Feminists be cray cray

Good Freaking Grief! I thought the Left loved them some science?

A feminist professor at the University of California-Davis has vowed to “challenge the authority of Science” by “rewriting knowledge” through a feminist lens.

Sara Giordano, who left the field of neuroscience to become a Women’s Studies professor at UC-Davis, opened up about her feelings towards the sciences in a recent essay for Catalyst, a journal of feminist theory.

Oh yes her feelings…………

Science, she worries, has “earned its epistemic authority through its co-constitution with colonization and slavery,” and therefore “relies on a colonial and racialized form of power.”

Not only is science rooted in racism, she alleges; it has been used to perpetuate racism and colonial practices.

“At the root of the justification for social inequality then is Western science,” she says, claiming that science’s distinction between “humans and non-humans” has allowed  “capitalism [to become] justified as a natural economic system.”

Crazy as a pet coon. Of course she is not alone in her insane rantings. Another brain donor is convinced that algebra is RAAAAACIST!

A math education professor at the University of Illinois argued in a newly published book that algebraic and geometry skills perpetuate “unearned privilege” among whites.

Rochelle Gutierrez, a professor at the University of Illinois, made the claim in a new anthology for math teachers, arguing that teachers must be aware of the “politics that mathematics brings” in society.

Apparently mathematics is too, WHITE! And WHITE is evil or something

“On many levels, mathematics itself operates as Whiteness. Who gets credit for doing and developing mathematics, who is capable in mathematics, and who is seen as part of the mathematical community is generally viewed as White,” Gutierrez argued.

Gutierrez also worries that algebra and geometry perpetuate privilege, fretting that “curricula emphasizing terms like Pythagorean theorem and pi perpetuate a perception that mathematics was largely developed by Greeks and other Europeans.”

Math also helps actively perpetuate white privilege too, since the way our economy places a premium on math skills gives math a form of “unearned privilege” for math professors, who are disproportionately white.

Oh Good Lord! Math is important because people need a basic grasp of math to function! But that is RAAAAACIST! I mean knoweledge is like subjective right?

Gutierrez stresses that all knowledge is “relational,” asserting that “Things cannot be known objectively; they must be known subjectively.”

How deep into the Pit of Leftist Insanity can she go? Look out China!

Brie Larson finds her inner victim

Poor poor Brie Larson. Imagine the horribly horrific horror she endures because she is pretty and men might try getting her number. 

It the wake of the Harvey Weinstein sexual harassment scandal, a number of women have taken to Twitter to share their stories of when men made them feel uncomfortable.

Brie Larson was one of those women, sharing her own “uncomfortable” experience she had at an airport recently.

The Oscar-winning actress, 28, tweeted on Thursday about her experience after she behaved politely toward a TSA agent.

“I merely smiled at a TSA agent and he asked for my phone number,” she wrote. “To live life as a woman is to live life on the defense.”

Is she serious? What is it about Leftists that makes them so consumed with pretending to be victims of some type of discrimination, or  victimization?

Normal people, naturally took Brie to task for her whining petulance

The actress received criticism for the tweet, with on person replying, “OH NO! A guy asked for your number. You poor thing. Women be complaining they don’t find a good guy, but complain when dudes ask for their #.”

Well clearly this insensitive knuckle dragger does not grasp the emotional devastation that this flirtation had on poor, poor, Brie

The star quickly responded writing back,  “You do realize you’re blaming me for a situation I did not ask to be in? A situation that made me uncomfortable?”

Larson continued, “I hope you take the time to learn more about the experience of women. It’s real + scary sometimes and people like you can make it better.”

What Brie Larson experienced was normal, sorry but men are attracted to women. Especially women who are pretty like Brie Larson is, well on the outside anyway. On the inside she is, well, not very pretty at all. I mean claiming that a man asking for her number is harassment is asinine. 

Again, the reality is this. Men flirt with women, and sometimes ask for dates, phone numbers, etc. Women, of course are under no obligation to accept, believe me, I know because I have heard no thank you before. It happens. If a man continues to ask a woman out, or flirt openly, then he ought to get a grip, and stop. But, this is not what happened to Larson. For her to scream harassment only cheapens actual harassment and victims of it.

Lesbian activist seeks to make Wonder Woman hotter and enrage Feminists

Strange bedfellows?

Change.org petition titled “Make Wonder Woman Bisexual” was launched on Monday by one Gianna Collier-Pitts, who identifies as working for LGBT advocacy organization GLAAD.

The petition claims the global hit film starring actress Gal Gadot “was a success for everyone… except the bisexual community.”

So, the bisexual community must have every movies with bisexual leads? More Identity Obsession Disorder for America! And the idiocy deepens

“All I ask is that Warner Bros. directly acknowledge Diana Prince for who she is, who she has always been (regardless of her current love interest), and what her character could potentially represent for millions of people,” the petition concludes.

Hmmm, doesn’t the petitioner grasp that Diana Prince is, fictional, as in not real? But the news might not be all bad. If the next Wonder Woman features Gil Gadot, who is hot getting busy with other hot women, another “community” would be into it too. Men! 

This of course would aggrieve and offend Feminists, who hate to see men have fun. And we all know how entertaining wacky Feminists are when they are pissed, so, bring on the new “improved” Wonder Woman. Here are some suggestions for costars to help Gil Gadot “come out”. Let the Feminist meltdown commence!

Kearran Giovanni

kearran-giovanni

Cote de Pablo

Zeman-Cote-De-Pablo-00001

And yes, Salma Hayek, who could play the arch nemesis of Wonder Woman.

salma-hayek-cannes-15may15-11

Imagine the fun those two could have with that lasso Wonder Woman carries. Yes guys would love that, and Feminists would lose their freaking minds. Sounds like a win win to me

 

Latest threat to mankind? Gendering your pet

r908
Freaking Feminists!

Via Moonbattery

From the feminist revolutionaries at Medusa Magazine:

Pets cannot speak for themselves. They cannot tell you that they are being misgendered. It’s important not to make assumptions about what gender your animal is based off of its sex.

Hold on, it gets even crazier:

Sex and gender are separate things and are in no way intertwined. The sex of your pet is irrelevant. The only time you need to concern yourself with the sex of your pet is when you spay or neuter it (and this begs the question of whether or not we should perform operations on our pets without their consent). Animals can have diverse genders just like humans, and they can have diverse sexualities also.

Owners are advised to give their pets gender-neutral names and use gender-neutral pronouns. You wouldn’t want to offend your pet, which might be a trans-pet.

Also, it’s an important way to practice getting rid of gender norms all together [sic].

Good Freaking Grief! What type of loon thinks up this stuff??

When I say Feminists HATE men, well…….

Are you a man? Do you like sex? Do you enjoy making your partner climax? If you answered yes, then you are a sexist, knuckle dragging pig! H/T Moonbattery

Visiting Cosmopolitan might cause the dumb sensors to overload, so let’s take Daily Wire‘s word for what can be found there:

“It’s not enough that men are already having more orgasms than women. To make matters worse, a new study published in the Journal of Sex Research found — aside from deriving pleasure from their own orgasms, obviously — men also derive a specific sort of masculine pleasure from making female partners orgasm,” complains Cosmo Sex & Relationships editor Hannah Smothers.

Naturally, men enjoy sex more when their female partner has an orgasm; this is what the study has dubbed “masculinity achievement.”

Smothers says that there’s “nothing wrong with feeling good about making your partner feel good” — before explaining why it’s actually “sexist.”

“Despite increasing focus on women’s orgasms, research indicated that the increased attention to women’s orgasms may also serve men’s sexuality, complicating conceptualizations of women’s orgasms as women-centric,” researchers wrote.

In other words Feminists hate men, and hate men to have fun, which is why Feminists make love with their eyes closed. So, even if mean are giving women pleasure, it is still sexist!

Jewish Actress pushes back against noted Anti-Semite

Good for Mayim Bialik, who is hardly a Conservative, but she sees through the hateful rhetoric of  Palestinian-American political activist Linda Sarsour

A recent series of articles about Palestinian-American political activist Linda Sarsour startled many in feminist and Jewish circles, me being one of them. In these articles, Sarsour states that feminism and Zionism are incompatible.

Sarsour said, “There is no country in this world that is immune to violating human rights. You can’t be a feminist in the United States and stand up for the rights of the American woman and then say that you don’t want to stand up for the rights of Palestinian women in Palestine.” (Check out this interview with Sarsour in The Nation.)

Zionism is the belief in the right of the Jewish people to have an autonomous state in Israel. I am a Zionist. Feminism is the belief that a woman-driven movement can bring about race, class and gender equality and that women deserve all of the rights and privileges afforded to men. I am a feminist. There are Zionists who are critical of certain Israeli policies and those who are not; there are Zionists who are anti-occupation and there are Zionists who are pro-settlement; and there are Zionists who fall between these extremes. The definitions of Zionism and feminism are not in conflict with each other. At all.

I would say that it depends on your definition of Feminism. Many Feminists today are for more invested in far-left ideology than in honoring or protecting women and women’s rights. In fact it might be argued that the Left has hijacked Feminism to push Leftist agendas rather than to fight for freedom for women.Bialik does not strike me as one of those “Feminists”. In other words she seems reasonable on the subject of Israel, where as Sarsour is rabidly anti-Israel. Here is more of Bialik

Are there things that happen in Israel and the Palestinian territories which cause pain and suffering to women? Absolutely. And being a Zionist doesn’t mean a definitional indifference to this suffering, especially of Palestinian women and children. The question is this: Many countries – many Muslim countries, in fact – perpetrate atrocities against women which include: female genital mutilation, forced marriages, child brides, systematic abuse of women by the justice system, revenge rape and honor killing. Why is Israel held to a standard none of these other countries – whose offenses are, arguably more extreme – are held to? And why is belief in the State of Israel something that should exclude women – or men, for that matter – from identifying as feminists?

Go read it all, it will give you some hope about having reasonable dialogues with Liberals.

News Flash! Sense of humor is now a hate crime or something

Alternate title, Offendeditis outbreak at American University, Feminists and Snowflakes hardest hit

The College Fix reported:

‘Anti-feminism’ posters at American University investigated as a ‘hate crime’

Law enforcement personnel are searching for the person who hung up “anti-feminism” posters around American University’s campus late Tuesday evening.

The posters parody the recent International Women’s Day as “International Nags [sic] Day,” and include the meme “Stop talking and bitching woman on March 8 and make me a sandwich.”

Rather remarkably, as Fox-5 reports, police are investigating this “vandalism” as a hate crime.

A crime alert was issued to the A.U. community which included photos of the suspect:

Here is the super duper extra offensive poster that some people think should be criminalized. Brace yourself, and make sure no children, or small animals can see the horror….

Oh no, how will our republic survive this? At worst this is in bad taste. To me it is funny, partly because it has some possibly inappropriate elements to it. But also because it is true. Feminism has devolved into angry, irrational hyperbole being screamed by perpetually pissed off “victims”. These women who go heavy into Feminism see discrimination everywhere. Hell they cannot order lunch without seeing the “Patriarchy” somewhere in the experience. But, I must say, I would have really liked these posters to be put up as well

A quick note here, I only put the photo of a hot woman drinking beer because men will like it, and Feminists hate anything that men enjoy.

Lena Dunham Illustrates Leftist Hypocrisy

Lena Dunham, appearing on The View, gives us a glaring look at how intellectually vacuous, and condescending, and completely self-absorbed the Left is. Have a look

Got all of that? White women are singled out as being childish, and selfish. Apparently they need an “empowered” woman like Lena Dunham to set them straight. What would an empowered Dunham tell White women who voted for Trump? Perhaps she could explain how being dependent on government for you health care, birth control, your sustenance, and of course your protection because women guns are bad is somehow empowering for them? She would then have to explain how these women voted against their own interests, and the interest of all women by when they cast votes for Trump? Are all women the very same now? They must all think in lock step to be a “real” woman? That is empowering? Apparently so, because identity politics is all Dunham knows it seems.

Dunham, who goes on left-wing shows like The View and gets praise heaped upon her for being a mind-numbed feminist drone really thinks she is an example of what all women should be. Never mind that she is, basically a brain washed women who has no perceptible talent, well, other than taking her clothes off every five seconds and saying inane things of course. She babbles about people being “at risk” because Trump won, and accuses Trump of not considering Muslims and trans-Americans to be human. She has zero evidence of this of course, but rhetoric must prevail. Facts? Proof of allegations? How dare you question the brilliant Lena Dunham? She is smart, certainly smarter than women who dared vote for Trump. I mean like, don’t they know they must have Dunham tell them how to vote? Stupid White women! Don’t they know their places?

If I could have been on that set, I would have posed this question to Dunham. Who is she to tell women, any woman, how to vote, or what is in their best interests? Are they not allowed to think for themselves?

Now even evil women are victims, as long as they are leftists

And when I say evil, I mean this type of evil

On a Twitter, on a Reddit forum, I stumbled over this horrifying story: Donna Hylton, a woman who spent time in prison for participating in the kidnapping, rape, murder, and ransoming of a gay man, spoke at the Women’s March as an advocate for women of color.

What did this woman do? From Psychology Today, this:

Vigliarole believed the three girls were prostitutes who were going to have sex with him. Instead, they picked him up on March 8 in Elmhurst, Queens, at Maria’s home, and drugged him to make him drowsy. Then they drove him to Selma’s apartment in Harlem. The apartment had already been prepared for an extended torture session: The closet door had been cut, a pot put in it for use as a toilet, the windows boarded.

For the next 15 to 20 days (police aren’t sure just when Vigliarole died), the man was starved, burned, beaten, and tortured. (Even 10 years later, Spurling could recall Rita’s chilling response when they questioned her about shoving a three-foot metal bar up Vigliarole’s rear: “He was a homo anyway.” How did she know? “When I stuck the bar up his rectum he wiggled.”)

The three girls took turns watching the man. It was Donna who delivered a ransom note and tape to a friend of Vigliarole’s, who was able to get a partial license plate number of the car she was driving. He notified the police, who traced the plate to a rental car facility. On April 6 the suspects were arrested, and detectives spent 36 hours straight interviewing the seven men and women. “We had to keep going back and forth and catch them in lies,” said Spurling. “It was a never-ending circle of lies.”

Spurling himself interviewed Donna: “I couldn’t believe this girl who was so intelligent and nice-looking could be so unemotional about what she was telling me she and her friends had done. They’d squeezed the victim’s testicles with a pair of pliers, beat him, burned him. Actually, I thought the judge’s sentence was lenient. Once a jailbird, always a jailbird.”

***

But there was another moment, on our second day together, when she slipped verbally, and said in an almost irritable way, “He [the victim] was going to die anyway, so . . .” and then she caught herself. I just looked at her. All her previous protestations that when arrested she’d had no idea Vigliarole was dead were clearly lies.

But, still she is a victim

Of course, to the Left it does not matter what she did. It only matters that she is a devoted Marxist, and hey, what is a murder when compared to the “struggle” right? After all, she is a victim Prepare for your obligatory moral relativism from the left

The principles behind the Women’s March, things like equal rights and ending violence against women, don’t just matter to women. Women aren’t the only people capable of speaking on the subject, but Hylton brings something very interesting to the table. As Hylton very clearly explains on her website, she’s a women’s rights activist and criminal justice reform advocate. She is a woman. She is black. She was also the victim of abuse as a child and spent a long time in prison after committing a heinous crime.

Hylton’s life experiences are relevant to her causes. A white guy who’s never been to prison might be able to give a great talk about violence against women and inequality, but there’s an understandable draw to hearing about violence and discrimination against women from someone who’s experienced both. There’s an understandable draw to hearing about what happens to black women in the criminal justice system from a black woman who’s been through the criminal justice system. Hylton’s background doesn’t make her positions are any more valid, but even if her conclusions based on her life experiences are dead wrong, her perspective is colored by a very unique and very germane set of life experiences. Her views are worth hearing.

The reasoning in the blog post is dangerous for numerous reasons. Attacking something as huge and diverse as feminism in general or some imagined “Women’s Movement” represented by a single march because of the background of one person involved is the sort of thing that only succeeds with the stupidest among us. To say that such a movement is embracing someone simply by having her speak is misleading.

The point here is that no one who organized, or who is glorifying the “Women’s March” should have welcomed a murderer and kidnapper. The point is that Leftists accuse Trump, and Republicans of being sexist, Homophobic, and so on. They cast these allegations around without a second thought. Yet, they welcome a truly horrible person to join their movement. A person that not only did evil deeds, but actually uses her just punishment to scream about being a victim. In short, the truth is this. No movement can control all of those who attend their events, but they CAN control who they elevate in that movement. They can control who they give prominent positions to.

So, yes, this does say a lot about the Left, and Feminists which are part of the Left. In short, it illustrates that the Left does not value decency, or truth. All that matters to them is a person’s position on issues. To them, Donna Hylton is moral because she holds far left ideals. It does not matter that she took part in awful crimes. Hylton is embraced. Embraced while women who are pro-life, are shunned. Welcomed while any woman who voted for Trump is mocked and demonized. Hylton is praised while women who dare embrace Conservatism, in any way, are raked through the mud.

Stacy McCain ofers this excellent take

All who claim that feminism is about “equality” are either fools are liars. Feminists themselves have made clear that there is no limit to their demands. Give feminists everything they demand today, and tomorrow they will return with a new list of demands. Feminists are totalitarians with a remorseless appetite for power. Feminists are cruel and dishonest, and will tell any lie necessary to achieve their wicked purposes.

The Women’s March on Washington was a vivid expression of how Democrats have harnessed this hate movement for partisan purposes:

Donna Hylton, a woman who spent time in prison for participating in the kidnapping, rape, murder, and ransoming of a gay man, spoke at the Women’s March as an advocate for women of color.

That a criminal psychopath was a leader of this feminist rally — and no one in the liberal media even mentioned her record of hateful violence — tells you a lot about the feminist movement and its ideology. Donna Hylton is not an isolated example, but is altogether typical of the kind of mentally deranged sadists that this movement attracts.

This is what happens when values cease to matter

Feminists: The New Prudes

It seems Feminists wish to be the wardrobe Police

In the fall, actress Karen Gillan came under fire for her skimpy outfit in the upcoming Jumanji movie, in which she stars alongside Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson, Jack Black and Kevin Hart. Now, Gillan is explaining why the outfit actually makes perfect sense.

When Johnson posted the first promotional image of the classic film reboot on social media in September, fans loved the outfits worn by the male cast—and especially Johnson’s tight-fitting shirt and khakis. They were less enthused by Gillan’s midriff-baring crop-top that showed off her physique. Her cargo shorts, they argued, exposed far too much of her legs.

Well, again we see that Feminists wish to empower women to make ONLY choices approved by Feminists. And, again, we see that a big issue here is that Feminists are afraid men will like the outfit. Feminists hate seeing men have fun

Feminists were outraged about how her character’s outfit catered to the “male gaze,” with some even calling it “sexist” and “outdated.” Perhaps they would have liked to measure the length of the exposed skin on her legs with a tape measure to determine if she was “decent.”

Just another example of how the Left is bound and determined to have control of everything everyone does.

Ladies, when the Left Shrieks about empowering you………..

…..what they really desire is to enslave you to a lifetime of government dependence

As you surely know by now, dozens of hardcore leftist organizations participated in a march on Washington to push for all sorts of leftist ideas, like abortion, ‘climate change’, vaginas, pussy’s, flipping people off while grabbing their vaginas, wearing pussy hats telling us they’re empowered (hey, that’s what most of the photos I saw seemed to be pushing). The NY Times has a wonderful collage of photos which conveniently forget most of the Crazy.

Yes, feminists are obsessed with their “lady parts” and with being empowered. Yet, all of that empowerment seems to revolve around having the government pay for the pads, tampons, abortions, birth control. Does anyone else think this odd? Certainly not Leftists like New York Andrew Cuomo, who is all happy to provide the government shackles ladies.

“These regulatory actions will help ensure that whatever happens at the federal level, women in our state will have cost-free access to reproductive health care and we hope these actions serve as a model for equality across the nation,” Cuomo said. “Women deserve to make a fair wage and the same salary as any man, they deserve to work in an office free of sexual harassment, they deserve comprehensive paid family leave, and they deserve control over their health and reproductive decisions.”

Oh Governor Cuomo you lying Leftist you. You, and anyone who thinks about this knows that this has nothing to do with women’s right, or empowerment. In the real world, the more “rights” the government invents, the more it ultimately controls those it “gives” those rights to. The more government provides, the more it controls, and, of course, in Andrew Cuomo’s world that is the goal.

In fact the goal of the Left is always control, it is at the very core of their Collectivist hearts. That is why they focus so much energy into propagandizing Americans into identity based group think. When those groups fall for that re-education, they also fall for the lie that only big government can protect their “rights”, and that thinking as an individual is bad. You must sacrifice your individual identity, and embrace your “identity” as a member of your “group”. Of course, those who are wise reject this notion for what it is, an invitation into slavery to the State.

Here is a great truth you must never forget. Once you willingly sacrifice your individual liberties, you lose every natural right that you possess. That reassuring sound for those that give in to group think is not security, or liberty.

woman-in-jail

It is, instead, the sound of the Collectivist jail cell door closing behind you.

Yeah, Ashley Judd is a crazy as a pet coon

Here you go folks. Proof that Leftism is an ideology for the delusional, bitter, and ignorant

Good Freaking Grief! Is there anything the Left loves more than pretending to be a victim?

Marxist Moron of the Day? Heck, after that incoherent rant, she might be the Marxist Moron of the Decade

Mike Miles has a asks Ashley Judd to imagine

1ninetymileszzxf41tb3eifo1_1280

Noted Lunatic Feminist: White bitches better know their place

Stacy McCain lays bare the lunacy, and Misogyny

A bestselling feminist author told a national conference that “dismantling patriarchy” requires that women must stop listening to white men.

“We have to get white women in order,” Roxane Gay said Friday at the Facing Race conference in Atlanta. “Until women are less invested in what white men think, we aren’t dismantling patriarchy.”

A professor of English at Purdue University, Gay is the author of Bad Feminist, a 2014 New York Times bestseller that is assigned reading in many university Women’s Studies programs. She was a keynote speaker at the Facing Race conference, organized by an anti-white group called Race Forward: The Center for Racial Justice Innovation. The organization’s partisan nature was revealed in a Nov. 9 statement responding to Donald Trump’s election by calling it “the worst outcome we could have imagined . . . a stunning victory for racism, misogyny, homophobia, and vengeful authoritarianism.”

How ironic! The biggest abusers of women are Feminists. They are no better than the sterotypical drunk in a wife beater tank top are they?

Just another reason the Useless Nations is a joke

The United Nations has a long history of being ineffective and, well left of reality. Consider some of the current member of the UN Human Rights Council. China, Communist China with its forced abortions, and limits on how many children Chinese couples may have, and other human rights violations

An estimated 500,000 people are currently enduring punitive detention without charge or trial, and millions are unable to access the legal system to seek redress for their grievances. Harassment, surveillance, house arrest, and imprisonment of human rights defenders are on the rise, and censorship of the Internet and other media has grown. Repression of minority groups, including Tibetans, Uighurs and Mongolians, and of Falun Gong practitioners and Christians who practice their religion outside state-sanctioned churches continues. While the recent reinstatement of Supreme People’s Court review of death penalty cases may result in lower numbers of executions, China remains the leading executioner in the world.

Cuba another Communist nation

Cuba remains one of Latin America’s most politically repressive countries, according to international watchdog group Human Rights Watch (HRW). The group found that political dissidents who criticize the government routinely face criminal prosecution and that government officials use fear tactics including beatings, public shaming and threats of imprisonment to keep naysayers in check.

Reports of arbitrary arrests increased from 2,100 in 2010 to 3,600 in 2013, according to HRW’s 2013report, which also found that arrest orders are hardly ever presented during arrests and detainees may be held for several hours or even days without outside communication. Political prisoners are commonly denied parole after their minimum sentences are completed, the report found, and Cuba’s prisons are overcrowded and unclean, with prisoners who are often malnourished and suffer from illnesses.

Saudi Arabia

Saudi Arabia’s discriminatory male guardianship system remains intact despite government pledges to abolish it. Under this system, ministerial policies and practices forbid women from obtaining a passport, marrying, traveling, or accessing higher education without the approval of a male guardian, usually a husband, father, brother, or son.

Authorities also fail to prevent some employers from requiring male guardians to approve the hiring of adult female relatives or some hospitals from requiring male guardian approval for certain medical procedures for women. In February, a member of the Senior Council of Scholars,  the highest state body for the interpretation of Islamic law, issued a fatwa stating that women are not allowed to visit a male doctor without their male guardians. They are not allowed to expose parts of the body with the exception of a medical emergency.  All women remain banned from driving in Saudi Arabia.

The entire list of nations is here Many of the members are anything but defenders of human rights. And yes, women are likely not exempt from the degradations and mistreatment. But, some “concerned” UN Sstaff members ae saying enough is enough! They have taken a stand and started an onlone petition to reconsider the UN’s choice of Wonder Woman as Honorary Ambassador for the Empowerment of Women and Girls. Wait, what? They cannot be serious can they? I mean with so many real issues with the UN to be outraged over, they lose it over Wonder Woman.

An online petition by concerned UN staff members calls for Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon to reconsider the choice on the grounds that the character is culturally insensitive, overtly sexualized — and not real.
Well, at least they understand that Wonder Woman is not real. But really, how is this petition going to help actual women being brutalized?
“Having strong (living, breathing) female role models is a critical aspect of the goal of empowerment of women and girls,” the petition reads, in part. “If the United Nations would like a list of incredible extraordinary women that would formidably carry out this role, we could surely be able to come up with a list from which the Secretary-General could choose.”
Yes role models are great, invaluable, but it seems the real outrgae here is over Wonder Woman image
The petitioners also pointed to Wonder Woman’s questionable garb as making her an unsuitable UN ambassador.
“Although the original creators may have intended Wonder Woman to represent a strong and independent ‘warrior’ woman with a feminist message, the reality is that the character’s current iteration is that of a large breasted, white woman of impossible proportions, scantily clad in a shimmery, thigh-baring body suit with an American flag motif and knee high boots,” the petition notes.
Yes, that is true, Wonder Woman is hot, and yes, men like her, or at least hot women that dressed like her. No wonder the leftist loons at the UN are upset. I mean Wonder Woman is hot (which enrages Feminists), White (RAAAAACIST), American (America is evil to the Left), and wearing knee high boots. Did I mention that rope she carries to tie people up with? She can lasso me anytime. But more to the point here the real outrage seems to stem from Wonder Woman’s race, national origin, and sexiness, rather than how to help oppressed women around the world. And the UN’s long history of elevating the very worst nations to places of authority? Where is the outrage over that?
This is the Left of course, and they are selective in their outrage. Symbolism and phony outrage are more important than meaningful steps that lead to actual solutions. Frankly, if the United Nations cared about women’s rights, they would hold the West, especially America up as great examples. They would work to help other nation embrace Republican forms of government, and Capitalism. They would reject Totalitarian government as unacceptable, and oppressive. But, this is the Useless Nations, we should never expect anything serious to come from such a body dominated by Leftist ideology.

Feminism is not pro-woman, it is pro Leftism

Feminism, we are told, is about empowering women. Empowering women to make their own choices, control their own bodies, run their own lives. In short then, feminists will tell you that women NEED feminism because of sexism and inequality. That is the message and rhetoric of Feminists, but the truth is quite different. In truth, feminism is about pushing leftism, and embittering, and thus controlling women, thus empowering feminists, and, again, furthering leftist ideology.

Again, if you might be thinking I am way off base here, consider how Feminists walk the walk on “empowering women” to make any choice they wish. Much like the self-appointed civil rights leadership seeks to keep Blacks from thinking for themselves, and leaving the Plantation of Liberal Ideology, feminist leaders seek to keep women “in their place” which, of course is bitter angry, and indoctrinated into the Left’s definition of feminism.

If a woman is pro-abortion, she is empowered. If she dares be pro-life, however, she cannot really be a woman.

If a women speaks “truth to power” on equality, and shrieks constantly about the evil Patriarchy, and sees every male glance or flirt as sexism, she is a member in good standing with feminists. Let a woman speak out and say she likes being attractive to men, or that she sees nothing evil about being flirted with, or complimented by a man, and she is a disgrace.

If a woman rails against traditional gender roles, and marriage (which any good feminist will tell you is rape), and stay at home moms, she is a warrior for social justice. But a woman who defends typical gender roles, and marriage, and raising her kids by actually raising them, then she is called a fool and a traitor to feminism.

If a woman uses her voice to bash the NRA, and gun owners, then she is a valued voice to the Left. But a woman who defends gun ownership, concealed carry, and actually trains with and carries a gun herself, she is bashed. Never mind that such a woman IS the true definition of what feminism ought to be. Such a woman is thinking for herself, and speaking out, and is actually walking the walk. But to feminists, she is a cancer, and must be ostracized and belittled.

In short, being a good feminist means being a woman who toes the lines correctly, and only makes life choices that the Left finds valuable. Consider a few more examples.

A woman should be free to control her own body, unless she wishes to control her own medical insurance and care. Or unless she chooses to pose for pictures men will enjoy, of course. Then she is serving the Patriarchy and betraying women somehow.

A woman must NEVER enjoy being attractive, and any men must never ever look at a woman, or direct any compliment towards a woman’s looks. Somehow noticing that an actress, or news anchor is attractive demeans her intellect somehow. Funny, I never knew that only unattractive people can be smart.  This of course, goes against nature. Men are, by definition attracted to women, and vice-versa. Trying to change that dynamic is as likely to succeed as trying to pet a wolverine is. 

Women must use their voices to help further certain causes, unless those causes are against leftism of course. This is why women like Michelle Malkin, and Stacy Dash and S.E. Cupp, or Katie Pavlich are so savaged by the Left. They do not “know their place”. Odd isn’t it? There is likely no greater form of sexism than feminism. Especially towards very attractive women. And yes, I find the four women I named very attractive, I also find them intelligent and fascinating and admirable. See, you CAN indeed appreciate a woman’s mind, ideals, and looks. Well, unless you are a feminist that is. After all, that whole equality thing is only for women who follow the feminist rules.

UPDATE!! Feminists still put the Bat Shit in Crazy!

Stacy McCain is all over Feminist Nuttery again

A consistent theme of feminist discourse for more than 40 years is a completely negative portrayal of male sexuality. Feminists are united in the opinion that whatever men do in regard to sex is always 100% wrong. Male attraction to women is condemned in feminist rhetoric as “objectification.” If a man admires a woman’s beauty, he has thereby degraded her as a “sex object,” according to feminist theory. If a man verbalizes his interest in a woman, feminists denounce this as “harassment,” and if he expresses his interest in a woman by any physical action — a kiss or a hug — feminists consider this sexual assault. Of course, feminists consider heterosexual intercourse to be inherently oppressive, a violent act of male domination — “PIV is always rape, OK?”

How deep are they in The Pit of Eternal Feminist Bitterness? This deep, and digging as fast as they can

“Men are the enemy. Heterosexual women are collaborators with the enemy. . . .
“We see heterosexuality as an institution of male domination, not a free expression of personal preference.”
Leeds Revolutionary Feminists, 1981

“Men affirm male superiority through use of the penis as a weapon against the female. . . .
“Because men want women’s sexual services for themselves only . . . men make women’s heterosexuality compulsory.”
Dee Graham, et al., Loving to Survive: Sexual Terror, Men’s Violence, and Women’s Lives (1994)

“Far from being ‘natural,’ phallic sexuality is a moral and political activity. . . . Men’s sexual behaviour is not caused by hormonal dictates. . . . Anything and everything must be subordinated to penile activity if men are to be what phallic ideology requires them to be.”
Denise Thompson, Radical Feminism Today (2001)

Go read it all, but have a bottle of good Irish whiskey close at hand to ward off evil Feminut spirits!

Remember my last post, when I said Feminists are Cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs?

Here is another great analysis of modern day Feminism by Stacy McCain. Go read it all, it is worth your time, especially if you plan to send your daughter to college. Here is a small sample

But now let’s return to Ms. Airaksinen’s personal account of campus feminism:

My indoctrination into the feminist orthodoxy began when I was 15 and still in high-school, while taking classes at Cleveland State University. I signed up for Women’s Studies courses, and after reading books written by feminist luminaries like Gloria Steinem, I was hooked.
In one year, I took three Women’s Studies classes. My professors taught me that, because I was a woman, I was victimized and oppressed. Prior to enrolling, I did not see myself that way. Students were told that we are supposed to be angry. Rage was a “normal” reaction. To dismantle the systems of oppression, confrontation was required. For me, and many of my peers, these classes made us feel heady with righteousness. . . .

Again, I will interrupt Ms. Airaksinen (because I’m a patriarchalmansplainer like that) to remind you how my Sex Trouble series has highlighted the Feminist-Industrial Complex of Women’s Studies programs. Some 90,000 U.S. students annually undergo the “indoctrination into the feminist orthodoxy” Ms. Airaksinen describes, and anyone who examines Women’s Studies textbooks (e.g., Feminist Frontiers, edited by three lesbian professors) understands how these courses teach young women that they are “victimized and oppressed” and that they “are supposed to be angry” about these “systems of oppression.” It’s not just the elite schools, either. Cleveland State has a Women’s Studies department that offers both a major and minor in studying “the role of gender in shaping human societies of the past and the present.” This interdisciplinary program includes such courses as “Psychology of Women” (PSY 255), “Race, Class and Gender” (SOC 201), “Sociology of Gender” (SOC 317), “Gender Issues in Literature” (ENG 363), “American Sexual Communities and Politics” (HIS 327), “Class, Gender and Sexuality in China” (HIS 381), and “Women and the Goddess in Asian Religions” (REL 363). The department’s interim director, Professor Mary Ellen Waithe, is editor of the 4-volume series A History of Women Philosophers. In 2010, Professor Waithe’s salary was $88,567, whereasmedian household income in Cleveland is $26,217. So the Women’s Studies director is paid more than three times the annual income of the average Cleveland family and runs a program that teaches college girls to view themselves as victims of “systems of oppression.”

Nice work, if you can get it.

Toni Airaksinen became disillusioned with Women’s Studies at Cleveland State, but found an even worse climate at Barnard College:

I did not set out to attend a women’s college. However, as a first-generation student from a welfare household, I was on the hunt for colleges with generous financial aid. Barnard fit the bill. I brushed off my prior uncomfortable entanglements with feminism (or “social justice,” the more inclusive term), and gave it another chance at Barnard. However, not only did the same paradigms manifest themselves that I saw in my classes at Cleveland State, in fact, it was worse. The overarching narrative of victimhood and vulnerability pervaded itself through all parts of campus life, from the school newspaper to the conversations I had with other students.
My first week, for example, I was warned never to go to “East Campus” — the Columbia University residence hall where “all the rapists live.” [It is important to note that Barnard and Columbia share a campus and have intertwined academics] Men were all potential rapists, especially Columbia men. When I brought up the fact that I was probably more likely to be assaulted while in my urban home neighborhood than on the pristine Columbia campus to a friend, I was told I was definitely wrong. “Columbia protects rapists,” and “rapists live here,” I was told. My rebuttals and questions fell on deaf ears.

Again, parents be careful when you send your daughter to college, lest they fall victim to the cultish emoting and perpetual bitterness radical Feminists exhibit. Don’t let your daughters grow up to be like this

AndreaDworkin
“Women are a degraded and terrorized people. Women are degraded and terrorized by men. … Women’s bodies are possessed by men. … Women are an enslaved population. … Women are an occupied people.” — Andrea Dworkin, 1977 speech at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst, in Letters from a War Zone (1993)

Like I said, CUCKOO FOR COCOA PUFFS

Your Daley Gator Leftist Annoyance O’ The Day (Video)

Feminist Scream Singing – Moonbattery

What will be left when progressives have finished subverting, corroding, and finally destroying every aspect of Western Civilization? Will we have no culture at all?

Not at all. We will have moonbat culture. For example, in place of Mozart’s Requiem, we will have this:
.

.

.

*VIDEO* Things End Badly For Topless Feminists Who Try To Crash Muslim Conference In France

.
To add insult to injury, the protesters were arrested, and the event’s organizers have stated that they will be pressing charges.

.

.

Your CRAZY ASS FEMINUT of the DAY!

Layers and layers of crazy, topped with more crazy! Via Moonbattery

The College Fix serves up a dose of Julie Bindel, a research fellow at the University of Lincoln and frequent contributor to The Guardian and Sunday Telegraph:

I mean, I would actually put them all [i.e., all men] in some kind of camp where they can all drive around in quad bikes, or bicycles, or white vans. I would give them a choice of vehicles to drive around with, give them no porn, they wouldn’t be able to fight – we would have wardens, of course! Women who want to see their sons or male loved ones would be able to go and visit, or take them out like a library book, and then bring them back.

I hope heterosexuality doesn’t survive, actually. I would like to see a truce on heterosexuality. I would like an amnesty on heterosexuality until we have sorted ourselves out. Because under patriarchy it’s sh**.

And I am sick of hearing from individual women that their men are all right. Those men have been shored up by the advantages of patriarchy and they are complacent, they are not stopping other men from being sh**.

I would love to see a women’s liberation that results in women turning away from men and saying: “when you come back as human beings, then we might look again.”

See? Feminism = Crazy!