The Radical Left Embraces their inner ISIS

After reading this piece at Medium, I just have to ponder at how far the religion, nay, fanaticism of the radical leftism will go. Please go read the whole thing (you might need a hazmat suit). It is long, rambling, angry, and largely incoherent. But it reveals a growing tumor of unbridled hatred towards White people. A hatred that calls for the killing of White babies and the death of the White family  A hatred that vilifies police. A hatred wrapped in a campaign of creating as many people who are perpetually angry, bitter and a campaign which increasingly justifies and calls for violence. Where does that anger and bigotry lead? Really how far removed are calls for White women to abort their babies, and ending White families, and justifying riots, looting, and attacks on police from what ISIS is about? Here are a couple of excerpts from the rantings of Son of Baldwin

I may not be suggesting that we go out and start a war that we are certain to lose if only because the bigots have all the armaments, all the firepower, all the militaries, all the institutions; and their hearts are afire with the pure hatred that energizes them, seemingly infinitely; and they outnumber us in every corner of the known world.

What I am suggesting will rile us because it operates contrary to our centuries of brainwashing, rejects the religious instruction our oppressors gave us, negates the mounds of propaganda that imagines our oppressors as deserving of our humanity in the face of their lack of such. What I propose will certainly have most white/cisgender/heterosexuals who practice bigotry (or do not believe they practice bigotry even when they do) up in their outrageous feelings because they have become accustomed to our worship, rely on our fealty, and receive sustenance from our sacrifice. They want us as Django Unchained’s Stephen, infinitely and perpetually servile, or as the punchline to their malicious humor, laughing along with them.

Our indifference to their well-being is the only thing that terrifies them.

If you are thinking that this is completely irrational then you are correct. This person is simply regurgitating the same vile propaganda he has been brainwashed with. Here is where his hate and rage really shows

If you see them drowning.

If you see them in a burning building.

If they are teetering on the edge of a cliff.

If their ships are sinking.

If their planes are crashing.

If their cars are skidding.

If they are overdosing.

If their hearts have tellingly arrested.

If they are choking in a restaurant.

If they are bleeding out in an emergency room.

If the ground is crumbling beneath them.

If they are in a park and they turn their weapons on each other:

Do nothing.

Saving the life of those that would kill you is the opposite of virtuous.

Let. Them. Fucking. Die.

And smile a bit when you do.

For you have done the universe a great service.

Shocking yes, but it is a tone and rhetoric you hear more and more often. And yes, it is rhetoric which forces me to ask how far removed from ISIS, or Hamas, or any other terror group are those who write such evil filth? How far removed is “let them fucking die” from make them die? 

Be sure to read the comments to his screed. Very sobering that such hatred could even exist in a free nation.

*AUDIO* Mark Steyn: Trump Vs. The Global Warming Lunatics

.

.

Special Snowflakes? More like Fascists

It is time to start calling these miscreants what they are, Fascists!

In an open letter to outgoing Pomona College President David Oxtoby, a group of students from the Claremont Colleges assail the president for affirming Pomona’s commitment to free speech and demand that all five colleges “take action” against the conservative journalists on the staff of the Claremont Independent.

What did Oxtoby do to upset these little Brown Shirts?

“Protest has a legitimate and celebrated place on college campuses,” Oxtoby wrote. “What we cannot support is the act of preventing others from engaging with an invited speaker. Our mission is founded upon the discovery of truth, the collaborative development of knowledge and the betterment of society.”

So, in short, he took a stand for freedom of speech. This upset these Stalinist starter kits

“Free speech, a right many freedom movements have fought for, has recently become a tool appropriated by hegemonic institutions. It has not just empowered students from marginalized backgrounds to voice their qualms and criticize aspects of the institution, but it has given those who seek to perpetuate systems of domination a platform to project their bigotry,” they write.

“Thus, if ‘our mission is founded upon the discovery of truth,’” the students continue, citing Oxtoby’s letter, “how does free speech uphold that value?”

See? Only these students possess the “truth”, therefore we must allow them to control and censor speech. And if you think they would censor anything that made any sense, well………….

“Historically, white supremacy has venerated the idea of objectivity, and wielded a dichotomy of ‘subjectivity vs. objectivity’ as a means of silencing oppressed peoples,” they explain. “The idea that there is a single truth–‘the Truth’–is a construct of the Euro-West that is deeply rooted in the Enlightenment, which was a movement that also described Black and Brown people as both subhuman and impervious to pain. This construction is a myth and white supremacy, imperialism, colonization, capitalism, and the United States of America are all of its progeny. The idea that the truth is an entity for which we must search, in matters that endanger our abilities to exist in open spaces, is an attempt to silence oppressed peoples.”

Good Freaking Grief. The truth is whatever they decide it is at any particular time then. How very convenient for them. When I say Leftism is an ideology of convenience, this is what I mean. Their ideal of many “truths” allows them to always steer clear of any substantive debate. Thus they would never have to actually debate Heather Mac Donald, whom they loathe because she actually speaks the truth

“Heather Mac Donald is a fascist, a white supremacist, a warhawk, a transphobe, a queerphobe, a classist, and ignorant of interlocking systems of domination that produce the lethal conditions under which oppressed peoples are forced to live,” the letter claims. “Why are you [President Oxtoby], and other persons in positions of power at these institutions, protecting a fascist and her hate speech and not students that are directly affected by her presence?”

Wow, their hate really shows doesn’t it? These little miscreants must not be appeased.

Liberal tolerance strikes again

Listening to Dennis Prager today, he said that the biggest cowards can be found on today’s college campuses and classrooms. He is right again

Nearly 100 Santa Clara University professors are angry with the administration’s decision to override the Student Senate’s rejection of a Turning Point USA chapter.

Over a month ago, the SCU Student Senate declined to recognize TPUSA after several students called the club a “direct threat” and decried its ties to the national organization, which had been mentioned in a PowerPoint presentation on white supremacist organizations delivered by the Senate’s staff advisor the previous week.

After reviewing the Senate vote, the Vice Provost overturned the decision, explaining that debate over the club’s political leanings is not a valid reason to deny its members their rights to freedom of speech and association.

However, 86 professors have now signed an open letter in The Santa Clara decrying the administration’s decision to recognize TPUSA, claiming that the Student Senate’s autonomy trumps the right of TPUSA to establish a chapter on campus.

The Leftists on college campuses are terrified of any debate, dissent, or any challenge to their dictatorial attitudes about what is and is not acceptable. The Vice Provost showed some guts here, let’s see what price they pay

*VIDEO* David Horowitz: Big Agenda – President Trump’s Plan To Save America

.
Click HERE to purchase Mr. Horowitz’s newest book Big Agenda.

.

.

Joy Villa wore Trump dress to protest Hollywood Brown Shirt attitude

joy-villa

A quick note here, Villa did not use the term Brown Shirts, those are my words, not Villa’s. Regardless, a big salute to Villa for standing up to the “suppressors”

Speaking in a Breitbart News interview, Joy Villa, the singer who wore a news-making pro-Trump dress at Sunday night’s Grammy Awards, said she was motivated by the drive to change Hollywood’s “suppressive atmosphere” toward Trump supporters.

Saying you support Trump “should not be something that is almost illegal in this society,” Villa said. “And that’s what it felt like. It felt like a suppressive atmosphere,” she said, referring to Hollywood.

“I was tired of the bullying,” she said in a phone interview. “I was tired of being pushed down so that I couldn’t say my beliefs. And being fearful of losing sales. Losing fans. Losing bookings. Losing contracts and sponsorship. You know, that’s my day to day. And a lot of my friends have the same thing. And we live in Hollywood, which is supposed to be the most open viewpoint city. But the truth is there was a lot of hate and a lot of negativity and I wanted to change the storyline to love and support and unity as an American.”

Undeniable Truth Time! The Left Destroys Everything it Touches

And yes, that includes, or soon will, the Boy Scouts. William Teach explains

In his book SJWs Always Lie, Vox Day laid out a few principles on how to deal with Social Justice Warriors. One of them is to never, ever, give in, because they’ll use that to beat you up and demand even more. It would have been good advice for the Boy Scouts, who have already capitulated to demands to allow gay scouts and scout masters, then on allowing the gender confused in

Women’s Group Calls On Boy Scouts To Allow Girls To Join

Is a Boy Scout still a Boy Scout when the scout is a girl?

That’s the question facing the Boy Scouts of America, which recently opened their ranks to gay and transgender boys and now faces another long-simmering membership dispute: a long-shot campaign to let girls join the BSA so they have a chance to earn the prestigious status of Eagle Scout.

While girls are allowed into some programs, they are still banned from competing for the Eagle Scout rank, joining Cub Packs or Scout Troops, joining the Boy Scout honor society, and earning Merit Badges.

Just last week, after the BSA announced it would admit transgender boys, the National Organization for Women issued a statement urging the youth organization to allow girls to join.

Of course, if girls are allowed in there will cease to be a Boy Scouts of America. The Left, of course says that this a fight for “equality” and “fairness”, but, in truth, it is about destroying everything, every last thing traditional and good. The Left targeted the BSA years ago, and every concession made to them by the BSA has led to more demands, and threats. The BSA should have stood their ground long ago, now, they have little ground to take any stand on.