There go the leftists again………..

Apparently the “pussy hat”is now RAAAAACIST

Members of the Women’s March movement are no longer grabbing their trademark pink “pussy hats” out of concern they might be offensive to minorities and transgender women.

Following Donald Trump’s inauguration, marchers donned pink cat ears, a mocking reference to the president’s hot mic comments saying that he enjoyed grabbing women by the “pussy.”

But the Detroit Free Pressreports that women activists in Michigan and elsewhere are making a conscious effort to move away from the hat out of fear that it “excludes and is offensive to transgender women and gender nonbinary people who don’t have typical female genitalia and to women of color because their genitals are more likely to be brown than pink.”

“I personally won’t wear one because if it hurts even a few people’s feelings, then I don’t feel like it’s unifying,” said Phoebe Hopps, the founder of Women’s March Michigan. “I care more about mobilizing people to the polls than wearing one hat one day of the year.”

I love that last comment. She wants to “unify” yet she backs a group that engages in vitriolic and divisive rhetoric directed at anyone who disagrees with its message? Talk about stuck on stupid.

Feminists be cray cray

Good Freaking Grief! I thought the Left loved them some science?

A feminist professor at the University of California-Davis has vowed to “challenge the authority of Science” by “rewriting knowledge” through a feminist lens.

Sara Giordano, who left the field of neuroscience to become a Women’s Studies professor at UC-Davis, opened up about her feelings towards the sciences in a recent essay for Catalyst, a journal of feminist theory.

Oh yes her feelings…………

Science, she worries, has “earned its epistemic authority through its co-constitution with colonization and slavery,” and therefore “relies on a colonial and racialized form of power.”

Not only is science rooted in racism, she alleges; it has been used to perpetuate racism and colonial practices.

“At the root of the justification for social inequality then is Western science,” she says, claiming that science’s distinction between “humans and non-humans” has allowed  “capitalism [to become] justified as a natural economic system.”

Crazy as a pet coon. Of course she is not alone in her insane rantings. Another brain donor is convinced that algebra is RAAAAACIST!

A math education professor at the University of Illinois argued in a newly published book that algebraic and geometry skills perpetuate “unearned privilege” among whites.

Rochelle Gutierrez, a professor at the University of Illinois, made the claim in a new anthology for math teachers, arguing that teachers must be aware of the “politics that mathematics brings” in society.

Apparently mathematics is too, WHITE! And WHITE is evil or something

“On many levels, mathematics itself operates as Whiteness. Who gets credit for doing and developing mathematics, who is capable in mathematics, and who is seen as part of the mathematical community is generally viewed as White,” Gutierrez argued.

Gutierrez also worries that algebra and geometry perpetuate privilege, fretting that “curricula emphasizing terms like Pythagorean theorem and pi perpetuate a perception that mathematics was largely developed by Greeks and other Europeans.”

Math also helps actively perpetuate white privilege too, since the way our economy places a premium on math skills gives math a form of “unearned privilege” for math professors, who are disproportionately white.

Oh Good Lord! Math is important because people need a basic grasp of math to function! But that is RAAAAACIST! I mean knoweledge is like subjective right?

Gutierrez stresses that all knowledge is “relational,” asserting that “Things cannot be known objectively; they must be known subjectively.”

How deep into the Pit of Leftist Insanity can she go? Look out China!

Brie Larson finds her inner victim

Poor poor Brie Larson. Imagine the horribly horrific horror she endures because she is pretty and men might try getting her number. 

It the wake of the Harvey Weinstein sexual harassment scandal, a number of women have taken to Twitter to share their stories of when men made them feel uncomfortable.

Brie Larson was one of those women, sharing her own “uncomfortable” experience she had at an airport recently.

The Oscar-winning actress, 28, tweeted on Thursday about her experience after she behaved politely toward a TSA agent.

“I merely smiled at a TSA agent and he asked for my phone number,” she wrote. “To live life as a woman is to live life on the defense.”

Is she serious? What is it about Leftists that makes them so consumed with pretending to be victims of some type of discrimination, or  victimization?

Normal people, naturally took Brie to task for her whining petulance

The actress received criticism for the tweet, with on person replying, “OH NO! A guy asked for your number. You poor thing. Women be complaining they don’t find a good guy, but complain when dudes ask for their #.”

Well clearly this insensitive knuckle dragger does not grasp the emotional devastation that this flirtation had on poor, poor, Brie

The star quickly responded writing back,  “You do realize you’re blaming me for a situation I did not ask to be in? A situation that made me uncomfortable?”

Larson continued, “I hope you take the time to learn more about the experience of women. It’s real + scary sometimes and people like you can make it better.”

What Brie Larson experienced was normal, sorry but men are attracted to women. Especially women who are pretty like Brie Larson is, well on the outside anyway. On the inside she is, well, not very pretty at all. I mean claiming that a man asking for her number is harassment is asinine. 

Again, the reality is this. Men flirt with women, and sometimes ask for dates, phone numbers, etc. Women, of course are under no obligation to accept, believe me, I know because I have heard no thank you before. It happens. If a man continues to ask a woman out, or flirt openly, then he ought to get a grip, and stop. But, this is not what happened to Larson. For her to scream harassment only cheapens actual harassment and victims of it.

Lesbian activist seeks to make Wonder Woman hotter and enrage Feminists

Strange bedfellows?

Change.org petition titled “Make Wonder Woman Bisexual” was launched on Monday by one Gianna Collier-Pitts, who identifies as working for LGBT advocacy organization GLAAD.

The petition claims the global hit film starring actress Gal Gadot “was a success for everyone… except the bisexual community.”

So, the bisexual community must have every movies with bisexual leads? More Identity Obsession Disorder for America! And the idiocy deepens

“All I ask is that Warner Bros. directly acknowledge Diana Prince for who she is, who she has always been (regardless of her current love interest), and what her character could potentially represent for millions of people,” the petition concludes.

Hmmm, doesn’t the petitioner grasp that Diana Prince is, fictional, as in not real? But the news might not be all bad. If the next Wonder Woman features Gil Gadot, who is hot getting busy with other hot women, another “community” would be into it too. Men! 

This of course would aggrieve and offend Feminists, who hate to see men have fun. And we all know how entertaining wacky Feminists are when they are pissed, so, bring on the new “improved” Wonder Woman. Here are some suggestions for costars to help Gil Gadot “come out”. Let the Feminist meltdown commence!

Kearran Giovanni

kearran-giovanni

Cote de Pablo

Zeman-Cote-De-Pablo-00001

And yes, Salma Hayek, who could play the arch nemesis of Wonder Woman.

salma-hayek-cannes-15may15-11

Imagine the fun those two could have with that lasso Wonder Woman carries. Yes guys would love that, and Feminists would lose their freaking minds. Sounds like a win win to me

 

Latest threat to mankind? Gendering your pet

r908
Freaking Feminists!

Via Moonbattery

From the feminist revolutionaries at Medusa Magazine:

Pets cannot speak for themselves. They cannot tell you that they are being misgendered. It’s important not to make assumptions about what gender your animal is based off of its sex.

Hold on, it gets even crazier:

Sex and gender are separate things and are in no way intertwined. The sex of your pet is irrelevant. The only time you need to concern yourself with the sex of your pet is when you spay or neuter it (and this begs the question of whether or not we should perform operations on our pets without their consent). Animals can have diverse genders just like humans, and they can have diverse sexualities also.

Owners are advised to give their pets gender-neutral names and use gender-neutral pronouns. You wouldn’t want to offend your pet, which might be a trans-pet.

Also, it’s an important way to practice getting rid of gender norms all together [sic].

Good Freaking Grief! What type of loon thinks up this stuff??

When I say Feminists HATE men, well…….

Are you a man? Do you like sex? Do you enjoy making your partner climax? If you answered yes, then you are a sexist, knuckle dragging pig! H/T Moonbattery

Visiting Cosmopolitan might cause the dumb sensors to overload, so let’s take Daily Wire‘s word for what can be found there:

“It’s not enough that men are already having more orgasms than women. To make matters worse, a new study published in the Journal of Sex Research found — aside from deriving pleasure from their own orgasms, obviously — men also derive a specific sort of masculine pleasure from making female partners orgasm,” complains Cosmo Sex & Relationships editor Hannah Smothers.

Naturally, men enjoy sex more when their female partner has an orgasm; this is what the study has dubbed “masculinity achievement.”

Smothers says that there’s “nothing wrong with feeling good about making your partner feel good” — before explaining why it’s actually “sexist.”

“Despite increasing focus on women’s orgasms, research indicated that the increased attention to women’s orgasms may also serve men’s sexuality, complicating conceptualizations of women’s orgasms as women-centric,” researchers wrote.

In other words Feminists hate men, and hate men to have fun, which is why Feminists make love with their eyes closed. So, even if mean are giving women pleasure, it is still sexist!

Jewish Actress pushes back against noted Anti-Semite

Good for Mayim Bialik, who is hardly a Conservative, but she sees through the hateful rhetoric of  Palestinian-American political activist Linda Sarsour

A recent series of articles about Palestinian-American political activist Linda Sarsour startled many in feminist and Jewish circles, me being one of them. In these articles, Sarsour states that feminism and Zionism are incompatible.

Sarsour said, “There is no country in this world that is immune to violating human rights. You can’t be a feminist in the United States and stand up for the rights of the American woman and then say that you don’t want to stand up for the rights of Palestinian women in Palestine.” (Check out this interview with Sarsour in The Nation.)

Zionism is the belief in the right of the Jewish people to have an autonomous state in Israel. I am a Zionist. Feminism is the belief that a woman-driven movement can bring about race, class and gender equality and that women deserve all of the rights and privileges afforded to men. I am a feminist. There are Zionists who are critical of certain Israeli policies and those who are not; there are Zionists who are anti-occupation and there are Zionists who are pro-settlement; and there are Zionists who fall between these extremes. The definitions of Zionism and feminism are not in conflict with each other. At all.

I would say that it depends on your definition of Feminism. Many Feminists today are for more invested in far-left ideology than in honoring or protecting women and women’s rights. In fact it might be argued that the Left has hijacked Feminism to push Leftist agendas rather than to fight for freedom for women.Bialik does not strike me as one of those “Feminists”. In other words she seems reasonable on the subject of Israel, where as Sarsour is rabidly anti-Israel. Here is more of Bialik

Are there things that happen in Israel and the Palestinian territories which cause pain and suffering to women? Absolutely. And being a Zionist doesn’t mean a definitional indifference to this suffering, especially of Palestinian women and children. The question is this: Many countries – many Muslim countries, in fact – perpetrate atrocities against women which include: female genital mutilation, forced marriages, child brides, systematic abuse of women by the justice system, revenge rape and honor killing. Why is Israel held to a standard none of these other countries – whose offenses are, arguably more extreme – are held to? And why is belief in the State of Israel something that should exclude women – or men, for that matter – from identifying as feminists?

Go read it all, it will give you some hope about having reasonable dialogues with Liberals.