The folly of Egalitarianism

The Left and their obsession with equality, or at least what the define is equality are hard for me, or any other sane person to grasp. I mean, how can we not shake our heads at this foolishness

Amid growing calls for greater gender inclusivity on campus, Yale College administrators are moving to replace the term “freshman” with the gender-neutral term “first-year.”

How sad. An institute of higher learning does not have more serious matters to deal with? Who are they going to help with this action? No one. And, no, I do not think that appeasing any person who is offended by the word freshman will be of any help to anyone. Coddling bullies and miscreants gains society or in this case a university anything worthwhile. You only encourage more malcontents to feel more entitled.

Dean of Student Affairs Camille Lizarríbar, who is leading the conversation about the potential change, told the News that while administrators are committed to the shift, there is no fixed timeline or specific plan for its implementation. However, Lizarríbar said she hopes that the language change will be implemented “before the next academic year.”

I wonder how a person so interested in protecting students from the English language by censoring certain words ever rose to any position of authority. It is a sad day when a country founded on individualism, and liberty begins to reward inane ideas as worthy of praise in any way.

“I think there comes a time when you want to make sure that the way you’re calling things reflects the values that you have,” Lizarríbar said. “If we really are serious about inclusivity and diversity, we need to look at everything. It’s not written in stone that it has to be ‘freshman.’ … We do have some agency in what we call things.”

Values? Yes, I would agree this is all about values. And clearly the values of Lizarribar do not reflect the values of reasoned, well-adjusted people. Again, we are seeing a person push to censor the English language to protect their “values”. So, I suppose we can now add the English language to the growing list the Left is trying to erase. Individualism, thought, freedom of speech, gender, national borders, private property, freedoms of religion and association, the right of self-defense, the rule of law, and respect for law enforcement and on and on the list goes.

Of course some will scoff and say “this is a trifling matter, why raise an alarm about it?” Why? Well, because values matter. Because one day this nation will be unrecognizable if the Left is left unchallenged. The fact is our language, culture, borders, liberties and founding principles do matter. And when they cease to matter, well, then it is too late.

Awww, poor snowflakes have the sads when their own intolerance bites them

They cannot stand the taste of their own bigotry

Three students at the University of Puget Sound are appealing their suspension for creating a public shame list called “Bigots of Puget Sound.”

The list, which was discovered in November, accused 22 students and faculty members of being racist, misogynistic, sexist, or transphobic, reports KING 5.

They claim innocence, but their real issue is they never ever expected to be held to their own standards of political correctness

UPS released a statement on Nov. 11 denouncing the list as “deeply disturbing and offensive” and promised to investigate the incident.

“As a community, we place a high value on freedom of speech,” the statement affirmed. “That freedom requires balance and does not extend to speech that violates our harassment policy, our integrity principle, and other policies that affirm the values of our community.”

Ah, the very same “balanced” freedom that these little Stalinists helped create is not so great when they are held to the same standards they insist on.

A university investigation found surveillance footage of Akilah Blakey, Andres Chavez, and Lydia Gebrehiwot that allegedly shows them with the bigot list, resulting in all three students being suspended from campus until 2019 for harassment and disrespectful behavior.

The students still will not admit to creating the list, although they have defended it as a legitimate form of activism and are planning to appeal their punishment.

Ah, but “activism” they cry! Activism, to the Left gives them license to commit character assassination, and to paint anyone who does not bow to them as racist, misogynistic, sexist, or transphobic. The Left, you see has standards, and those standards are only to be applied to, well, any group the Left wishes to persecute. Of course, the Left will never use a term like persecution for their tactics. It is “social justice” or “activism”.

“I think the list itself it’s absolutely a form of activism,” Blakey said. “If the institution isn’t doing what they’re supposed to be doing to protect all of its students, well, something is going to happen if there is no other avenues to express all of the hate that’s going on campus. What do they expect?”

Yes, of course, the snowflakes are the victims here, because “hate”. And, again, don’t you dare say what these three miscreants did was hate, remember it was activism

According to Blakey, the list wasn’t about the individuals named, but rather about the campus climate as a whole, which makes students of color feel marginalized.

See, it was not about the 22 people they labeled as horrible people. Not at all, it was simply a way for the snowflakes to throw a tantrum because they are maladjusted, hateful, and intolerant, ah I mean “activists”.

Frankly, I hope these three will take some time to think, and take a long look in a mirror. Perhaps, just perhaps they can actually grow into people who can use critical thinking rather than blind emotionalism and hatred for anyone different than them. In short, I hope these three can actually realize they are the bigots they accuse “others” of being. Then perhaps, they can do a bit of “activism” in their own lives

Stallions are now sexists?

Good Freaking Grief How long until no sports team can have any mascot, or name? 

Via Breitbart:

A school district in Kentucky has canceled the school’s “Stallions” mascot after a petition from the community argued that the mascot was “inappropriate and sexist.”

The petition, which garnered just over 200 signatures, was successful in its efforts to have the Fayette County school district changed the new Frederick Douglass High School’s mascot from the “Stallions” to something more appropriate for female sports teams.

This is inappropriate and sexist when you consider the definition from “Your Dictionary” …”The definition of a stallion is a male horse that has not been castrated, used for breeding or is slang for a powerful and virile man who has a lot of lovers” and from Wikipedia…”because of their instincts as herd animals, they may be prone to aggressive behavior

Why does anyone take such idiocy seriously? We are allowing miscreants to sap every bit of fun from our culture

Of course the students will be allowed to pick a new mascot, like, maybe a gender-neutral horse. Yes, really, because gender is bad or something

Superintendent Manny Caulk announced on Tuesday that the high school would get rid of the stallion mascot in favor of a more gender-neutral horse mascot, which he believes will be more appropriate as a symbol for the several female sports teams that Frederick Douglass High School will field.

Selective Outrage Syndrome anyone?

Oh that Prince Charles, and his ears just beg to be mocked. Recently the Prince developed outrage over what he calls “anti-immigrant” sentiments

LONDON — The heir to Britain’s throne spoke out Thursday, saying the wave of anti-immigrant populism sweeping the world has “deeply disturbing echoes” of the Nazis’ persecution of Jews in the 1930s.

Prince Charles, the queen’s eldest son, said his parents’ generation “fought and died in a battle against intolerance, monstrous extremism and an inhuman attempt to exterminate the Jewish population of Europe.

“That nearly 70 years later we should still be seeing such evil persecution is to me beyond all belief,” he added. “We owe it to those who suffered and died so horribly not to repeat the horrors of the past.”

Wait, what? Did he actually say we are seeing the same type of evil persecutions the Nazis committed? So, there are concentration camps in Europe? People are being gassed? Of course not, but Chuckles is a Leftist, and he must therefore go way overboard with the emotionalistic rhetoric because #Caring

Surely raw, unworthy hatred for immigrants is a terrible thing. But much of what is going on across the Atlantic, and here, is that people are increasingly tired of immigration laws being rendered meaningless.They are also tired of any hint of national pride being demonized as extreme, or Nazi-like. The fact is much of the issue is with immigration without assimilation. Immigrants who do not care to even try becoming an American, German, Italian etc. is unhealthy for the nation they move to. Immigration without assimilation is a death sentence for the nation accepting such immigrants. Yet, prince Charles fails to see this basic truth. He shows no outrage for immigrants who refuse to integrate themselves into their new home.

He also shows no outrage at the many acts of terror, rapes, sexual assaults, and intimidation many Muslim “refugees” are committing against the Swedes, Germans, French, etc. Where is his outrage at the way far too many European women are being treated by these Muslim refugees? Where is his outrage at what Muslim refugees think about Islamizing Germany?

A translator at refugee camps in Germany has claimed Muslim migrants hate Christians and want to Islamize the country.

The woman, 39, from Eritrea, came to Germany as a refugee herself in 1991, before volunteering at asylum centers to “give something back.”

But the Arabic speaker said what she discovered when working with migrants over the last five years shocked her.

During her time at a number of centers across the country, she said she discovered Muslim refugees preaching “pure hatred” of Christians.

Muslim children were told by their parents not to play with Christian kids.

And she herself was told it was a sin for her to help feed and defend Christians.

She told German Catholic website Kath.net: “They want Germany to be Islamized. They despise our country and our values.”

I suppose this is not worthy of the selective outrage of Prince Charles. He is willingly blind to behavior that is far worse than being “anti-immigrant”

The Toronto Star titled their account of the story:  “Ontario facing ‘epidemic of Islamophobia’ survey finds”. The article did not discuss possible reasons for the attitude of Ontarians, which just may be based on real occurrences with real victims. Some examples: i) Sweden has now become the rape capital of the world; ii) a thousand women were sexually assaulted in Germany as the migrant rape crisis worsens; iii) the 70,000 crimes committed or attempted by migrants in Germany, iv) the declaration by the Islamic State that they have infiltrated the refugees and will continue to do so.

There were also the stories the media covered up, about Muslim “refugees” threatening a Minnesota community with rape, and the incident involving the sexual harassment of teen girls by refugee men at a high school in New Brunswick.

Not all Muslim migrants are criminals. Among them are decent human beings who have gone through hellish experiences, and they need help. But Western media and authorities are also providing cover for jihadists and Muslim migrant criminals, at the expense of innocents who elected them in trust.

It is reprehensible that the entirely warranted caution and fears about Muslim migrant violence that are expressed by hardworking, taxpaying citizens of Canada (and in other Western nations) are brushed aside and deemed “islamophobic”. Authorities are failing their citizenry.

Indeed the hearts of decent people break for most of the refugees. But allowing massive numbers of unvetted people into your nation is no solution. And when a significant number of those people do not share your national culture and values, it is a very destructive thing. It is a vital role of governments to decide who enters their nation, and who can stay and become a citizen. Indeed one of America’s great blessings has been immigrants. But those immigrants must WANT to come here to learn our language, laws, and embrace our culture. E Pluribus Unum means out of many, one. Many different ethnicities, races, religions, etc have come here and have assimilated. That is healthy and wonderful. But, there is danger in simply saying OK, everyone come in

President-Elect Donald Trump is right: Abdul Razak Ali Artan, the Somali refugee who went on a Palestinian-inspired jihad-rampage with a car and a knife, wounding 11 people at Ohio State University last Monday, “should not have been in our country.”

Artan is but one of an unknown number of Muslim refugees who have been allowed into the country through a deliberately flawed screening system that was established by the Obama administration.

Earlier this year, Amman’s refugee resettlement center coordinator at the American Embassy in Jordan, Gina Kassem, admitted that at least 600 refugees had been interviewed each day, hastily, since the center opened in 2015.  Moreover, to achieve the goal set by Obama to increase the flow of refugees to the U.S., the center has not been excluding anyone or “look[ing] for families with certain education background, language skills or other socio-economic factors [or] cut family sizes.”  It is safe to assume that similar actions have been taken by U.S. refugee resettlement coordinators elsewhere.

Where is your outrage Prince Charles? Or are Western lives expendable in your quest for “equality”?

Even if the interviews took longer, how could any U.S. agency involved with the screening of refugees requesting to resettle here check the background of Artan and his family, who reportedly claimed to be a Somalis, who had spent seven years in Pakistan?  Why were the teenage Artan, his mother, and his siblings allowed into the U.S.?  Islamic terrorist activities make both Somalia and Pakistan high-risk countries, and all applicants for immigration to the U.S. should have gone through most rigorous screening.

While White House press secretary Josh Earnest kept reassuring reporters: “This vetting of refugee applicants involves collecting biometric info, doing in-person interviews, doing background checks, running their info through a variety of national security and international databases,” it became clear that it is enough to be “a Muslim refugee” to fit into Obama’s plan to resettle the U.S. with Muslims.

And, truth be told, it seems that Christian refugees are not as likely to be admitted, why?

But the numbers tell a different story: The United States has accepted 10,801 Syrian refugees, of whom 56 are Christian. Not 56 percent; 56 total, out of 10,801. That is to say, one-half of 1 percent.

Somewhere between a half million and a million Syrian Christians have fled Syria, and the United States has accepted 56. Why?

“This is de facto discrimination and a gross injustice,” Nina Shea, director of the Hudson Institute’s Center for Religious Freedom, told Fox News. Fox notes another theory: The United States takes refugee referrals from the U.N. refugee camps in Jordan, and there are no Christians there.

Again, one of the most essential duties of government IS to protect its citizens, and to control immigration. It is not an easy job, especially when so many in governments across the West seem incapable of common sense. Again, Prince Charles, where is your outrage for Maria Ladenburger?

The brutal rape and murder of a 19-year-old German woman, Maria Ladenburger, apparently by Afghan migrant who claims to be 17 years old, seems to have been the last nail in the coffin of Merkel’s open-door migrant policy, which she had promised to not to let go even after extreme opposition from within her own party’s leadership.

Ladenburger had been a medical student volunteering at a migrant housing facility. Her murderer had reportedly seen her in the shelter. The incident set off shockwaves not only in the Germany but also across Europe, especially after promises by Germany’s interior ministry to deport as many Afghan citizens as possible after failing to confirm any credible claims for asylum.

In the meanwhile, authorities in Berlin last weekend announced the arrest of an Afghan citizen who was actively involved in terrorist attacks in Afghanistan, while living part-time in Germany.

German police a few weeks back also launched an operation against a Salafist group in the country, whose members were brainwashing Muslim youths, mostly in Germany, to get jihadist training and join the Islamic State’s battle against the world in Syria and Iraq.

The Salafist organization had registered itself as a social work entity under the cover of distributing the Quran in markets and public places, and claiming to be bridging the gap between the West and Islam.

One suspect was arrested in Aschaffenburg and another was detained in Mannheim, on the allegation of plotting an Islamically motivated attack on a public place.

This recent shift in strategy is also a lesson that the West has learnt a bit too late, despite having experienced similar assaults not that long ago by the Nazis, Mussolini, Lenin, Stalin as well as terror organizations such as Baader Meinhof, al-Shebaab, ETA, the Red Brigades, Hamas, Al Qaeda, Palestinian Islamic Jihad and Hezbollah, to name just a few.

Since the unprecedented terror attacks in France, Belgium and Germany, citizens across the Europe have been living in constant fear. They seem to be sick and tired of the Muslim extremists; children might be in danger on their way to school, and shopping takes place under the protection of soldiers.

Outrage you say Prince Charles? Or is it Selective Outrage?

Remember that Liberal Inclusion does not include you!

The impossibility of parodying the Left grows each day it seems. Even in our wildest dreams, we simply cannot be as KRAZY as they are!

The educratic pontiffs of political correctness have spoken. Inclusiveness now requires excluding Santa Claus:

Officials in a taxpayer-funded suburban Portland school district have banned Santa Claus — and, it seems, any trace of the celebration of Christmas — because “images and artifacts” “like Santa Claus” create insufficiently “inclusive and welcoming spaces.”

The Hillsboro, Oregon school district is the home of the ban on Santa and Christmas, reports Portland NBC affiliate KGW.

Hillsboro school district human resources director Kona Lew-Williams sent a memo to school employees alleging that one or more people “have shared concerns about not feeling welcome at the Administration Center due to the images and artifacts present in our spaces.”

One or more people “have shared concern”? Wanna bet it is one? One loud mouth bully who the school should have told to get the heck over themselves. But, of course you are still free not free to be part of the inclusion

“You may still decorate your door or office if you like, but we ask that you be respectful and sensitive to the diverse perspectives and beliefs of our community and refrain from using religious-themed decorations or images like Santa Claus,” the human resources director pontificates.

And what of being sensitive to those who celebrate Christmas? Should,’ inclusion be, dare I say inclusive? There is good news though. It seems the weasels have retreated once exposed

“We were NOT banning Santa, nor were we going to be the ‘decorations police’ and scold people if they happened to have decorations up that might be too Christmas-y,” Graser said, “unless they were totally over the top.”

See how easily these bullies are thwarted. 

 

So now police protecting people is, wait for it, RAAAAACIST!!

That rumbling sound you hear is George Washington rolling in the ground Dave Blount sums it up

This is what happens when children reach physical if not mental adulthood without ever receiving needed spankings or even hearing the word “no”:

I would argue that this is also a glaring sign of how detached from reality and critical thinking these students are

Protesting students at George Washington University say forcing them to be protected by campus police is akin to an “act of violence” — because police officers support Donald Trump.

So, all police voted from Trump? And because an officer supported Trump they are likely to hurt people? This is what happens when you teach kids that hating people who vote or think differently than they do is acceptable.

The students have demanded campus leaders direct money to several diversity programs to rectify the situation, one of several demands lodged with administrators recently as left-leaning students at the private, Washington D.C.-based university reel from Trump’s election.

Ah yes, these little Stalinist starter kits have “demands”. Let’s have a peek at said demands

“The university must re-channel its resources and money to its fundamental requirement: to protect its students,” the demand letter reads. “This safety must not depend on the University’s police. The Fraternal Order of Police, the largest police union in the United States, has formally endorsed President-Elect Donald Trump. The FOP includes over 10,000 members in Washington D.C., many of which have jurisdiction over GW’s campus. Placing us in these officers’ care is an act of violence, especially for Black students.”

I wonder what would happen if one of these miscreants little snots were to call police and the police said “hey, tough luck. We do not want to victimize you.” Wanna bet the students would be irate that the police did not do their job? Of course, 99% of these officers would respond and help the endangered student no matter of their politics. In other words, the police would be what these students are not. TOLERANT! And speaking of being intolerant bigots, which is what these students are, look at some of their other demands.

The school must always assert itself on the side of students of color

Is this not racist? To assume guilt for students who are “not of color”. Would this not mean no legal resource or any ability for a redress of grievances for White students?

GWU cannot harbor “structural Islamophobia”or interfere with Muslim students’ attire.

In other words Muslims would get special privileges to scream Islamophobia at the drop of a hat, a hat they would most likely be dropping

GWU must “increase the acceptance of Palestinian international students to prevent their genocide at the hands of Israel”

Sure, because Israel, which actually practices honoring freedom of religion and actual tolerance, and which treats women as equals is evil to the Left

Sexual assault claims must always be believed

Oops, there goes innocent until proven guilty, another American value trashed by the Left.

Leftism is an Ideology for the intolerant

And by intolerant, I mean they wish to grind to dust anything they deem offensive, you know, really bad stuff, like hoop skirts

Previous Rule 5 subject Blake Lively Surrenders To Gawker, Agrees To Delete Her Lifestyle And Fashion Site

In an interview with Vogue published today, actress and model Blake Lively revealed that she will be deleting her lifestyle site Preserve on October 9. The site has been decried again andagain for celebrating antebellum fashion and decor, and it seems like the criticism has pushed her to shuttering the site just a year after its launch.

Lively’s announcement has already spurred an article with this gleefulheadline from Gawker (emphasis added): “Blake Lively Finally Deletes Her Antebellum-Obsessed Lifestyle Site Preserve.” Gawker‘s triumphant tone on the news of Preserve‘s demise follows a year-long string of stories skewering Lively for — gasp — praising Southern culture.

Man, you can’t have that. You might start thinking southern folk are human or something, and you might have to grant them the right to think, speak, and maybe even vote. Who knows where that might lead?

Last fall, Lively’s site featured a fall fashion photo spread called “Allure of Antebellum.” Naturally, there was a social media firestorm, saying that the site glorified slavery and oppression.

Alongside photos of a woman dressed in clothes available for purchase on the site ran the following text:

“The term Southern Belle came to fruition during the Antebellum period (prior to the Civil War), acknowledging women with an inherent social distinction who set the standards for style and appearance. These women epitomized Southern hospitality with a cultivation of beauty and grace, but even more with a captivating and magnetic sensibility… While at times depicted as coy, these belles of the ball, in actuality could command attention with the ease of a hummingbird relishing a pastoral bloom.”

Keep in mind folks, nothing Lively is doing praises, or condones slavery, all her site is about is fashion, and lifestyle, not politics, not any endorsement of anything evil, or wrong. Yet this woman has been ravaged by the radical vermin of the Left. I wish I could say something to Blake Lively to stop her deleting this site. As Fritz explains, we MUST not surrender one inch to these Totalitarians

The reason that SJWs keep pushing such ridiculous shit is because it works. Each incremental attack on American culture as it exists is a win for them. We must resist at all costs.

Amen!

And the latest thing to be banned? The Kiss Cam

Syracuse University, which years ago caved to PC by changing the name of its sports teams from Orangemen, to The Orange so as not to offend Feminuts, has now gone even nuttier

Nothing escapes the judgment of our politically correct overlords — not even kiss cams:

Syracuse University has put the kiss cam in the deepfreeze.

A long tradition at sporting events across the country, the kiss cam projects the image of two people sitting next to each other in the stands on the stadium scoreboard—often inside a heart—and holds the shot until they kiss.

Earlier this month, a man who attended a Syracuse football game wrote a letter to the editor of a local newspaper, saying the kiss cam encourages male entitlement and sexual assault. Since then: no kiss cam at the Carrier Dome.

Oh Good Freaking grief, is there no end to the asininity of the Left? Oh, I know, silly question. These freaks will not stop until every move we make is pre-approved by some panel of Leftists somewhere

WTF is wrong with you Vols?

Every Tennessee Volunteer should hang their head in shame

Now the University of Tennessee has gone full moonbat:

The University of Tennessee has told its staff and students to stop calling each other ‘he’, ‘she’, ‘him’ and ‘her’ – and to start referring to one another with terms like ‘xe’, ‘zir’ and ‘xyr’ instead.

The Knoxville branch of the public university, which has 27,400 students, sent a memo round to its members filled with unusual new parts of speech to avoid referring to anybody’s gender.

According to a gay rights official at the university, the new language regime will make the university ‘welcoming and inclusive’ and stop people feeling ‘marginalized’.

Oh for fucks sake! BTW here is the WOMAN, I think that is a woman, that wrote these guidelines. So please blame HER, because SHE did it. SHE is to blame, it is all HER doing! SHE is the buffoon responsible

What a full grown Marxist Moron looks like
What a full grown Marxist Moron looks like

This is what type of hypersensitive, self-absorbed world she would make for us all. This is what she thinks makes a better world

Donna Braquet, who runs the university’s [Pervert] Pride Center, wrote the guidelines, which are accompanied with a long table demonstrating how to replace the regular parts of speech.

She also advises staff members not to call roll in class, and to instead greet every student by asking them to announce their name and pronoun of preference.

Pronoun of preference? Honestly who thinks up this garbage?

The Left is, and always has been the greatest advocates for censorship

Via 357 Magnum

Ever feel like you are living in a universe slightly out of plumb? We are, almost, living in the world of Fahrenheit 451 as envisioned by Ray Bradbury. Burns the Books!.

Fire-Captain Beatty, in my novel Fahrenheit 451, described how the books were burned first by the minorities, each ripping a page or a paragraph from the book, then that, until the day came when the books were empty and the minds shut and the library closed forever.

No one can be made to be uncomfortable. Campus “feminists” of today need a “safe space” – like the old Victorian Ladies’ Lounge complete with fainting couches – if anyone even wants to talk about a subject they find uncomfortable. Somewhere Susan B Anthony is weeping.

ISIS smashes history they don’t like in the Mideast. People are clamoring to do the same thing in this country. (Confederate Monuments anyone?) Just because you don’t like something, doesn’t mean you can’t learn something from it. History is not comfortable. The human race isn’t always about peace and happiness. But ignorance of history, is not a good thing.

We have, as a society elevated feelings above all else. We have become a society that celebrates and even rewards whining. In doing so, we have also become a society that punishes those who tell the truth because the truth can hurt.  We must not allow Nativity scenes, or monuments to the Ten Commandments because it might make a radical Atheist feel excluded. We must not allow anything that offends, or that might offend a Liberal, offending Conservatives is not only still OK, it is celebrated now. Apparently some people’s feelings are more equal than others I guess.

I guess jokes by Conservatives are not “cutting edge” enough for snotty ET!

So the phony outrage of the day is that Clint Eastwood dared tell a joke, and a funny one, about Bruce, ah Caitlyn Jenner

Clint Eastwood might just want to stay off stage for… well, ever.

After staying out of the spotlight since that time he talked to an empty chair like a crazy person at the 2012 Republican National Convention, the four-time Oscar-winning actor/director stirred controversy yet again on Saturday.

This time, the 85-year-old “American Sniper” director ruffled feathers when he made a joke at the expense of Caitlyn Jenner while appearing onstage at Spike TV’s 2015 Guys’ Choice awards.

According to USA Today, the joke — which Spike TV has said they will cut when the awards show airs — was made when Eastwood was introducing “San Andreas” star Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson.

According to reports, Eastwood introduced Johnson by comparing him to other famous athletes, such as “Jim Brown and Caitlyn Somebody…”

What is the issue here? Jenner is front page news right now, and was once the greatest athlete in the world, so why is it out of bounds for Eastwood or anyone to make such a joke? Especially while at the “Guys Choice Awards”. PC is about the last thing you would expect to hear at that awards show. But, it seems Spike cannot surrender to the hyper sensitive Lefties fast enough.

Spike TV Senior Vice President of Communications David Schwartz told USA Today that the network will remove Eastwood’s comment in the version of the show that will air on June 18.

I would bet that Jenner would have laughed at the joke, as would most normal folks. Of course, Leftism is an ideology for the abnormal, so………..

The latest most RAAAAACIST thing ever? The city of Buffalo

Grievance mongering goes nuclear grade

A Native American group is calling on “Buffalo, New York” to change its racist, insensitive name.

Pundit Press reported:

Mark Beasley, a member of the Navajo Nation, has started a petition for Buffalo, NY to change its “racist and offensive” name. According to Beasley, he speaks for his “Native American colleagues.”

Beasley writes in his petition that “Buffalo is the name of the animal that was driven almost to extinction by the non-Native forces in order to annihilate and drive out my ancestors from the American landscape.”

Further, “Within only a few years from the beginning of the campaign, all Native nations were driven off their lands and into reservations, where we have prior and since been unduly subjugated and and [sic] exposed to genocidal horrors unimaginable to the rest of the world and throughout history.”

For these reasons, Beasley writes, Buffalo “should change their offensive and racist names containing the word “Buffalo.””

This is what America gets for rewarding so many whiners and malcontents.

Sweden tackles its rape crisis by renaming RAAAAACIST birds!

Sweden is now the rape capitol of the West, and they are, apparently more concerned with more “tolerant” bird names.

Via NRO:

Sweden’s Ornithological Society has changed the names of a bunch of birds because they were concerned that the old names sounded racist.

For example: Any bird whose name contained the word “neger” (negro) had that word changed to the word “svart” (black), according to an article in The Local.

“We kept getting more and more questions from translators of Swedish TV programs and books wanting to know what exactly different bird names were or meant, so we decided to compile a list and while we were doing that we decided to change the names of any birds that could have stirred up a debate,” said Anders Wirdheim, information officer at Sweden’s Ornothological Society.

The bird previously known as “Zigenarfågel” which means “gypsy bird” will now be called “hoatzin,” even though that English word is already used to describe a type of tropical pheasant found in swamps and forests.

Good grief, Nuclear Grade Stupidity

My Super Sunday predictions

Well, here w are, the culmination of another football season. Super Sunday, Seahawks and Patriots, a Katy Perry halftime show, fireworks, way too much pregame show, and yes, the commercials. So what do I think will happen? Hmmmm

The Pats will win because of better coaching, and because Tom Brady knows it might be his last shot at ring #4. And they will win because they will be agitated by all the morons pretending that they are “cheats”. Back in 2006, the NFL, made a decision to allow each team to brings its own footballs to each game. The NFL had to know that the quarterbacks, who all are very particular about the feel, weight, and inflation level of the football would use this rule, and stretch this rule, and bend this rule. The NFL had to know. So, I think it safe to say that most, if not every NFL team likely plays fast and loose with that rule, and thus the amount of air in the balls. That does not shock me. What doers shock me is that anyone is “shocked” that this might be the case. I mean really now. In a game where all teams will do anything to win a championship, why is anyone surprised that rules are bent? Who are the idiots that needed those dots connected for them?

Frankly, I am pulling for the Pats ONLY because of Deflategate, which is a non-story driven by the drama queens in the sports media. Frankly, most of the sports journalism today sounds more like high school girls gossiping to me than actual journalists breaking stories. (But, enough about ESPN’s First Take with Screamin A Smith and failed shock jock Skip Bayless. The show at least has Cari Champion who has a body to lust after, so I guess it is not a complete loss.) Then there are the press conferences, where sports “reporters” ask stupid questions that no actual sports fans care about then pat themselves on the back for asking “tough” questions, EGADS! In fact, I find football so much better when I ignore the useless press conferences with the scripted question and scripted answers. Frankly, I would prefer watching my neighbors Chevy rust than take in any sports press conference.

So, I am not taking in the press conferences, or the incessant pre-game babbling from former players saying the same things repeatedly. And I will skip the halftime show most likely. Katy Perry is quite attractive yes,  but her music is not in my wheelhouse and to be honest I will be watching the Super Bowl to watch, wait for it, FOOTBALL! I do not need a halftime show, or a three-day long pregame show. I love football, and this game should be very good.

Of course there are the commercials which used to be great. I say used to be because in recent years the ads all seem tame and boring because all the corporations are afraid of offending some whiner or another. Seriously, where have the funny spots gone? I guess PC killed them, Hell it has about killed all free expression so why not commercials too right?

And to top it all off NBC is broadcasting the game, which means we might get a lecture in Liberalism from noted anti-self-defense midget Bob Costas at some point. OH boy!

So, enjoy the game, and Katy Perry’s body, which is nice even if most of her music sucks, and heck you might even see a decent commercial, which will draw outrageous outrage from some whiny group somewhere. 

Students suspended for a picture taken in their home?

Zero Tolerance? Or Naked Statism?

That bi-polar, Queen of Hearts, full-speed-ahead blind fury and absolutism is the mark of the modern educator, and this institutionalized insanity is running rampant in Massachusetts, where a pair of awkward teenagers have been suspended for daring to be talked about by their peers for a Facebook photo.

Two high school students in Massachusetts were suspended and face possible expulsion after posting a homecoming photo online of themselves holding airsoft rifles.

Tito Velez, 15, and his girlfriend Jamie Pereira posed with the airsoft rifles inside his home before heading to the Bristol Plymouth Regional Technical School homecoming dance in Taunton, a local NBC affiliate reported.

“This isn’t dangerous. … You can’t kill someone with it,” Tito said. “We didn’t shoot anyone. We were pointing them at the floor. Everything was on safe, no batteries, they never left the house. We never took them to school. That’d be stupid.”

Airsoft rifles only shoot plastic pellets and are not intended to be lethal. Still, the two were suspended Monday morning after posting the photo on Facebook, and administrators are considering expulsion, the station said.

“They created a disruption, in our opinion, and that’s what they’re being punished for,” said superintendent Richard Gross.

The issue wasn’t the gun replicas themselves, but the “Homecoming 2014″ caption attached to the photo, the superintendent said.

Where does this crap stop? When does it stop? When parents enough parents say NO MORE! It stops when people start getting fired for this blatant abuse of power, and of children. This must stop. It has now become a case of a school punishing kids for what they do at home. And understand this is more of the War on Guns This is about intimidation, and re-education, and it MUST STOP! We are allowing our liberties to be taken by fanatics and bullies. And it makes me ill that more parents are not standing up and demanding an end to such abuse. I promise you, if enough parents showed up at the school, lawyers in tow, and demanded this be fixed, it would be fixed damn quick!

The Stupidity of the Left knows no bounds

Good Freaking Grief! We seem to have given abject stupidity and ineptitude places of honor. Mike McDaniel is as fed up as I am with zero tolerance

I’d really like to think this kind of zero-tolerance lunacy is confined to the eastern United States. To be sure, it may reasonably be expected there, but I’m afraid it’s a contagion rivaling Ebola in virulence. Unlike with Ebola, however, I’m equally sure Mr. Obama will not be sending 3000 troops to Connecticut to “fight” this particular disease. NBCconnecticut.com has the story: 

Tuesday, Sep 16, 2014 • Updated at 4:19 PM EDT

JFK Middle School in Southington was on lockdown Tuesday after a student in a military-style jacket prompted concerns from staff members, who called police to report a suspicious person at the school.

The middle school, located at 1071 South Main Street, was placed on lockdown around 11 a.m. Tuesday.

Police said a school employee spotted a suspicious man in the hallway and described him as standing 5 feet 7 inches tall and wearing a green military-type jacket.

The school sent an alert to parents informing them of the incident as officers canvassed the area and searched the school grounds.

Whoa there buckaroo! A “green military-type jacket”?! They locked down the school because a person wearing a green military-type jacket looked “suspicious?” Read on:

According to police, a student matching the staff member’s description was found in a classroom and identified as the person in question.

The student did not pose a threat and, after completing a secondary search, police gave the all clear. The lockdown was lifted shortly before 1 p.m.

A second alert from Southington schools said police did not find anything that was cause for concern but conducted a thorough search for the buildings and grounds.

Well of course. What a close call! I’m surprised the entire community wasn’t sent to the bomb shelters. Imagine the pandemonium if the student has been wearing camouflage trousers too! That would have been good for the callout of at least one SWAT team and strip searches of every student and teacher.

Again, Good Freaking Grief!

What could possibly go wrong?

A clusterfuck of epic proportions is born

Wake Forest University kicked off the fall 2014 semester by instituting a campus-wide online system that has the potential to restrict free speech by allowing students and staff to anonymously file reports on any occurrences they deem biased or hateful.

Known as the Bias Incident Report system, the online form does not specify the criteria for filing a report, nor does it explicitly define the word “bias.” Instead, students are pressured to submit a report anytime they believe they are encountering an incident of hate or bias — potentially opening the floodgates for students to report incidents without cause.

The report form lists a bevy of reasons an incident could be perceived as biased, some of which include: citizenship, gender identity, national origin, pregnancy, religion, sexual orientation and economic background. The form even offers an option to upload a video, photos or audio of the occurrence.

The guidelines as to what “bias” relies heavily on student emotion — when a student feels at all offended by someone’s differing political or religious ideologies, a file is reported and is required to be officially investigated by university officials

Just another all-out assault on freedom of speech

Frankly, I would have told her to take a flying leap at a rolling can of vienna sausages

A restaurant advertised that they have bacon, a whiny Muslim got her feelings hurt so, the business took down the sign and is “reaching out” to her? Good Grief!

A sign on a lamp post at the bottom of the Winooski Circle displayed the words “Yield Sneakers Bacon” until Friday morning. The bistro owners took it down.

It started with a post from one woman who wrote that the sign was insensitive to those who do not consume pork. She said as a Muslim she is personally offended by it.

The owners of Sneakers spoke to WPTZ. They say they’ve reached out to the individual who made the post and proactively took the sign down. They also say they regret any harm caused by the sign, and that their goal was never to cause stress or bad feelings.

Of course they have now offended MANY more people by kissing the arse of this self-entitled whiner, and they have emboldened her, and other whiners to bully any business that “offends” them. This woman is a bully, and when you cave to bullies, you make them bully even more. And, please tell me what good “reaching out” to this miscreant does anyone? She did not like the sign, so what? What if she now demands the restaurant stop serving bacon? Will they reach out again? What if a vegetarian demands they stop selling beef? After all this business has now declared that they are going to do whatever they can NOT to offend. Let those flood gates open.

Powerful words that show how Leftism is working to silence speech

Donald Douglas has the news, not surprising, that the MTV Music Awards were going to have plenty of Leftist race baiting over Ferguson. After all, what better sums up the intellectual wasteland that IS Leftism more than an awards show with uninformed “artists” Parroting Leftist talking points about a matter they likely have not the first actual clue about? But, the REAL gem in this is the silencing affect of “tolerance”

At the Washington Post, “MTV to turn Video Music Awards spotlight on Ferguson“:

Last year, Miley Cyrus’s twerking, teddy-bear-filled performance at MTV’s Video Music Awards set off fierce arguments about race and cultural appropriation. This year, MTV is hoping to use its awards ceremony to start a different kind of conversation. Before and during the show, the network will be airing somber public service announcements about the ongoing standoff between law enforcement and the citizens of Ferguson, Mo., in the wake of the August 9 shooting death of teenager Michael Brown.

MTV’s spots are part of a larger campaign, Look Different, that the network developed in conjunction with organizations including the Anti-Defamation League, the NAACP, the National Council of La Raza and the Southern Poverty Law Center. MTV has a long history of activist-oriented youth programming, and the Look Different program developed out of a paradox that MTV President Stephen Friedman told me he saw showing up in MTV polling.

“Eighty percent of our audience believes that bias is at the root of racism and prejudice,” Friedman said. “But when cultural explosions like Trayvon Martin, or the recent death on Staten Island, or what is now happening in Ferguson occur, our audience often feels paralyzed to discuss the issues.”

The reason? A good-intentioned schema for how to treat other people fairly that ultimately makes it more difficult to acknowledge unfairness or difference when it shows up anyway.

“Ironically, part of the problem is that this generation was taught to be color-blind,” Friedman told me. “As a result, they feel like they’re going to step on a land mine if they say the wrong thing. In fact, our research has shown that fully 70 percent of our white audience grew up not talking about race in their households. They’re striving for fairness and equality and often just aren’t sure how to to proceed.”

In short, the Left has effectively intimidated any White person from feeling free to speak, unless they say wring thing. So, they are left with either being silent, or just regurgitating talking points they KNOW will be safe. This is EXACTLY what the Left desires

Atheists hear high school football players praying with coaches, outbreak of GODitis ensues

So, very tired of these bullies and their dirt bag lawyers

Hundreds of people gathered in Gainesville, Ga., to defend religious liberty Wednesday after an atheist group demanded a local high school remove religion from its football team.

The American Humanist Association sent a letter to officials at Chestatee High School Tuesday, threatening to sue if the football coaches don’t quit praying with the team, and if all biblical or religious messages are not removed from team documents, Fox News reports.

More than 200 people showed up for a prayer rally on the Chestatee football field Wednesday to protest the letter.

“We have received reports that CHS coaches have joined players in prayer while standing in a circle, hands interlocked,” the letter stated, according to Fox News. The group, writing on behalf of an unidentified resident, also complained about a banner, written by cheerleaders, that reads “Iron Sharpens Iron, Proverbs 21:17,” and that the team workout schedule references a verse in Galatians.

To me, reading the First Amendment makes a clear case here. 

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

OK, let’s see. The coaches, and schools are NOT Congress, they are NOT making ANY LAWS creating a State Church. But they ARE freely exercising their right to practice their religion. So, what is the problem here? Oh yes, that’s right, these Atheists are leftists, and they are OFFENDED! And Leftism IS an ideology for the narcissistic, so therefore everyone else must cave to the narcissistic Leftist bullies or else!