Remember that Liberal Inclusion does not include you!

The impossibility of parodying the Left grows each day it seems. Even in our wildest dreams, we simply cannot be as KRAZY as they are!

The educratic pontiffs of political correctness have spoken. Inclusiveness now requires excluding Santa Claus:

Officials in a taxpayer-funded suburban Portland school district have banned Santa Claus — and, it seems, any trace of the celebration of Christmas — because “images and artifacts” “like Santa Claus” create insufficiently “inclusive and welcoming spaces.”

The Hillsboro, Oregon school district is the home of the ban on Santa and Christmas, reports Portland NBC affiliate KGW.

Hillsboro school district human resources director Kona Lew-Williams sent a memo to school employees alleging that one or more people “have shared concerns about not feeling welcome at the Administration Center due to the images and artifacts present in our spaces.”

One or more people “have shared concern”? Wanna bet it is one? One loud mouth bully who the school should have told to get the heck over themselves. But, of course you are still free not free to be part of the inclusion

“You may still decorate your door or office if you like, but we ask that you be respectful and sensitive to the diverse perspectives and beliefs of our community and refrain from using religious-themed decorations or images like Santa Claus,” the human resources director pontificates.

And what of being sensitive to those who celebrate Christmas? Should,’ inclusion be, dare I say inclusive? There is good news though. It seems the weasels have retreated once exposed

“We were NOT banning Santa, nor were we going to be the ‘decorations police’ and scold people if they happened to have decorations up that might be too Christmas-y,” Graser said, “unless they were totally over the top.”

See how easily these bullies are thwarted. 

 

So now police protecting people is, wait for it, RAAAAACIST!!

That rumbling sound you hear is George Washington rolling in the ground Dave Blount sums it up

This is what happens when children reach physical if not mental adulthood without ever receiving needed spankings or even hearing the word “no”:

I would argue that this is also a glaring sign of how detached from reality and critical thinking these students are

Protesting students at George Washington University say forcing them to be protected by campus police is akin to an “act of violence” — because police officers support Donald Trump.

So, all police voted from Trump? And because an officer supported Trump they are likely to hurt people? This is what happens when you teach kids that hating people who vote or think differently than they do is acceptable.

The students have demanded campus leaders direct money to several diversity programs to rectify the situation, one of several demands lodged with administrators recently as left-leaning students at the private, Washington D.C.-based university reel from Trump’s election.

Ah yes, these little Stalinist starter kits have “demands”. Let’s have a peek at said demands

“The university must re-channel its resources and money to its fundamental requirement: to protect its students,” the demand letter reads. “This safety must not depend on the University’s police. The Fraternal Order of Police, the largest police union in the United States, has formally endorsed President-Elect Donald Trump. The FOP includes over 10,000 members in Washington D.C., many of which have jurisdiction over GW’s campus. Placing us in these officers’ care is an act of violence, especially for Black students.”

I wonder what would happen if one of these miscreants little snots were to call police and the police said “hey, tough luck. We do not want to victimize you.” Wanna bet the students would be irate that the police did not do their job? Of course, 99% of these officers would respond and help the endangered student no matter of their politics. In other words, the police would be what these students are not. TOLERANT! And speaking of being intolerant bigots, which is what these students are, look at some of their other demands.

The school must always assert itself on the side of students of color

Is this not racist? To assume guilt for students who are “not of color”. Would this not mean no legal resource or any ability for a redress of grievances for White students?

GWU cannot harbor “structural Islamophobia”or interfere with Muslim students’ attire.

In other words Muslims would get special privileges to scream Islamophobia at the drop of a hat, a hat they would most likely be dropping

GWU must “increase the acceptance of Palestinian international students to prevent their genocide at the hands of Israel”

Sure, because Israel, which actually practices honoring freedom of religion and actual tolerance, and which treats women as equals is evil to the Left

Sexual assault claims must always be believed

Oops, there goes innocent until proven guilty, another American value trashed by the Left.

Leftism is an Ideology for the intolerant

And by intolerant, I mean they wish to grind to dust anything they deem offensive, you know, really bad stuff, like hoop skirts

Previous Rule 5 subject Blake Lively Surrenders To Gawker, Agrees To Delete Her Lifestyle And Fashion Site

In an interview with Vogue published today, actress and model Blake Lively revealed that she will be deleting her lifestyle site Preserve on October 9. The site has been decried again andagain for celebrating antebellum fashion and decor, and it seems like the criticism has pushed her to shuttering the site just a year after its launch.

Lively’s announcement has already spurred an article with this gleefulheadline from Gawker (emphasis added): “Blake Lively Finally Deletes Her Antebellum-Obsessed Lifestyle Site Preserve.” Gawker‘s triumphant tone on the news of Preserve‘s demise follows a year-long string of stories skewering Lively for — gasp — praising Southern culture.

Man, you can’t have that. You might start thinking southern folk are human or something, and you might have to grant them the right to think, speak, and maybe even vote. Who knows where that might lead?

Last fall, Lively’s site featured a fall fashion photo spread called “Allure of Antebellum.” Naturally, there was a social media firestorm, saying that the site glorified slavery and oppression.

Alongside photos of a woman dressed in clothes available for purchase on the site ran the following text:

“The term Southern Belle came to fruition during the Antebellum period (prior to the Civil War), acknowledging women with an inherent social distinction who set the standards for style and appearance. These women epitomized Southern hospitality with a cultivation of beauty and grace, but even more with a captivating and magnetic sensibility… While at times depicted as coy, these belles of the ball, in actuality could command attention with the ease of a hummingbird relishing a pastoral bloom.”

Keep in mind folks, nothing Lively is doing praises, or condones slavery, all her site is about is fashion, and lifestyle, not politics, not any endorsement of anything evil, or wrong. Yet this woman has been ravaged by the radical vermin of the Left. I wish I could say something to Blake Lively to stop her deleting this site. As Fritz explains, we MUST not surrender one inch to these Totalitarians

The reason that SJWs keep pushing such ridiculous shit is because it works. Each incremental attack on American culture as it exists is a win for them. We must resist at all costs.

Amen!

And the latest thing to be banned? The Kiss Cam

Syracuse University, which years ago caved to PC by changing the name of its sports teams from Orangemen, to The Orange so as not to offend Feminuts, has now gone even nuttier

Nothing escapes the judgment of our politically correct overlords — not even kiss cams:

Syracuse University has put the kiss cam in the deepfreeze.

A long tradition at sporting events across the country, the kiss cam projects the image of two people sitting next to each other in the stands on the stadium scoreboard—often inside a heart—and holds the shot until they kiss.

Earlier this month, a man who attended a Syracuse football game wrote a letter to the editor of a local newspaper, saying the kiss cam encourages male entitlement and sexual assault. Since then: no kiss cam at the Carrier Dome.

Oh Good Freaking grief, is there no end to the asininity of the Left? Oh, I know, silly question. These freaks will not stop until every move we make is pre-approved by some panel of Leftists somewhere

WTF is wrong with you Vols?

Every Tennessee Volunteer should hang their head in shame

Now the University of Tennessee has gone full moonbat:

The University of Tennessee has told its staff and students to stop calling each other ‘he’, ‘she’, ‘him’ and ‘her’ – and to start referring to one another with terms like ‘xe’, ‘zir’ and ‘xyr’ instead.

The Knoxville branch of the public university, which has 27,400 students, sent a memo round to its members filled with unusual new parts of speech to avoid referring to anybody’s gender.

According to a gay rights official at the university, the new language regime will make the university ‘welcoming and inclusive’ and stop people feeling ‘marginalized’.

Oh for fucks sake! BTW here is the WOMAN, I think that is a woman, that wrote these guidelines. So please blame HER, because SHE did it. SHE is to blame, it is all HER doing! SHE is the buffoon responsible

What a full grown Marxist Moron looks like
What a full grown Marxist Moron looks like

This is what type of hypersensitive, self-absorbed world she would make for us all. This is what she thinks makes a better world

Donna Braquet, who runs the university’s [Pervert] Pride Center, wrote the guidelines, which are accompanied with a long table demonstrating how to replace the regular parts of speech.

She also advises staff members not to call roll in class, and to instead greet every student by asking them to announce their name and pronoun of preference.

Pronoun of preference? Honestly who thinks up this garbage?

The Left is, and always has been the greatest advocates for censorship

Via 357 Magnum

Ever feel like you are living in a universe slightly out of plumb? We are, almost, living in the world of Fahrenheit 451 as envisioned by Ray Bradbury. Burns the Books!.

Fire-Captain Beatty, in my novel Fahrenheit 451, described how the books were burned first by the minorities, each ripping a page or a paragraph from the book, then that, until the day came when the books were empty and the minds shut and the library closed forever.

No one can be made to be uncomfortable. Campus “feminists” of today need a “safe space” – like the old Victorian Ladies’ Lounge complete with fainting couches – if anyone even wants to talk about a subject they find uncomfortable. Somewhere Susan B Anthony is weeping.

ISIS smashes history they don’t like in the Mideast. People are clamoring to do the same thing in this country. (Confederate Monuments anyone?) Just because you don’t like something, doesn’t mean you can’t learn something from it. History is not comfortable. The human race isn’t always about peace and happiness. But ignorance of history, is not a good thing.

We have, as a society elevated feelings above all else. We have become a society that celebrates and even rewards whining. In doing so, we have also become a society that punishes those who tell the truth because the truth can hurt.  We must not allow Nativity scenes, or monuments to the Ten Commandments because it might make a radical Atheist feel excluded. We must not allow anything that offends, or that might offend a Liberal, offending Conservatives is not only still OK, it is celebrated now. Apparently some people’s feelings are more equal than others I guess.

I guess jokes by Conservatives are not “cutting edge” enough for snotty ET!

So the phony outrage of the day is that Clint Eastwood dared tell a joke, and a funny one, about Bruce, ah Caitlyn Jenner

Clint Eastwood might just want to stay off stage for… well, ever.

After staying out of the spotlight since that time he talked to an empty chair like a crazy person at the 2012 Republican National Convention, the four-time Oscar-winning actor/director stirred controversy yet again on Saturday.

This time, the 85-year-old “American Sniper” director ruffled feathers when he made a joke at the expense of Caitlyn Jenner while appearing onstage at Spike TV’s 2015 Guys’ Choice awards.

According to USA Today, the joke — which Spike TV has said they will cut when the awards show airs — was made when Eastwood was introducing “San Andreas” star Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson.

According to reports, Eastwood introduced Johnson by comparing him to other famous athletes, such as “Jim Brown and Caitlyn Somebody…”

What is the issue here? Jenner is front page news right now, and was once the greatest athlete in the world, so why is it out of bounds for Eastwood or anyone to make such a joke? Especially while at the “Guys Choice Awards”. PC is about the last thing you would expect to hear at that awards show. But, it seems Spike cannot surrender to the hyper sensitive Lefties fast enough.

Spike TV Senior Vice President of Communications David Schwartz told USA Today that the network will remove Eastwood’s comment in the version of the show that will air on June 18.

I would bet that Jenner would have laughed at the joke, as would most normal folks. Of course, Leftism is an ideology for the abnormal, so………..