’s opinions before the student has developed the maturity and skill to examine other opinions,” he said.

Go read it all. Walter Williams is a blessing of wisdom in an increasingly foolish world

The Left does not perceive what liberty is

To the Left, liberty is “free” healthcare, and “free” day care, and “free”this and “free” that. And, of course freedom is never  having to hear, or even be exposed to,  an opposing view

A group of Wellesley College professors recently sent a campus-wide email arguing that bringing controversial speakers to campus can cause grave harm to students.

Grave harm? Oh no, not grave harm!

The full letter, which was obtained and published by the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE), was written by six professors who stand on the Wellesley Commission for Race, Ethnicity, and Equity.

Noting that Wellesley has hosted “several guest speakers with controversial and objectionable beliefs” in recent years, the professors say that while the believe free speech is “essential to a liberal arts education…there is no doubt that the speakers in question impose on the liberty of students, staff, and faculty at Wellesley.”

Controversial beliefs? Well, any view, on any topic is going to be “controversial” isn’t it? And yes, someone is going to “object” to some of the things said, or written. How does that put anyone in grave danger? Clearly it does not. Now, the real danger these professors are worried about is this, some of the things these students hear might just make them think! And, to be honest, the left hates people who think, and considers such people dangerous. Thinkers are harder to brainwash, harder to indoctrinate, and harder to control, and the left is about nothing if it is not about control. Thinkers will eventually, likely sooner rather than later, reject Leftism and begin to embrace the ideals of individualism, and personal, that is individual liberty. No wonder these professors are concerned. Their students might begin to embrace something other than the Collectivist non-sense they are force feeding students.

*VIDEO* David Horowitz: Big Agenda – President Trump’s Plan To Save America

.
Click HERE to purchase Mr. Horowitz’s newest book Big Agenda.

.

.

Leftist professor: Black on Black Crime is no big deal

Leftist Racism anyone?

Jack Flotte, a member of Regis University’s Social Justice and Spirituality Committee, opened the session by scolding his white peers and professors on their state of “white fragility,” saying, “Like it or not, we are already accomplices. The question becomes: to what end are we partners in the crime of continuing to perpetuate these systems that dehumanize and oppress people, or are we partners in creating something new?”

Ah the Eternal White Guilt Card, a new tool the Left are using to silence debate

He then outlined several paradigms that he considers counterproductive, starting with the demand that white people “quit mythologizing black-on-black murder by isolating statistics,” boldly claiming that “Black-on-black murder is not a thing. It’s just a bad argument. Black-on-black crime is not a thing. Don’t talk about it. Shut it down when people talk about it.”

Yeah, damn the facts, just attack and silence anyone who uses facts. The Left is going all out to use schools to indoctrinate students.

Teacher fired for teaching

It has come to this

The war of extermination against all things explicitly Southern is no longer in the headlines — yet it continues:

A teacher who displayed the Confederate flag to middle schoolers in his history class was forced to retire amid concerns that he was displaying a symbol of hate.

70-year-old Sutter Middle School (Folsom, CA) teacher Woody Hart hanged both a Confederate flag and a Union flag during his lesson on the Civil War.

The guy was just trying to teach a history class. But context doesn’t matter when it comes to “symbols of hate”:

“We recognize that regardless of context, to many of our students, families, and staff, the Confederate flag is a racist symbol of hate,” [a statement by the Folsom Cordova Unified School District] reads.

Common sense dictates that no one can teach history without touching on unpleasant subjects, symbols, incidents, and historical periods. But, it would seem that the Left prefers students to be offended, and ignorant, not to mention hypersensitized, than to be educated. I would remind everyone that this type of historical Stalinism can be applied, and will increasingly applied to another flag very soon. Yes, the United States flag is as guilty of everything the Confederate flag is guilty of. So, it is simply a matter of time until, well, that United States flag must be banned, lest we offend someone. 

Yes, that time is coming. This is, after all, the Age of the Snowflakes is it not? This the age of silencing any speech, or history, or even discussions or debates that might offend a precious snowflake.

Mother enraged that her child was taught gun safety

Liberals prefer being outraged and offended to be educated

Duval County Public Schools superintendent Dr. Nikolai Vitti has agreed to review other options for a gun safety program in schools after a local mother raised concerns.

Action News Jax first reported Wednesday that a local mother contacted Vitti after her son was taught about gun safety without her permission.

The district acknowledged that the school didn’t send out an “opt out” letter like it’s supposed to. Now, that mother is pushing for a new program altogether because of its affiliation with the National Rifle Association.

It all started after her son brought home a pamphlet promoting gun safety. Not only was she caught off-guard, but she questioned the program’s NRA affiliation.

The NRA’s Eddie Eagle program teaches kids what to do if they find a gun, similar to stop, drop and roll for a fire. Eddie Eagle says stop, don’t touch, run away and tell a grown up.

But a Mandarin Oaks Elementary mother, who doesn’t want to be identified, thinks gun safety shouldn’t be taught by an organization with what she calls “special interests,” and she emailed that concern to Dr. Vitti.

The Eddie Eagle program is as non-partisan as it gets. It is a safety program, period! The fact is, the Eddie Eagle program as the superintendent makes clear is not about any agenda but safety

It is true that the National Rifle Association is part of the consortium that developed the Eddie Eagle program through its outreach office, but its development was guided by specialists in education, public safety, public health, and child development.  This curriculum is not intended to assume your authority to guide your child’s moral development.  Please know that I take nothing more seriously than keeping students safe when they are with us at school, and I hope the messages we provide will help keep them safe when they are away from our classrooms. The program is about gun safety. Information that many students are unaware of and could save their lives.

This mother has a legitimate gripe about an opt-out letter not being sent, but what really bugs her is that the NRA is involved in any way. That is the bottom line. The superintendent makes clear that this is the first complaint he has heard about in his four years at his position.

“I also believe that it is important to note that relying on my memory only, I have never received a complaint from a parent, teacher, SRO, or principal about this program or its expansion since being superintendent (four years). This means that thousands of students each year have been exposed to the program with no issues being raised at my level”

Go read his entire letter, it is good and makes clear that this woman is the only parent to raise any concern. That should be all there is to it, but, sadly, the superintendent loses his guts at the end of his letter

“With all of that said, I am willing to review other options regarding the programming or activities that could be used to promote gun safety because I do believe that its current connection to the NRA could mislead parents. However, to be clear, you are the first parent without digging into the matter who has raised this issue to my level.”

I do not grasp why he would be so very clear about the effectiveness of the program and that he has never received any complaints, and then cave at the end? Our society truly has a hang up about appeasing the loud mouths, and the fringe at times. I have always used common sense in addressing complaints at restaurants I have managed. If, for example, your bar sells thousands of margaritas every month, and you get one complaint, why would you worry about that one outlier? It makes no sense. The same rule applies here, yet, so many people in positions of authority lose their minds over one malcontent.