Sarah Silverman is a professional idiot, do not try this at home

Oh no, babbling idiot Sarah Silverman has a boyfriend who had an American flag, that triggered her Downtrend has the story

On her show I Love You, America With Sarah Silverman, she proves without a doubt that her program is deceptively titled with this little anecdote:

“I had a boyfriend many years ago, he was my first boyfriend who had his own house, and one day I went outside to see what he was doing, and he was hoisting an American flag up the flagpole in his front yard. And I instantly felt very weird. It didn’t make sense, but I felt this feeling of like, um, I felt scared – yeah, I felt scared. So I was like, ‘Uh, what are you doing?’ and he said, ‘Raising the flag,’ and I was like, ‘Why?’ and he’s like, ‘Um, because I love America?’ and I was like, ‘Right, right, of course.’ But inside I was shaken,” started Silverman.

But wait, it gets worse when she is able to identify the source of her disturbing feelings:

“I called my sister Susie to tell her what happened. Now, maybe you’re thinking, ‘What do you mean what happened? Nothing happened, your boyfriend put an American flag up at his own house.’ No, you’re totally right, I had no idea why I was freaking out. I just – I had this very visceral reaction and my sister, who knows shit because she’s a rabbi in Israel, explained to me, she was like, ‘Dude, nationalism is innately terrifying for Jews. Think about it: flags, marching, blind allegiance? These things tend to ring a bell for us.’ Right. Of course. Duh. It made sense,” said Silverman.

So, national pride = Nationalism = Nazism = anti=-Semitism? Good Freaking Grief!

Why Rudolph you Red-Nosed RAAAAACIST!

Via Moonbattery

Nothing is so ideologically pure that it cannot be denounced for political incorrectness, especially if it is associated with Christmas — not even Rudolf the Red-Nosed Reindeer:

HuffPost accused the film of racism, sexism, homophobia, and every sort of bigotry — not realizing that the movie actually condemns these attitudes toward “misfits.”

The movie is rife with scenes of marginalization, but HuffPost takes them absurdly out of context.

Rudolph’s father Donner “verbally abuses him”; Santa Claus mocks Donner for his son’s nose; the school coach encourages bullying; Donner forbids his wife from joining the search for his son, saying: “No. This is man’s work”; Rudolph’s girlfriend Clarice has a bigoted father; and “even the elf is an outcast for wanting to be a dentist.” …

But the movie doesn’t end there. In fact, “Rudolph” has the main character and his elf friend prove themselves, and receive honor — and heartfelt apologies — from Santa, Donner, and the insulting elf. … [T]he bullying was not the point — the vindication was the point.

That won’t do for HuffPost social justice warriors.

It’s … not enough unless the bullies are trampled and the marginalized take power.

You simply cannot make it up

Your Marxist Moron of the Day

The Left has never, and will never grasp the concept of Natural Rights

 Rep. Marjorie Decker, a Cambridge Democrat, made at the hearing as she was testifying in support of various gun control measures and against bills she said would erode Massachusetts’ status as the state with the lowest rate of gun deaths.

“It is a privilege that we allow individuals to hold onto something that causes harm and death,” Decker said. “It is a privilege to have a car license, it is a privilege to have a gun license.”

Jim Wallace, executive director of the Gun Owners Action League, said Decker’s comment illustrated frustrations lawful gun owners feel in Massachusetts.

“One of the problems that we face here in Massachusetts is that the Second Amendment is barely recognized in the state as a whole and certainly not as a civil right. I could not have asked for a better witness to that than the previous legislator that actually described our civil rights as a privilege,” Wallace said. “I am aghast that an elected official would actually say that … but that’s not unusual.”

Can you say unfit to serve?

Your Marxist Moron of the Day

Dave Blount at Moobattety finds a jewel of stupidity!

DUH!

Notice the shirt. Che Guevara was chief executioner for Fidel Castro’s monstrous regime. He is the direct corollary of Heinrich Himmler: the guy in charge of making sure large numbers of people were murdered on schedule.

She probably believes oligarchical collectivism is morally justified, so long as you call it communist instead of Nazism.

Stupidity? Nuclear Grade!

Gender? We Don’t Need no Stinkin’ Gender!

Read this and weep

Facebook introduced dozens of options for users to identify their gender today – and although the social media giant said it would not be releasing a comprehensive list, ABC News has found at least 58 so far.

Previously, users had to identify themselves as male or female. They were also given the option of not answering or keeping their gender private.

User’s can now select a “custom” gender option.

“There’s going to be a lot of people for whom this is going to mean nothing, but for the few it does impact, it means the world,” Facebook software engineer Brielle Harrison told the Associated Press. Harrison, who worked on the project, is in the process of gender transition, from male to female.

But of course, another identity-obsessed activist helping to erase gender. Now yo can just make up a gender. Heck we can even start brainwashing and indoctrinating very young children. Sure it might scar them, or even ruin their life, but that matters not because,  Progressivism!

The National Science Foundation is spending over $130,000 on a study that asks four-year-olds about their “internal sense of gender identity.”

A grant for a two-year study was awarded to the University of Washington this summer. The project will interview 250 children aged four to six, and their parents, asking a series of questions about “gendered behavior.”

“Prominent theories of gender development have discussed the degree to which gender identity results from an internal sense of gender and socialization processes,” according to the grant. “However, tests of these theories have been limited because, for most children, internal gender identity and environmental socialization substantially overlap, rendering it impossible to distinguish the relative impact of each factor on gender development.”

If you get angry reading this, good! You ought to. Can we just not let four-year-olds be four? No, of course not, because IDENTITY! Identity is now everything, and those “identities” are often very rare, or just created out of a twisted and consuming need to normalize every act or behavior and desire. Look, I do not care what adults do, they can identify as ClownSexuals or Part Time Sexuals, whatever. But the kids, leave them alone to be kids. Of course activists can never allow that can they? Normal gender must die! And abusing innocents babies is a small price for IDENTITY JUSTICE!

Kristina Olson and Selin Gülgöz, two researchers at the university, are leading the study. Both are involved with the school’s “TransYouth Project,” a longitudinal study of gender development and mental health of transgender children.

The TransYouth Project was featured in the Katie Couric documentary for National Geographic,Gender Revolution.

“Our current research study is recruiting children aged 3–12 who are transgender, gender nonconforming, and siblings of gender nonconforming children,” the website for the project states

Dear Lord help us. Propaganda anyone?

Why is it I doubt the veracity of this story? Maybe because the Left does not value truth, and is certainly not above using children to further their agenda? Dave Blount sees the end of this road

They could have saved $130,000. I can tell you the results of the study right now. Gender is a repressive patriarchal social construct that must be destroyed by encouraging little boys to pretend they are girls.

It would be no more wasteful — and far less damaging — if they piled up our money in huge mounds and burned it up in bonfires.

Far less damaging? Yes, consider what an expert, not an activist, has to say

Finally, someone is more concerned with the welfare of children and society in general than they are afraid of being called out as thought criminals by depraved liberal elitists:

Michelle Cretella, MD, president of the American College of Pediatricians, told LifeSiteNews that National Geographic is “promoting a political agenda over science and the wellbeing of innocent children” by featuring a young transgender child.

“‘Affirming’ so called transgender children means sterilizing them as young as 11years old,” said Dr. Cretella. “Puberty blockers plus cross-sex hormones causes permanent sterility. And biological girls who ‘transition’ to male by taking testosterone may have a double mastectomy at age 16. The life time use of cross-sex hormones also puts these children at risk for stroke, heart disease, diabetes, cancers and more.” …

Cretella believes it is both unethical and harmful for parents to make such decisions regarding their children’s gender because they will most likely grow out of their gender dysphoria. “When a child under the age of 12 thinks they are the opposite sex and is allowed to naturally pass through puberty, 75%-95% of the time that child will accept his or her biological sex by the late teen years.” …

Cretella argues that public support of “transgenderism” in children is tantamount to “child abuse.” “When academic, medical and other public institutions propagate the lifetime use of toxic hormones and the surgical removal of healthy body parts as healthcare for children they are engaged in institutionalized child abuse,” she said.

Again, leave children alone! They are not guinea pigs for social activism or gender justice, or any other false label the Left will put on this abuse!

Rep. to introduce bill banning “hate speech” on college campuses

Stalin would approve I am sure

U.S. Rep. Anthony Brown announced during a speech Thursday afternoon that he plans to introduce a bill he hopes will curtail hate speech at universities.

If passed, the bill would require universities and colleges to demonstrate they have programs and initiatives in place that clearly define to students “what is acceptable speech and what is not acceptable speech,” Brown (D-Md.) said to a room of roughly 150 people at the Samuel Riggs IV Alumni Center

For institutions that might lack the necessary resources to create these programs, the bill would set aside grant money to “take away any excuse,” Brown said.

So, we would empower the college to restrict speech as they see fit, at taxpayers expense of course. Gee what could go wrong?

Guess who Marxist Jill Stein blames for North Korean aggression and threats

It is our fault, of course!

What a useful idiot!

ESPN should stop soft-selling what Colin Kaepernick did and continues to do

If you listen to ESPN, you might get the distinct impression that former San Francisco quarterback Colin Kaepernick is no more than an activist who is being punished by the NFL owners for raising the issues of race, and police brutality in America. In fact, it seems that most ESPN commentators are convinced that Colin Kaepernick is being blackballed by the entire NFL. Some continue to paint Kaepernick’s continued unemployment, it was Kaepernick, by the way, who opted out of his contract in San Francisco. He is unemployed because he chose to be. He chose to test the free agent market rather than stay with the 49ers. Some players are even saying that owners who do not sign Kaepernick are cowards.

While there is no doubt that some owners are fearful of the media saturation, and negative feedback from fans if they sign Kaepernick, it is unfair to label them cowards. In fact, some owners who are not, and will not sign the QB might have a more simple reason. It just might be that Kaepernick is hated for his actions. Yes actions. No, despite the narrative, Kaepernick did not simply choose not to stand for the national anthem. That was simply the first act in his transition into social justice warrior. In fact, this is how Kaepernick described his decision to snub the flag.

“I am not going to stand up to show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses black people and people of color,” Kaepernick told NFL Media in an exclusive interview after the game. “To me, this is bigger than football and it would be selfish on my part to look the other way. There are bodies in the street and people getting paid leave and getting away with murder.” All because he kneeled during the national anthem last year. 

It is one thing to kneel during the anthem to raise awareness or begin a conversation, as Kaepernick’s defenders claim he was doing. It is quite another to smear law enforcement in such an irresponsible and egregious fashion. But, it seems Kaepernick is all about the narrative.

The problem with this narrative, of course is that it is not true. America is the most tolerant and racially diverse nation on earth. Obviously Kaepernick has been over indulging in the social justice Kool-Aid. His statement goes along with the Black Lives Matter mantra that police are “hunting down” young Black men. Again, such a claim is completely false and reckless.  But BLM is a group deeply rooted in Marxist philosophy. You should really go read their mission statements. If you are anti-family, anti police, anti-individualism, you will love these nuggets of delusion.

Kaepernick it should be noted began to embrace the social justice warrior act after he began dating Nessa Diab, a devoted Leftist who is a full-blown SJW

NFL quarterback Colin Kaepernick’s conversion to social activism coincided with his romancing of a hip hop DJ of Egyptian descent who has frequently spoken about perceived racial injustices and “Islamaphobia” in the U.S.

Kaepernick reportedly began dating Hot 97 DJ and MTV host Nessa Diab in July 2015. A few months later, his social media posts began to reflect the Black Lives Matter and Muslim activism of Diab.

“History!” Kaepernick wrote on Instagram Oct. 15, when he marked 50 years since the Black Panther Party was founded.

But 31 of his last 42 posts have strong social justice connotations, often featuring quotes from radical Nation of Islam leader Malcolm X, Black Panthers founder Huey Newton and cop killer Assata Shakur. During a Sunday news conference about the flag flap, Kaepernick dressed in a black hat with a large, white “X” and a T-shirt that featured photos of Cuban despot Fidel Castro and Malcolm X.

You can peruse Kaepernick’s Instagram here . You can see the transition for yourself. Of course, what ESPN will not tell you are the other things Kaepernick has done to alienate himself, well except for Will Cain, who actually looks at all the offensive stands Kaepernick has taken

Cain is correct here. Kaepernick did not kneel and then explain his positions in a calm rational way. He instead stayed in the hole he was digging and went right back to shovelling and in the process exposed himself as just another ignorant sjw trying to play a victim by bashing the country that gives him liberty. Liberty he clearly does not grasp, or appreciate. Instead he donned a Castro T-shirt and started to rant about government oppression? Talk about the irony of ironic ironies

The August evening the nation first noticed Colin Kaepernick taking a knee during the playing of the national anthem at an NFL game, the San Francisco 49ers quarterback held a postgame news conference, as is typical league policy. At that news conference Kaepernick wore a T-shirt emblazoned with photos from a 1960 meeting between Malcolm X and Fidel Castro.

So after his first notable protest against what last week he called the “systematic oppression” of minorities in the United States, and saying he wants “freedom for all people,” Colin Kaepernick put on a T-shirt that featured a supportive image of one of the 20th century’s most enduring oppressors.

This absurd contradiction between what Kaepernick said and does was only a distant annoyance to me because, although I was born into Cuba’s imprisonment, I don’t often write about Kaepernick or his team. This wasn’t my fight.

Yes,, the writer actually KNOWS about the brutality and evil of Communism. He, unlike Kaepernick KNOWS about oppression

Some facts:

Cuba for more than five decades under the Castros has stifled practically any and all dissent. According to Human Rights Watch, “Cuban citizens have been systematically deprived of their fundamental rights to free expression, privacy, association, assembly, movement, and due process of law. Tactics for enforcing political conformity have included police warnings, surveillance, short-term detentions, house arrests, travel restrictions, criminal prosecutions, and politically motivated dismissals from employment.”

Now go to Google images of the Ladies In White protesting on Cuba’s streets. Kaepernick, the poster child for protest among NFL players, should do this. He would see images of women — white, black, mothers, daughters, sisters — systematically violated in one form or another by Castro’s thugs.

They are harassed, spat upon, pushed and even bloodied simply because they are fighting to do in Cuba what Kaepernick does on an NFL sideline without fear or physical repercussion — just before he wears that Castro shirt to his postgame presser.

And yet, Kaepernick wore a shirt honoring Castro? What type of social justice is that? What is Kaepernick advocating exactly? Does he even know? Or is playing the victim to addictive for him to embrace facts?  Armando Salguero pressed Kaepernick in a teleconference

So I ask Kaepernick how he can protest oppression then ignorantly don a T-shirt featuring an oppressor?

After first denying he wore a Castro T-shirt at all, Kaepernick finally told us all why he loves him some Castro

And that’s exactly the moment Kaepernick shows how lost he truly is. Because in the next breath, Kaepernick, born in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, explains to me, the guy born in Havana, how great Castro really is.

“One thing Fidel Castro did do is they have the highest literacy rate because they invest more in their education system than they do in their prison system, which we do not do here even though we’re fully capable of doing that,” Kaepernick said.

Is this real life?

First, Cuba does not have the highest literacy rate. Second, don’t be surprised if the same people who report Cuba’s admittedly high literacy rate are related to those who report its election results — the ones in which the Castros get 100 percent of the votes.

Third, could it be Cuba doesn’t have to invest a lot in its prison system because, you know, dungeons and firing squads (ElParedon) are not too expensive to maintain?

You can go read the whole piece here Kaepernick exposed himself as another dimwitted useful idiot who swallows the brainwashing the Left excels in. America bad! Castro good! America bad! America racist! And so on. Gee why would an NFL owner not want this sparkling gem of ignorance on their team? Hmmm

Then there are the other vile things poor victimized Colin has done. Things like wearing sock depicting police as pigs. Kaepernick, who is woke, explained himself, and spat on law enforcement once again

Kaepernick released a statement Thursday on his Instagram account explaining why he wore the socks:

“I wore these socks, in the past, because the rogue cops that are allowed to hold positions in police departments, not only put the community in danger, but also put the cops that have the right intentions in danger by creating an environment of tension and mistrust. I have two uncles and friends who are police officers and work to protect and serve ALL people. So before these socks, which were worn before I took my public stance, are used to distract from the real issues, I wanted to address this immediately.”

Sounds like one of those “some of my best friends are…” defenses to me. Again, kaepernick threw all police under his Social Justice Warrior Victim Bus. But, he did not stop there did he?  Nope!

And NFL owners might not want this loudmouth on their team? How racist of them! How dare they not want this agitator in their locker room? I would bet most coaches, and players also would rather punch Kaepernick in the mouth than have him on their team. Of course if they were to do such a thing, or even express such sentiment, the media would go after them. Yes, the same media that has basically white washed Kaepernick’s verbal idiocies.

Sorry, but Kaepernick has made his own bed, and continues to wallow in it frankly. He has the talent to play, no doubt. He was a fun player to watch. I used to enjoy his on the field deeds, and, if I owned an NFL team, I would have signed him had he stopped his ignorant diatribes after the anthem protest. But now? Hell would freeze over numerous times before I would sign a player that spews such ignorant and despicable things. Kaepernick is not the victim of hate, he is a purveyor of hate! Maybe the Castros will take him in. Maybe they can put him in charge of their “social justice” for dissidents program. Heck, maybe Kaepernick can even explain to the Cubans in prison for daring to question their government what a real victim he is?

Ah yes, the stench of Leftist tolerance

The masters of intellectual cowardice and bigotry

A Chicago art professor has resigned, saying a “small cadre of militant LBGT students with an authoritarian agenda” created a “toxic environment” for him.

Michael Bonesteel—a renowned expert on comic books and outsider art who taught popular classes at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago (SAIC) for the past 14 years—explained in an exclusive interview with The Chicago Reader that he resigned after students repeatedly filed complaints accusing him of racism and homophobia because he failed to provide “trigger warnings” before introducing controversial subject matter.

Trigger warnings, yet another crock of BS cooked up by the Left

Citing a “toxic environment” that “feels more like a police state,” Bonesteel alleged that student complaints to administrators resulted in him being told he wasn’t allowed to teach future classes on comic books, causing his teaching-load to be reduced to a level that would have rendered him ineligible for health insurance benefits.

The first complaint, Bonesteel said, arose during a discussion of Henry Darger, a Chicago artist known for depicting representations of young girls with penises in his comic books, whose work Bonesteel has studied extensively.

Bonesteel recounted presenting a theory—which he claims is considered plausible by many scholars—that the shocking images might be related to possible childhood sexual abuse.

According to Bonesteel, a transgender student objected to the discussion, arguing that “there was no proof that Darger was sexually abused, and therefore I was wrong in proposing the theory.”

When Bonesteel defended the theory, he claims that the transgender student filed a complaint with the administration, resulting in Bonesteel needing to meet with a diversity counselor and post an apology on the school’s website.

Oh no, he offended the super duper protected class of trannies. Yes, I know I am supposed to sat “Transgender” but you know what too bad! I also realize I just “triggered” some trannies. Again, too bad! 

This fiasco of trigger warnings and safe spaces is a tragedy that is destroying the university frankly. The only way to stop it is to stop coddling these whiners and miscreant totalitarian bastards!

And, once more if that triggers you then too fucking bad!

Your Ironic Irony of the Day

Via Campus Reform

A Marxist student group at Swarthmore College disbanded itself earlier this year after realizing that its members were too rich and too white to be real commies.

According to screenshots confidentially provided to Campus Reform by an individual with access to the group’s private Facebook page, the demise of the Swarthmore Anti-Capitalist Collective (SACC) came in the wake of a farewell letter from a member who had decided the group could never be an effective proponent of “unproblematized anticapitalist politics” due to its “history of abuse, racism, and even classism.”

Unproblematized anticapitalist politics? What the hell does that even mean? Just think how much good these Marxists could do if they stopped making up words to define their foolish beliefs and started reading about our founders.

FINALLY! Liberal tries to sell us on being PC, fails miserably

The Gay Patriot examines a piece by a naive Millennial who tries to lecture people on the virtues of political correctness self-censorship. Then proceeds to take Mr. Inclusive to the intellectual woodshed

In an article dripping with condescension, a precious Millennial Snowflake writing for Inc. Magazine is given the space to lecture the bigoted “older generation” on why Millennials — being smarter, more worldly, and more woke than their dottering elders — embrace political correctness.

The purpose of political correctness is to treat all people with the love and respect they deserve. This means calling people by the pronouns they use, and avoiding words and phrases that stereotype and demonize entire groups of people. You can still possess whatever ideology you follow and you can still share your opinion, you’re just being asked to do so in a way that is not hurtful to others.

Go read the whole thing, it is a priceless example of a thinker taking apart the blatherings of an emoter. Here is a sample

Millennial Snowflake: “We’re not censoring your speech, we’re just politely requesting that you use sensitive language.”

Me: “So, I’m still allowed to express any opinion I want as long as I use the PC words.”

MS: “Exactly, now you’re getting it, old man.”

Me: “Can I say that I think mass immigation from underdeveloped countries is bad for our economy and social cohesion.”

MS: “Oh, no. That’s problematic because it’s insensitive and demonizes immigrants.”

 

Yet another reason to hate Statism

Oh New York and their central planning numbskulls, and the idiot New Yorkers who keep voting for them

Wherever there is a need, the free market steps in to fill it — except in New York, where senselessly micromanaging authoritarians won’t even allow pet-sitting:

Health Department rules ban anyone from taking money to care for an animal outside a licensed kennel — and the department has warned a popular pet-sitting app that its users are breaking the law. …

[Chad] Bacon, a former zookeeper and wildlife researcher, signed up for the app to help make ends meet while he was between jobs, but did enough business that he now makes his living from it full-time.

Congrats, bureaucrats. You’ve thrown him out of work. With luck, maybe you can get him on the welfare roll.

The health code bans boarding, feeding and grooming animals for a fee without a kennel license — and says those licenses can’t be issued for private homes. … Fines start at $1,000.

All a sane person can do is shake their heads at such foolishness. What business is it of the government to decide who can, or cannot watch your pet, keep your pet, or feed your pet?

Then there is Canada, Oh Canada!

A City of Toronto work crew was seen in Etobicoke’s Tom Riley Park early Friday morning, removing a staircase that had been erected by maverick local handyman Adi Astl. Construction on new stairs, Mayor John Tory promises, will begin immediately.

Astl, a retired mechanic, says he built the stairs for a mere $550 after several neighbours tumbled down a muddy slope leading to the park’s garden. The work, which only took a few hours, came after the community was told to wait for a $65,000 to $150,000 solution from the city.

“The new stairs will be safe, durable and reasonably priced,” Tory wrote.

The City estimates that the new stairs will cost $10,000. In an interview with CTV News Channel from Toronto City Hall, Tory vowed to make sure that cost estimates are more reasonable in the future.

Well, $10,000 is better than $65-150,000 but still, $10,000??? 

 

On this edition of “How in the Hell did they get elected?”

Via Moonbattery!

One problem with placing a courthouse too close to a homeless shelter is that jurors have to wade through human excrement to get in the door. One problem with electing moonbats is that they will object to hosing the excrement away, because that would be racist:

Councilmember Larry Gossett said he didn’t like the idea of power-washing the sidewalks because it brought back images of the use of hoses against civil-rights activists.

Good Freaking Grief! This has to be parody right? Oh, wait, I forgot that it is no longer possible to parody the Left!

 

Paste eating Joan Walsh redefines stupidity once again

This woman would lose an IQ contest to a tree stump, and lose badly H/T The Washinton Times

Ms. Trump, an unpaid adviser to her father, caused backlash this weekend after she took a seat on his behalf during a working session Saturday morning in Hamburg. Mr. Trump said he had asked his daughter to hold the seat while he attended meetings, calling the practice “very standard.”

Ms. Walsh, however, took issue with Ms. Trump wearing a “girlie” dress during the controversial moment, which was a pale pink with large bows on the sleeves.

“I don’t mean to sound sexist, it can be dangerous to comment on what women wear, but the fact that she sat in for her father in a dress that was so incredibly ornamental was such a contradiction in terms,” Ms. Walsh told MSNBC host Thomas Roberts on Sunday, in remarks first flagged by Newsbusters.

“And I think that what we see is that in patriarchal, authoritarian societies, daughters have great value — they are property,” she said. “And the message that she is sending about her own value, about her place in the White House, and about the place of women in this administration, I think, are really, pretty frightening.”

You simply cannot parody these moonbats any more. They revel in their idiocy, wearing it like a badge of honor.

Is it true that violence never solves anything?

Well, to anyone who can think, the answer is easy. Of course it can. If someone is trying to rape a woman (a violent act) and she shoots him (a violent act) then that solve sthe problem of that rapist, mainly that he is breathing. Both cats are indeed violent are they not? But all violence is not equal. His act of violence was an act of evil. Her act of violence was noble and good. It not only stopped her from being raped, but likely other women he may have targeted in the future.

I could go on and on, and on with examples of how some violence is indeed, necessary, and noble. But really, would it do any good for those who cling to the foolish saying that violence is violence, and never solves anything. I cannot grasp how anyone could believe such a demonstrably idiotic idea.

The Left, of course largely rejects such common sense, at least in part because they are so obsessed with equality. To them, anyone who judges one culture, or religion, or behavior over another is abominable. The same rule applies to violence. To say one act of violence is good while another is evil is unfathomable to them.