Noted Marxist Senator introduces bill to end Electoral College

Another day, another hissy fit thrown by a Democrat this time by Barbara Boxer of Marxifornia

Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) will introduce legislation on Tuesday to get rid of the Electoral College, after Hillary Clinton lost the presidential election despite leading in the popular vote.

“In my lifetime, I have seen two elections where the winner of the general election did not win the popular vote,” Boxer said in a statement. “In 2012, Donald Trump tweeted, ‘The electoral college is a disaster for a democracy. I couldn’t agree more. One person, one vote!”

She added that Clinton, whom she supported, is “on track to have received more votes than any other presidential candidate in history except Barack Obama.”

Well Trump has said many things, and reversed himself over the years. That is why he was my 38th choice out of the 17 GOP candidates. Let us pray he holds to his campaign promises. But, back to Boxer for a moment. This woman has no clue. What would she do if her bill passes and next election, the GOP candidate wins the popular vote but would have lost the election if the Electoral College was in place? We must grasp that our Founders put that system in place for a reason. Boxer, being a devoted Leftist, cares nothing for anything our Founders put in place. Here is more on the importance of the Electoral College


The Six Things Donald Trump MUST Do As President

Hillary Clinton represents everything that is wrong with the American political class. She epitomizes establishment corruption and wanton criminality, and to ignore her blatantly felonious behavior is to condone it.

Of all the ruinous policies enacted by the previous administration, none is so egregious and universally despised as The Affordable Care Act. It must be eradicated like the cancer that it is and replaced with a free-market-based alternative as soon as humanly possible.

This is the primary reason why Donald Trump was elected president, make no mistake about it, and while its construction will not, in and of itself, put an end to illegal immigration, it will symbolize a seriousness of intent with respect to border security that has been sorely lacking in our government for decades.

When it comes to our nation’s highest courts, there are essentially two types of judges who oversee them, originalists and activists. Activistic judges believe that our Constitution is a “living, breathing” document that they are free to modify from the bench at any time and for any reason they concoct. As for originalist judges, I think Justice Antonin Scalia put it best when he said: “Our manner of interpreting the Constitution is to begin with the text, and to give that text the meaning that it bore when it was adopted by the people.”

Reinvigorating the U.S. economy cannot occur without radically reducing taxes on the companies which make up its foundation. Business taxes amount to taxes on all Americans – be they CEOs, employees, stockholders or consumers – and trillions of dollars have been lost to our economy over the years due to government’s insistence on inflicting punitive taxation upon our nation’s most productive citizens. Adding insult to injury, pro-globalist trade policies like NAFTA have served to accelerate the decline of America’s economic vitality, and any attempts to reverse the trends of the past few decades without addressing these key points will prove futile.

Cutting government spending begins with downsizing the bureaucracies infesting it. This can be done through attrition, which simply means not hiring new federal employees to replace the ones who retire for an extended period of time. Beyond that, there are scores of agencies which should be eliminated entirely, like the departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Labor, Housing & Urban Development, and the EPA for starters. Furthermore, federal regulations have become so pervasive that reducing their number by 50 percent would still leave the Federal Register with nearly 100,000 pages of growth-killing rules. Yes, certain regulatory powers must be exercised in order to stop bad people from doing harm to the rest of us, but when nanny-state know-it-alls in Washington DC decide to start telling the rest of us how much water we can use to flush our toilets or what sort of bulbs we can screw into our light fixtures, they’ve engaged in the sort of conduct that our founding fathers would have taken up arms to oppose.

By Edward L. Daley



I guess it is easy to have a clear conscience if you have no conscience

What else do we expect from a political hack like Donna Brazile

Donna Brazile says she has no regrets about her interactions with Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign while working as a CNN contributor.

CNN last week cut ties with Brazile, who is currently the interim chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee (DNC), amid reports she tipped off Clinton’s team about debate question

“My conscience, as an activist, as a strategist, my conscience is very clear,” she told host Joe Madison on his Sirius XM broadcast Monday. “When I said what I said, I said it, and I’m not going back on it.”

It is easy for her, the truth means nothing to the Left

Why yes, the Clinton campaign is sleazy

Leaked emails released by WikiLeaks show how depraved Team Clinton is

Via Fox News

The Hillary Clinton campaign came under fire from Erica Garner on Thursday, the daughter of Eric Garner who was killed by a police officer in New York City, after the latest batch of emails released by WikiLeaks revealed how the Democratic presidential nominee talked about her father’s death.

In a series of tweets, Garner expressed anger at the information that poured out from the email release.

“I’m troubled by the revelation that you and this campaign actually discussed ‘using’ Eric Garner … Why would you want to ‘use my dad?” she said. “These people will co opt anything to push their agenda. Police violence is not the same as gun violence.

Garner also tweeted out links to hacked emails from Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta that show staffers trying to figure out how to word an editorial on gun violence that would later run in the New York Daily News.

The emails reveal how Team Corruption was trying to use Eric Garner’s death to push for gun control. They prove how little his actual death means to hacks like Podesta and the rest of Hillary’s cabal. The only thing that matters is whether or not these deplorables can use his death to push their agenda

*VIDEO* Stefan Molyneux And Charles Ortel: Exposing Massive Fraud And Corruption At Clinton Foundation



Yes, Trump’s comments from 2005 ARE locker room talk

I am not now, nor have I ever been a defender or fan of Donald Trump. To be honest, I am ashamed that the GOP is such joke of a party that we are stuck with the ultimate nose holder of a nominee in a year where the Democrats have nominated a candidate that is as dishonest, corrupt, and, yes deplorable as I could ever imagine. But this piece is not about Trump, or why he is, if nothing else better, yes, far better than the bottom of the barrel offering the Democrats have nominated.

Nor is this piece about why Glenn Beck should shut up and possibly seek professional help. Nor is it about how foolish silly idiotic those attacking Ted Cruz for “selling out” are. Nor is it about the respect I have lost for certain “Conservatives” like Sean Hannity, and Ann Coulter who advocated so vehemently for Trump. OK, I actually lost respect for Coulter before she latched onto Trump because she is a self-promoting hack but that is beside the point. No, it is not about how cowardly many Republicans are being by renouncing endorsements for Trump either. Gutlessness is an ugly thing, and appeasing the Left never works.

No, this column is directed at those who are overreacting to Trump’s comments about liking women, and how some women allow powerful men to act like slobs, and yes, about grabbing women’s promised lands. And this is directed at those, like ESPN host Molly Querim, who is both devastatingly beautiful and dead wrong for saying Trump’s comment “defended” sexual assault. His comments in no way defended sexual assault. Words do have meanings Molly, and sorry, but Trump did not boast about sexually assaulting women.

Most of all though, this comment is directed at those who are insisting that Trump’s characterization of his comments as “locker room talk” is ridiculous. I am, as many men are,an expert on locker room talk. I have been in locker rooms in high school, various gyms, and jobs, and yes, you will hear lots of talk similar to Trump’s talk on that tape. Generally, I have not engaged in that  type of talk. I am more reserved, and to be honest, tend to find humor in the way some men lie about, or embellish their tales of “conquests”. Yes, I have even heard some things that angered me to a degree that I wanted to slap the taste out of someone’s mouth. Once I even called a coworker out when he began talking in a demeaning fashion about a very pretty, and sweet girl we worked with. Generally though, most of the talk is just wishful thinking or remarks about the shapely backside of that girl who was doing curls in the free weight area. 

Yes, I know, it is apparently stunning to some that men notice women’s backsides, faces, breasts, and legs. Apparently, it is also shocking to them that men have sexual thoughts and urges, and sometimes express those in locker rooms. Yes, “locker room talk” happens. And some of that talk might offend. Some of it might be demeaning, and yes, a lot of it is wishful thinking. The media has been fixated on this scandalous scandal, instead of Hillary’s emails, Benghazi, The Clinton Foundation, and Hillary’s treatment of her husbands female accusers. Of course, the media had this tape during the primaries, but chose not to release them. The media wanted Trump, and for two reasons. First, they want Hillary to be elected, and they view Trump as easier to beat. Second, Trump does equal better ratings, and yes, Virginia, the media, yes you too Fox, are driven by ratings.

Here is you take away from all of this

Yes, locker room talk happens.

Those denying it are lying.

Many of the outrageously outraged are Liberal hacks who have said or defended much worse sexual comments about Conservative women like Michelle Malkin, Katie Pavlich, Dana Loesch, Stacey Dash and others. Many of the offended have said terrible things about gun owners, Southerners, Tea Party folks, etc without batting an eye. So, their integrity is about as deep as Hillary Clinton’s. This is what the Left always does though, they lie about those that differ in their ideology, then scream like spoiled brats when someone says something “offensive” to them. Again, as Dennis Prager says, the truth is not valued by the Left.

So, spare us the fake outrage, spare us the GOP cowardice, let’s talk about issues, let’s compare Trump, a vulgar jerk to Clinton, a crooked, corrupt Leftist who puts her own interests far above the country. Yes, at the end of the day, Trump is a better choice, or at least Hillary is the worst possible choice. Only a full blown moron would vote for Hillary, and folks, NEVER go full blown moron!

*VIDEO* Wild Bill Vs Hillary Clinton