Ed Takes On The Pro-Establishment Wall Street Journal – A Brokered GOP Convention, MY ASS!


Regarding the recent Wall Street Journal article titled Trump, Voters And The GOP Convention:

WSJ – “Donald Trump may pile up more than enough delegates in the primaries to make his GOP presidential nomination this summer a formality. But what if he doesn’t? Mr. Trump, Ted Cruz and their media mouthpieces are claiming it would be political theft to choose the nominee at a contested convention. These timid souls need an education in party rules, political history and muscular democracy.

Ed – “Timid souls”? What’s timid about either of them or their respective supporters? And just what in hell is “muscular democracy” anyway? Is that another way of describing a system in which the opinions of everyone who isn’t a party official, lobbyist or major donor are ignored?

WSJ – “The Republican Party’s rules say a candidate needs the votes of 1,237 of the 2,472 delegates at the July convention in Cleveland to win the nomination. They don’t say all one needs is a plurality, or to have won the most primaries. There is no moral right to the nomination because a candidate wins 40%, or even 49%, of the delegates. He needs a majority, and the 1,237 number is no secret.

Ed – True enough, yet anyone who thinks it’s reasonable to ignore the most popular candidate in this race – simply because he didn’t win the aforementioned number of delegates – and then gladly hand the majority of them to someone who garnered far less delegates (or maybe none at all) is mentally unstable.

WSJ – “Parties set this public requirement because they exist to win elections, and a nominating majority is the best indicator of the rough consensus necessary to unite the party behind the winner. A candidate who can’t put together a majority of delegates is unlikely to unite the party and is probably a loser in November.

Ed – Yet, handing the nomination to someone else, who cobbled together even LESS delegates, is somehow LIKELY to unite the party? Please explain how that works, exactly.

WSJ – “Before the primary system became the norm in the decades after World War II, party nominees were always chosen at the convention. But even in the primary era, a convention fight has been possible.

Ed – Nobody gives a shit.

WSJ – “As recently as 1976, Gerald Ford came into the convention with more delegates than Ronald Reagan, who offered the vice presidency to Senator Richard Schweiker to turn the Pennsylvania delegation his way. The influential Drew Lewis chose to honor his pledge to Ford, kept the Pennsylvania delegation in line, and denied Reagan the nomination.

Ed – Is this supposed to strengthen your argument in favor of a brokered convention? In case you forgot, Ford got his ass kicked in the general election that year. Reagan, on the other hand, won back-to-back landslides starting in the very next presidential election cycle.

WSJ – “Democrats had to go three rounds of balloting in 1952 to produce Illinois Gov. Adlai Stevenson as their nominee. In 1956 Democrats staged a floor flight over which of more than a dozen candidates to nominate for vice president. Estes Kefauver won. And in 1980 there was a short-lived effort at the Democratic convention to change the rules to help Ted Kennedy catch Jimmy Carter, who had lost nearly every late primary to the Massachusetts Senator.

Ed – Somebody just shoot me now.

WSJ – “With this history in mind, each party continues to have rules for how long delegates are pledged to a candidate. Under the GOP rules, about 1,700 delegates out of 2,472 (69%) are bound in the first ballot to vote for the candidate for whom they are pledged – usually by a primary or caucus result. The 31% who are unbound come from states that don’t hold binding presidential preference contests, or from states that allow some of their delegates to remain uncommitted.

Ed – *Yawn*

WSJ – “If the first ballot doesn’t produce a majority, nearly 80% of the delegates then become free to vote for the nominee of their choice on the second ballot. By the third ballot, 89.4% are free to choose. This gradual liberation is designed to prevent a stalemate and let the delegates work their will to coalesce eventually around the best nominee. This isn’t cheating or “stealing the nomination.” It’s how the process is supposed to work.

Ed – That “process” is complete bullshit, and every rational person knows it! Look, if a candidate gets close but doesn’t win the required number of delegates, then the “process” SHOULD work this way: the top candidate still wins the nomination, but the second-place candidate gets to be his running mate. In essence, the winner forfeits his right to choose a VP while still retaining his top-dog status.

Why is this both the fairest and smartest way of choosing nominees? Because NO OTHER CANDIDATE is more representative of the will of Republican voters than the one who garnered the most delegates in the primary race, and to argue otherwise is just plain idiotic! Furthermore, combining the support bases of the two most popular candidates is far and away the best means of beating the Democrats in the general election. It’s common-fucking sense.

WSJ – “Ah, but aren’t the delegates part of the “establishment”? If by establishment you mean stalwart party members in the provinces, then yes. They are often the rank-and-file GOPers who run state and local party operations. But others are activists chosen to become delegates by the various candidates.

Ed – You can refer to them as the “establishment” or the “Mickey Mouse Club”, for all I care, but the fact remains that they’re not representative of the rest of the GOP voter base, and the “process” they’re engaged in is still completely asinine.

WSJ – “It’s true that three delegates from each state are Republican National Committee members. But the rules this year require nearly all of those RNC members to vote in the first ballot for the candidate who won the most at-large votes in a state primary or caucus. So those RNC members, a small minority of delegates, are expressing the will of the voters in the first go-round.

Ed – Which means nothing to anyone who understands basic math.

WSJ – “The premature protests by Messrs Cruz and Trump are entirely self-serving. Both men think they have a good chance to win a plurality of delegates but can’t be sure they’ll get all the way to 1,237. They want to cry havoc in advance so party members will shrink in fear of a GOP breakup if there’s a nominating fight at the convention.

Ed – “Self-serving” or not, what they’re saying with respect to a party” breakup” is not only highly likely, it’s about as close to a certainty as one can get without owning a magic, crystal ball. If neither Trump nor Cruz is chosen as the Republican party’s presidential nominee – assuming they both garner large numbers of delegates yet fail to gain the required 1,237 – not only will all hell break loose on the convention floor, but the party will utterly disintegrate as a result. It’ll be finished as a viable, political institution from that moment forward, and God help any GOP power-broker who can’t spot this eventuality coming a mile away.

WSJ – “These candidates and Republicans generally should toughen up. If Messrs. Trump or Cruz couldn’t sway a majority at the convention, it would be because they couldn’t convince their fellow Republicans that they have the best chance of winning. Every candidate entered the race knowing the rules, and every candidate has an equal opportunity to exploit them. Mr. Trump certainly has used the accelerated primary calendar to his advantage, racking up a delegate lead before he’s been subject to any real scrutiny.

Ed – “Toughen up”? Excuse the hell out of me, but these guys have been toughening up since last summer, running a grueling race, day in and day out, and taking more shit from the leftist media – as well as establishment-fluffing assclowns like you – than any of the party’s limp-wristed, spineless, kneecap-sucking leaders ever will.

Oh, and just in case this little factoid escaped your attention, the current race – like every other – has less to do with the candidates and far more to do with the people who vote for them. Why? Because a politician’s job is to represent WE, THE PEOPLE. So you can take your well-articulated, yet nonetheless scatterbrained, notions of what is or isn’t an equitable nomination “process” and shove them with a red-hot poker!

WSJ – “It’s always possible that a losing Mr. Trump would bolt the GOP and run as a third-party candidate or urge his supporters to boycott in November. But the same might happen in reverse if Mr. Trump becomes the nominee despite what is growing opposition from traditional Republicans. If the businessman can’t rally a majority at the convention, then he can’t unite the GOP enough to beat Hillary Clinton.

Ed – Bullshit! There is no reverse scenario here. Either one of the two leading candidates gets hosed by the party’s leadership, or he doesn’t. If he doesn’t, it’s anyone’s guess how the general election plays out, but if he does, it’s bye-bye Republican party, and don’t let the door smack you in the ass on your way to oblivion.

WSJ – “Many primaries have yet to be held, and the odds are that the voters will give one candidate a clear majority before Cleveland. But if they don’t, the voters themselves will have set the stage for the convention fight. The event could a great education in party democracy, and it certainly would do better in the ratings than the usual four-day infomercial.

Ed – I agree that an education in “party democracy” is certainly possible in this case. The lesson, however, may well prove to be that you, the Republican elite, have spat too many times in the faces of your constituents, and now you’re about to be bludgeoned to death with your own convention gavel.

…figuratively speaking, of course.

.

Ed Responds To An Article Posted On ‘The Rio Norte Line’ Website


.
In a recent article titled ‘Ranking The Candidates – My Take‘, the author (who goes by the handle Utah) writes:

Trump is an authoritarian corporatist. He promises some government cuts out of one side of his mouth and out of the other side, he promises the most classy, phenomenal, tremendous, efficient well-oiled China beating Leviathan ever, not smaller government. Trump has self-identified as a “common sense conservative” which I interpret as he will be abetted by the usual progressive Republicans in the Congress, he will continue to grow government in a “compassionate conservative” process. The GOP Congress will pretend to resist but will knuckle under just as they have to Obama. His progressive tendencies are evident in how he believes government is a means to an end. GOP loses control of Congress under a President Trump.

To begin with, Trump is not a corporatist. His campaign has gained traction, in part, because he refuses to take contributions from corporations or special interest groups who buy and sell politicians in order to get legislation favorable to them passed through Congress. A corporatist is basically a crony capitalist, and while Trump has played that game for many years from the business side of the coin, he has routinely spoken out against it as a politician. He’s explained that there is a sincere difference between a real estate developer finding himself in a situation where he has to legally bribe political candidates – which is an absolute necessity if you ever want to get anything built in a large city – and accepting such bribes as a candidate who has the means to self-fund his campaign.

The fact of the matter is that the vast majority of politicians in this country are corporatists, especially the party leaders, which is why they HATE Trump and his supporters. The Trumpian movement represents a direct threat to the corporatism which has run rampant in America for as long as I can remember. It is this imbedded corporatist philosophy that has lead directly to massive trade imbalances between the U.S. and practically every other major nation of Earth, as well as the continued influx of millions of illegal aliens for the sake of cheap labor.

Trump’s campaign has been built primarily on the promise that he will end these insidious schemes once and for all, so to even suggest that he is somehow the biggest corporatist in the race is simply ridiculous on its face. As for him being authoritarian, please explain to me how any GOP candidate who embraces the 2nd Amendment is in any way more authoritarian than any Democrat has been for the past 50 years? Is Trump more government-friendly than – say – Ted Cruz? Yes, but that doesn’t make him a full-blown statist like Barack, Hillary, Bernie, or virtually any leftist politician one could name.

He also hasn’t promised to create a federal “Leviathan” in order to beat China in trade or accomplish any of his other stated goals. The fact is that he has called for reducing regulation and taxes on businesses in order to draw resources and jobs back into America from around the world. He also believes in cutting waste, fraud and abuse within the existing federal Leviathan. That’s right, dear Utah, the current government in Washington, DC is already so monstrously huge, corrupt and intrusive that people have been rallying in increasing numbers against it since George W. Bush was president, and many of them are supporting The Donald today. In my estimation, the majority of Trump backers (and I’ve talked to hundreds of them since last summer) are disaffected, disenfranchised, disillusioned, working-class people who are sick to death of watching American jobs move to India and Mexico. In fact, I’ve yet to converse with even one Trumpian who thinks the government shouldn’t be cut down to size, or wants to impose more laws and regulations on their fellow citizens.

Utah goes on to state that Mr. Trump self identifies as a “common sense conservative”. Personally, I have watched dozens of Trump speeches over the past several months, not to mention at least 7 debates, and I have never heard him even utter the phrase before. But assuming he has done so in some forum I haven’t seen, I think it’s a stretch to assume he defines those words in the exact same way that most Washington insiders do. Utah also asserts that Trump will likely embrace the “compassionate conservative” process that grows government, yet he doesn’t explain why he believes such a thing. Yes, Donald Trump talks about making deals with politicians, but that doesn’t necessarily mean doing the same sort of idiotic things that people like Mitch McConnell and John Boehner have done over and over again. Trump’s whole shtick is that he makes GOOD deals, not stupid ones. He expresses the importance of WINNING, not giving away the store just so he can get along with his enemies or garner positive write-ups in the mainstream press.

Look, there are a lot of good reasons not to favor Trump in this presidential race, chief among them being that Ted Cruz is still in the hunt, and is a far better candidate than anyone else running. That having been said, it is more than a little nuts to rate The Donald ABOVE Hillary Felon Clinton on a list that ranks the current candidates from most (or pro) government to least (or anti) government. Clinton is basically Obama in a pantsuit, and if Utah honestly thinks that Donald Trump would be even half as destructive to liberty, justice and our economy as the Wicked Witch of Benghazi, I’m afraid he’s lost his grip on reality.

Edward L. Daley

Ed’s List Of The 20 Greatest Documents Ever Written


1.) The Bible – Both Old And New Testaments

2.) The Unanimous Declaration Of The Thirteen United States Of America – aka The Declaration Of Independence

3.) The Constitution Of The United States Of America

— The Following 17 Are Submitted In No Particular Order Of Importance —

Magna Carta Libertatum

The Principia: Mathematical Principles Of Natural Philosophy (Isaac Newton)

The Wealth Of Nations (Adam Smith)

The Republic (Plato)

Relativity: The Special And The General Theory (Albert Einstein)

The Road To Serfdom (Friedrich Hayek)

Common Sense, The Rights Of Man And Other Essential Writings (Thomas Paine)

The Complete Works Of William Shakespeare

The Histories (Herodotus)

The Art Of War (Sun Tzu)

The Iliad/The Odyssey (Homer)

The Divine Comedy (Dante Alighieri)

Thus Spake Zarathustra (Friedrich Nietzsche)

The History Of The Decline And Fall Of The Roman Empire (Edward Gibbon)

Leviathan (Thomas Hobbes)

The Prince (Niccolò Machiavelli)

A Treatise Of Human Nature (David Hume)

.

*VIDEO* While You’re Worried About The Results Of The Iowa Caucuses, Ed Considers Life, The Universe And Everything

.

.

*VIDEO* Ed Does Another Whacky Video Mashup – This Time Of The Democrat Primary Debate

.

.

Ed Declares August 31st Weird Al Yankovic Day!


Today we pay tribute to the KING of song parodies.



God bless you, Alfred Matthew Yankovic. May your days be many, and your troubles few.


.

Ed Rates The Top 10 GOP Primary Candidates On Their Fox News Debate Performances


NO. 1 – BEN CARSON

.
PRE-DEBATE POSITION: Tied For 4th (6.6%)
DEBATE GRADE: A
PROJECTED POST-DEBATE POSITION: 4th

.

NO. 2 – TED CRUZ

.
PRE-DEBATE POSITION: 6th (6.2%)
DEBATE GRADE: A-
PROJECTED POST-DEBATE POSITION: 5th

.

NO. 3 – MIKE HUCKABEE

.
PRE-DEBATE POSITION: Tied For 4th (6.6%)
DEBATE GRADE: B+
PROJECTED POST-DEBATE POSITION: 6th

.

NO. 4 – MARCO RUBIO

.
PRE-DEBATE POSITION: 7th (5.2%)
DEBATE GRADE: B
PROJECTED POST-DEBATE POSITION: 7th

.

NO. 5 – SCOTT WALKER

.
PRE-DEBATE POSITION: 3rd (10.6%)
DEBATE GRADE: C+
PROJECTED POST-DEBATE POSITION: 3rd

.

NO. 6 – JOHN KASICH

.
PRE-DEBATE POSITION: 10th (2.8%)
DEBATE GRADE: C
PROJECTED POST-DEBATE POSITION: 10th

.

NO. 7 – JEB BUSH

.
PRE-DEBATE POSITION: 2nd (12.8%)
DEBATE GRADE: C-
PROJECTED POST-DEBATE POSITION: 2nd

.

NO. 8 – CHRIS CHRISTIE

.
PRE-DEBATE POSITION: 9th (3.4%)
DEBATE GRADE: C-
PROJECTED POST-DEBATE POSITION: 9th

.

NO. 9 – RAND PAUL

.
PRE-DEBATE POSITION: 8th (4.8%)
DEBATE GRADE: D+
PROJECTED POST-DEBATE POSITION: 8th

.

NO. 10 – DONALD TRUMP

.
PRE-DEBATE POSITION: 1st (23.2%)
DEBATE GRADE: D
PROJECTED POST-DEBATE POSITION: 1st

.

Hillary Speaks To Women About Women At Women’s Summit – Ed Responds


.
The following quotes were taken from the above-embedded speech by Hillary Rotten Clinton at the 6th annual Women in the World summit. After each one, I have posted a response in the hopes that every leftist in America will take a few moments out of his or her (or its) utterly pointless day to write me some hate-mail.

Let’s begin.

“It doesn’t matter whether you’re a student or an artist, a journalist, an ambassador, maybe even a future president. We all have our stories.”

Fortunately for America, you’re none of those things.

“Some of you, I know, were with me in Beijing back in 1995 at the United Nations Fourth World Conference on Women. Representatives from 189 countries came together to declare with one voice that human rights are women’s rights, and women’s rights are human rights, once and for all.”

I wonder how many Islamic countries were involved in that event. No matter, I’m sure that by now every Muslim-run nation on Earth has fully embraced women’s rights. After all, wasn’t it you who once said that Islam respects the fundamental dignity of all human beings?

“All the evidence tells us that despite the enormous obstacles that remain, there has never been a better time in history to be born female.”

Especially if you’re born in the United States, and your last name is Clinton.

“Yes, we’ve cut the maternal mortality rate in half, but far too many women are still denied critical access to reproductive healthcare, and safe childbirth.”

Yes, and while the maternal mortality rate has surely been cut substantially over the decades, leftists like you have worked overtime to help dramatically increase the mortality rate of unborn infants. How proud you must be.

“All the laws we’ve passed don’t count for much if they’re not enforced.”

You mean like the various Obamacare laws that you claim the president has every right to amend whenever he sees fit? And don’t even get me started on the immigration laws he habitually ignores or rewrites whenever the mood strikes him. By the way, I’m not holding my breath waiting for you to express outrage over any of Barack’s numerous, impeachable offenses. If you had any genuine respect for the law, you wouldn’t have intentionally destroyed untold thousands of emails belonging to the American people from your illegally-employed, private computer server in Chappaqua.

“Laws have to be backed up with resources and political will, and deep-seeded cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed.”

Are you referring to the deep-seeded cultural codes and religious beliefs of genuine Christians and Jews who don’t just pay lip-service to them in order to win elections, but actually live them every day? Just curious.

“As I have said, and as I believe, the advancement of the full participation of women and girls in every aspect of their societies is the great unfinished business of the 21st century. And not just for women, but for everyone.”

Well then, it’s a good thing there’s a section of Obamacare that forces single men to pay for maternity coverage that they can’t possibly use, don’t you think?

“If we closed the gap that remains in the workforce between men and women, our economy in the United States would grow by nearly 10 percent by 2030.”

It’s too bad that leftist policies – like the ones you’ve spent your entire adult life promoting – encourage women to have children out of wedlock, and then reward them with taxpayer dollars for sitting on their asses and watching ‘The View’. That’s got to be disappointing.

“The lack of quality, affordable childcare, unequal pay, work schedules that are not only far from predictable but often simply unfair, fall disproportionately heavily on women.”

It seems to me that there are only two realistic ways to make childcare more affordable. A.) Force childcare facilities – which are mostly run by women – to charge less for their services, or B.) force women to stay home and take care of their own kids while their husbands work. Beyond that, the notion that there is any real inequality in pay between men and women who work equal numbers of hours at equally difficult jobs is just another leftist myth invented by politicians like you. By the way, what is it about unpredictable work schedules that makes them less fair to women than men?

“It is outrageous that America is the only country in the developed world that doesn’t guarantee paid leave to mothers of newborns.”

So, not only should companies be expected to hire an equal number of women and men – even though only women take maternity leave – but now they should be forced to pay women who’ve chosen to have kids wages for not working? How is that fair to all the other employees who still have to put in a 40-hour workweek before receiving a paycheck?

“It’s hard to believe that in 2015 so many women still pay a price for being mothers.”

What, you mean that after all this time people are still expected to incur the costs associated with the decision they make? I am fucking shocked beyond words.

“It is also hard to believe that so many women are still paid less than men for the same work, with even wider gaps for women of color.”

That truly is hard to believe, mostly because it isn’t so. Think about it, if such an absurdity were true, what employer in his right mind would ever hire a white man again?

“Now, when I talk to men about this – which I frequently do – I remind them, if it was your wife or your sister or your daughter or your mother getting taken advantage of at work, you would suffer, your kids would suffer, your family would suffer, and you’d want to do something about it.”

I sure would, and it’s a damned good thing that’s never happened to any woman I know.

“America moves forward when all women are guaranteed the right to make their own healthcare choices, not when those choices are taken away by an employer like Hobby Lobby.”

What rights or choices were taken away from women by that company, exactly? Are you suggesting that Hobby Lobby’s female employees are no longer allowed to use contraceptives? As far as I’m aware, the only thing its owners have ever asked for is that they not be forced by the government to add contraception coverage to their employees’ health insurance policies, because their religious faith does not allow them to disseminate birth control – especially the abortion-inducing drugs included in the infamous Obamacare mandate. Since when does anyone have a right to force the people they work for to provide them with contraceptives that they can easily and cheaply buy on the open market themselves? For that matter, when did products designed to prevent people from conceiving children get redefined as elements of health care?

“when we deny women access to retirement that is secure; when we continue – as we do – to discriminate against women in the Social Security system, we are leaving too many women on their own.”

How are “we” denying women access to a secure retirement? Is there some law I haven’t heard about that prevents American citizens of the female persuasion from saving money in a private account for that purpose? As for Social Security, payments from that system are based on lifetime earnings figures, so the more you make and pay into it over the years, the larger your S.S. checks will be when you retire. A person’s gender has nothing to do with that equation, and the truth of the matter is that women generally live longer than men by several years, so they actually receive a larger percentage of S.S. funds overall.

“We move forward when gay and transgender women are embraced as our colleagues and friends, not fired from good jobs because of who they love or who they are.”

What exactly is a transgender woman? Do you mean a man who wears dresses and pretends to be a woman? And when was the last time you heard of someone being fired simply because they weren’t heterosexual? Just what decade are you living in, anyway?

“We move forward when women who came to this country in search of a better life can earn a path to citizenship.”

That’s been going on since this nation was founded. So, unless President Obama drafted an executive order recently that prevents women from legally immigrating to the U.S. and doing what is required under the U.S. Code to become a naturalized citizen, what’s the problem?

“There are those who offer themselves as leaders who even play politics with the nomination of our nation’s chief law enforcement officer…”

Yes there are. That’s because the Attorney General of the U.S. is a political appointee, and the most recent nominee for that office will be replacing the most politically biased AG in the history of the republic. Of course, I wouldn’t expect someone like you to understand partisan bickering over presidential appointments. Why, you’re as pure as the wind-driven snow when it comes to such things, right? I mean, you’ve never spoken out politically about a Republican president’s choice for – say – the federal judiciary, have you?

“Here in the United States, just last week we saw fast-food workers marching in the streets, asking for nothing more than a living wage and a chance at the American dream.”

What they were actually doing was calling for the unionization of the entire fast-food industry, and insisting that their employers pay them $15 an hour to do entry-level jobs that most well-trained chimpanzees would do for a bunch of grapes and a ripe banana. Then they went on to threaten larger protests in the future if their unreasonable demands weren’t met. But then, who cares about little things like facts when you’re committed to demonizing American businesses for purely political gain, right?

Sincerely,

Edward L. Daley

.

Ed Declares April 23rd ‘Global Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Appreciation Day’!


Today we celebrate CARBON DIOXIDE, which – like oxygen and dihydrogen monoxide – is crucial to the existence of life on Earth.

.

.
Wikipedia: Carbon dioxide (chemical formula CO2) is a colorless, odorless gas vital to plant life on earth. This naturally occurring chemical compound is composed of two oxygen atoms each covalently double bonded to a single carbon atom. Carbon dioxide exists in the Earth’s atmosphere as a trace gas at a concentration of about 0.04 percent (400 ppm) by volume. Its presence in the atmosphere comes primarily from three sources: it is a byproduct of animal respiration, it is a product of the combustion of materials with carbon in them, and it is a byproduct of natural decomposition done by microorganisms like bacteria and fungi. Since carbon dioxide is soluble in water, it is found naturally in the oceans; it is also a major component of carbonated beverages and some types of wine and beer. The frozen solid form of CO2 is available as a commodity in many Western supermarkets, where it goes by the name of dry ice.

As part of the carbon cycle, plants, algae, and cyanobacteria use light energy to photosynthesize carbohydrate from carbon dioxide and water, with oxygen produced as a waste product. However, photosynthesis cannot occur in darkness and at night some carbon dioxide is produced by plants during respiration. It is produced during the respiration of all other aerobic organisms and is exhaled in the breath of air-breathing land animals, including humans. Carbon dioxide is produced during the processes of decay of organic materials and the fermentation of sugars in beer and winemaking. It is produced by combustion of wood, carbohydrates and major carbon- and hydrocarbon-rich fossil fuels such as coal, peat, petroleum and natural gas. It is emitted from volcanoes, hot springs and geysers and is freed from carbonate rocks by dissolution in water and acids. CO2 is found in lakes, at depth under the sea and commingled with oil and gas deposits.

.

.

While it has recently become fashionable for Marxists morons to demonize carbon dioxide, we here at the DALEY GATOR would like to take a moment to pay tribute to this remarkable chemical compound.

.

.
Plants Need CO2: Literally thousands of laboratory and field experiments have conclusively demonstrated that enriching the air with carbon dioxide stimulates the growth and development of nearly all plants. They have also revealed that higher-than-normal CO2 concentrations dramatically enhance the efficiency with which plants utilize water, sometimes as much as doubling it in response to a doubling of the air’s CO2 content. These CO2-induced improvements typically lead to the development of more extensive and active root systems, enabling plants to more thoroughly explore larger volumes of soil in search of the things they need. Consequently, even in soils lacking sufficient water and nutrients for good growth at today’s CO2 concentrations, plants exposed to the elevated atmospheric CO2 levels expected in the future generally show remarkable increases in vegetative productivity, which should enable them to successfully colonize low-rainfall areas that are presently too dry to support more than isolated patches of desert vegetation.

Elevated levels of atmospheric CO2 also enable plants to better withstand the growth-retarding effects of various environmental stresses, including soil salinity, air pollution, high and low air temperatures, and air-borne and soil-borne plant pathogens. In fact, atmospheric CO2 enrichment can actually mean the difference between life and death for vegetation growing in extremely stressful circumstances. In light of these facts, it is not surprising that Earth’s natural and managed ecosystems have already benefited immensely from the increase in atmospheric CO2 that has accompanied the progression of the Industrial Revolution; and they will further prosper from future CO2 increases.

.

.

“Green” activists (aka idiots) want your children to believe that man-made CO2 is a polutant, and that the Earth is in danger of overheating from excess industrial activity. This is a ridiculous notion advanced by leftist ideologues for the sole purpose of repressing the wealth-creation and prosperity of the U.S. and other western nations.

.

.
The Australian: Looking back over millennia, today the Earth is colder, and has a lower level of atmospheric CO2 than during nearly all the history of modern life. The idea that it would be catastrophic if CO2 were to increase and average global temperature were to rise a few degrees is preposterous.

[…]

Climate change has become a powerful political force for many reasons. First, it is universal; we are told everything on Earth is threatened. Second, it invokes the two most powerful human motivators: fear and guilt. We fear driving our car will kill our grandchildren and feel guilty. Third, a powerful convergence of interests among key elites support the climate “narrative”. Environmentalists spread fear and raise donations; politicians appear to be saving the Earth from doom; the media has a field day with sensation and conflict; science institutions raise billions in grants, create whole new departments, and engage in a feeding frenzy of scary scenarios; business wants to look green, and get huge public subsidies for projects that would otherwise be economic losers, such as large wind farms and solar arrays. Fourth, the Left sees climate change as a perfect means to redistribute wealth from industrial countries to the developing world and the UN bureaucracy.

.

.

Don’t let the Commie green-shirts of the world destroy your children’s future. Get in their smug, stupid little faces and let them know that you aren’t going to just sit back and watch as they brainwash the next generation into committing economic suicide. I say, fuck all the Gorebots you find with a red-hot poker… uh, metaphorically speaking, of course. It’s about damned time that we – the sane majority – confront these parasitic dimwits en masse, and boot them off their unearned moral high horses once and for all. Three cheers for CO2!

.

Ed Answers The Most Prevalent Conservative ‘Earth Day’ Question Of All


Q.) Why do leftists embrace the scientifically disproved – and otherwise nonsensical – notion of anthropomorphic (human-caused), catastrophic climate change?

A.) For the same reasons that they embrace Marxism; because they want to, and because they’re not very bright.

No, REALLY! Those are the reasons. They’re just a bunch of incurious dimwits who exhibit no capacity for self-reflection, self-correction or self-improvement. To quote Lieutenant General Russel L. Honoré, they are truly “stuck on stupid”.

.

Ed Thanks The Daley Gator’s Website Host ‘WordPress’… Just For Being Cool (Video)


Thanks bunches, WordPress peeps. Me love you long time.

And now, this:

.

.

Ed Thinks Up A Way To Improve The NFL Post-Season – A JV Super Bowl


.
Although I have essentially boycotted the NFL this season – due to the fact that it has become a politically correct nightmare in recent years – I am hopeful that one day the people who run it will regain their senses and begin acting like real men again. Should that happen, I have devised a little scheme that I believe could help to enhance the professional football fan’s post-season experience.

First of all, get rid of the Pro Bowl altogether. It is, and has always been, a completely pointless game that people only watch out of sheer boredom, so just END IT already!

Secondly, replace it with a game between two actual NFL teams – not a one-time collection of individual super stars – that can be incentivized to play the game as if it wasn’t some sort of half-assed practice scrimmage.

Here’s how my plan works:

Take the two best, non-playoff teams from both the AFC and NFC respectively – four teams total – and pit them against each other in two initial “bowl games” during the post-season.

Example: this year’s contestants would be the Houston Texans, the Kansas City Chiefs, the Philadelphia Eagles, and the San Francisco 49ers.

The AFC’s bowl game could be named for the best coach that the conference has ever produced, Chuck Noll, while the NFC’s could be named for its greatest coach, Vince Lombardi.

The winners of these two games would then play each other in a sort of JV version of the Super Bowl. It could be named after the place where America’s first wholly professional football game was played, Latrobe, Pennsylvania.

So how would this work exactly?

Well, the first two games could be played on the Monday and Tuesday nights immediately following the league’s divisional playoff games.

The “Latrobe Bowl” could be played two weeks later on the Sunday between the conference championships and the Super Bowl.

The incetives to win this game could be A.) player bonuses equal to – say – half those of the Super Bowl champions, and B.) an additional first round pick in the following college draft for the team’s general manager. Oh, and C.) the coach could get a nice trophy for his display case.

The losers could get free bus tickets home… and maybe some Arby’s gift certificates.

And that’s it! That’s my brief outline for improving the NFL post-season picture.

Feel free to express your own thoughts on this subject in the comments section below.

.

Ed’s 2016 Executive Branch Dream Team (Videos)


PRESIDENT – TED CRUZ
U.S. Senator/Former Texas Solicitor General/Former Director Of The Office Of Policy Planning For The Federal Trade Commission/Former Associate Deputy Attorney General For The U.S. Department Of Justice/Former Domestic Policy Advisor To U.S. President George W. Bush For The 2000 Bush-Cheney Campaign/Former Adjunct Professor Of Law At The University Of Texas School Of Law, Austin/Attorney

.

VICE PRESIDENT – SCOTT WALKER
Wisconsin Governor/Former Wisconsin State Assemblyman/Former Milwaukee County Executive/Former Marketer And Fundraiser For The American Red Cross

.

CHIEF OF STAFF – MARK LEVIN
President Of The Landmark Legal Foundation/Former Associate Director Of Presidential Personnel For The Reagan Administration/Former Deputy Assistant Secretary For Elementary And Secondary Education At The U.S. Department Of Education/Former Deputy Solicitor At The U.S. Department Of The Interior/Former Chief Of Staff To Attorney General Edwin Meese/Talk Raido Host/Historian/Author/Attorney

.

ATTORNEY GENERAL – TREY GOWDY
U.S. Congressman/Former District Attorney For South Carolina’s Seventh Judicial Circuit/Former Federal Prosecutor With The U.S. Attorney For The District Of South Carolina/Former Law Clerk For John P. Gardner On The South Carolina Court Of Appeals And United States District Court Judge Ross Anderson/Attorney

.

SECRETARY OF HOMELAND SECURITY – FRANK GAFFNEY
Founder And President Of The Center For Security Policy/Founder Of The Set America Free Coalition/Former Deputy Assistant Secretary Of Defense For Nuclear Forces And Arms Control Policy/Former Assistant Secretary Of Defense For International Security Policy/Former Senate Armed Services Committee Staff Member/Talk Radio Host/Producer/Columnist/Author

.

SECRETARY OF DEFENSE – STANLEY MCCHRYSTAL
Retired United States Army Four-Star General/Former Commander Of International Security Assistance Force/Former Commander Of U.S. Forces Afghanistan/Former Director Of Joint Staff/ Former Commander Of Joint Special Operations Command

.

DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE – KEITH ALEXANDER
United States Army Four-Star General/Director Of The National Security Agency/Chief Of The Central Security Service/Commander Of The United States Cyber Command/Former Deputy Chief Of Staff, G-2, U.S. Army

.

SECRETARY OF STATE – JOHN BOLTON
Former Ambassador To The United Nations/Former Assistant Secretary For International Organization Affairs At The Department Of State/Former Assistant Attorney General At The Department Of Justice/Former Assistant Administrator For Program And Policy Coordination At The U.S. Agency For International Development/Former General Counsel At The U.S. Agency For International Development/Attorney

.

CHAIRMAN OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE – MARK THORNTON
Senior Fellow At The Ludwig Von Mises Institute/Book Review Editor Of The Quarterly Journal Of Austrian Economics/Former Editor Of The Austrian Economics Newsletter/Editorial Board Member Of The Journal Of Libertarian Studies/Former Economics Professor At Auburn University At Montgomery And Trinity University In Texas/Former Assistant Superintendent Of Banking And Economic Adviser To Alabama Governor Fob James/Author

.

SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY – THOMAS SOWELL
Senior Fellow At The Hoover Institution At Stanford University/Former Professor Of Economics At Howard University, Rutgers University, Cornell University, Brandeis University, Amherst College And UCLA/Former Fellow At The Center For Advanced Study In The Behavioral Sciences At Stanford University/Former Project Director At The Urban Institute/Columnist/Author

.

DIRECTOR OF THE OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET – NEWT GINGRICH
Former Speaker Of The U.S. House Of Representatives/Architect Of The ‘Contract With America’/Former House Minority Whip/Former Time Magazine ‘Man Of The Year’/Former Assistant Professor Of History And Geography At West Georgia College/Founder And Chairman Of American Solutions For Winning The Future And The Center For Health Transformation/Founder Of The Conservative Opportunity Society/Distinguished Visiting Scholar And Professor At The United States Air Force’s Air University And The National Defense University/Member Of The Council On Foreign Relations/Guiding Coalition Member Of The Project On National Security Reform/Founder And Chairman Of Gingrich Productions/Political Consultant/Historian/Lecturer/Author

.

SECRETARY OF ENERGY – REX TILLERSON
Chairman, President And CEO Of Exxon Mobil Corporation/Engineer/Trustee For The Center For Strategic And International Studies And The American Petroleum Institute/Former President Of Exxon Yemen Inc And Esso Exploration And Production Khorat Incorporated/Former Vice President Of Exxon Ventures/Former President Of Exxon Neftegas Limited/Former Executive Vice President Of ExxonMobil Development Company

.

SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR – SARAH PALIN
Former Alaska Governor/Former Wasilla Mayor/Former Wasilla City Councilwoman/Former Chairwoman Of The Alaska Oil And Gas Conservation Commission/Former Head Of The Fellowship Of Christian Athletes/Former Sportscaster For KTUU-TV And KTVA-TV/Former Sports Reporter For The Mat-Su Valley Frontiersman/Former Miss Wasilla/Political Commentator/Author

.

SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS – ALLEN WEST
Former U.S. Congressman/Retired United States Army Lieutenant Colonel/Former Military Professional Resources Incorporated Adviser To The Afghan National Army/Former U.S. History Teacher And Track And Field Coach At Deerfield Beach High School, Deerfield Beach, Florida/Founder Of The Allen West Guardian Fund And The Allen West Foundation/Political Commentator/Columnist/Author

.

UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE – TERRY MILLER
Director Of The Center For International Trade And Economics/Kolokotrones Fellow In Economic Freedom At The Heritage Foundation/Editor Of The Annual Index Of Economic Freedom/Former Ambassador To The United Nations Economic And Social Council/Former Deputy Assistant Secretary Of State For Economic And Global Issues/Former Director Of The Office Of Agricultural And Textile Trade/Former Director Of The Office Of Human Rights, Social And Refugee Affairs/Former Director Of Economic And Development Affairs At The Bureau Of International Organisations/Former Head Of The U.S. Observer Mission To The U.N. Educational, Scientific And Cultural Organization/Former Head Of The U.S. Delegation To The U.N. Conference On Trade And Development/Former Lead Negotiator For The Monterrey Consensus On Financing For Development/Columnist

.

DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT – JOE ARPAIO
Sheriff Of Maricopa County, Arizona/Former Military Policeman In The U.S Army/Former Police Officer In Las Vegas, Nevada/Former Special Agent With The Federal Bureau Of Narcotics (Later DEA)/Former Head Of The DEA’s Arizona Branch/Author

.

SURGEON GENERAL – BEN CARSON
Former Director Of Pediatric Neurosurgery And Professor Of Neurosurgery, Oncology, Plastic Surgery And Pediatrics At Johns Hopkins Hospital/Former Co-Director Of The Johns Hopkins Craniofacial Center/Recipient Of The Presidential Medal Of Freedom/Member Of The American Academy Of Achievement And The Horatio Alger Association Of Distinguished Americans/Recipient Of The Jefferson Award For Greatest Public Service Benefiting The Disadvantaged/Member Of The National Academy Of Sciences Institute Of Medicine/Holder Of 38 Honorary Doctorate Degrees/Columnist/Political Commentator/Author

.

SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION – TED HOUGHTON
Chairman Of The Texas Transportation Commission/Former Member Of The El Paso School Land Board/Former Member Of The El Paso Water Utilities Public Service Board/Former Member Of The El Paso Rapid Transit Board/Former Vice President And Chairman Of The El Paso Public Relations And Communications Committee/Former Treasurer Of The El Paso Political Action Committee/Former Member Of The El Paso Electric Company Board Of Directors/Former President Of The Sun Bowl Association/Former Member Of The 1984 Los Angeles Olympic Committee

.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES – PAMELA PAULK
Senior Vice President For Human Resources For The Johns Hopkins Health System And Johns Hopkins Medicine/Co-Founder And President Of The Baltimore Alliance For Careers In Healthcare/President Of The Baltimore Community Mediation Board Of Directors/Member Of The Baltimore Employee Health Plan Board Of Directors/Member Of The Baltimore Leadership Class Of 2000/Member Of The Baltimore Workforce Investment Board/Former Director Of Operations Integration For The Johns Hopkins Health System/Former Interim Director For Johns Hopkins Home Care Group/Former Vice President Of Johns Hopkins International Global Services/Former National Consultant And Senior Vice President Of Operations For A Private Psychiatric Practice

.

PRESS SECRETARY – BILL WHITTLE
Co-founder Of Declaration Entertainment/Director/Screenwriter/Editor/Narrator/Political Commentator/Columnist/Pilot/Video Blogger/Author

.

————————————————————————————————————————
.

NEW OFFICES/AGENCIES

SECRETARY OF FREE MARKET CAPITALISM – ARTHUR BROOKS
President Of The American Enterprise Institute/Curry Scholar In Free Enterprise At The American Enterprise Institute/Former Professor Of Business, Economics, Social Entrepreneurship And Government At Syracuse University/Former Professor Of Public Administration At Syracuse University/Former Associate Professor At Syracuse University Maxwell School Of Citizenship And Public Affairs/Former Associate Professor At Syracuse University Whitman School Of Management/Former Assistant Professor Of Public Administration And Economics At Georgia State University/Former Doctoral Fellow And Consultant At The RAND Corporation/Former Professor Of French Horn At Lynn University Harid Conservatory Of Music/Former Classical French Hornist/Economist/Columnist/Author

.

DIRECTOR OF GOVERNMENT DOWNSIZING – THOMAS SCHATZ
President Of Citizens Against Government Waste And Its Lobbying Affiliate The Council For Citizens Against Government Waste/Former Legislative Director For Congressman Hamilton Fish Jr./Spokesman/Attorney/Columnist

.

————————————————————————————————————————
.

DISCONTINUED OFFICES/AGENCIES

SECRETARY OF COMMERCE
SECRETARY OF LABOR
SECRETARY OF EDUCATION
SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE
SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
AMBASSADOR TO THE UNITED NATIONS

.

*VIDEOS* Ed’s Rock/Pop Primer For Douchey Little Millennials Who Don’t Know Shit About Music


The following compilation represents but a small percentage of great rock & roll and pop songs produced over the span of nearly half a century. I have decided not to include any tunes created after the year 2000, simply because the past 13 years have sucked ass, musically speaking.

And so, without further ado, here’s my introductory course on music appreciation designed specifically to educate all you worthless, whiny, self-important teens out there who’ve come of age after that sad, fateful day when good music was officially declared dead by anyone who knows what the fuck they’re talking about.

You’re welcome.

THE 50S
.
ROCK AROUND THE CLOCK


.
THE GREAT PRETENDER

.
LONG TALL SALLY

.
BLUE MOON

.
SINCE I DON’T HAVE YOU

.
GREAT BALLS OF FIRE

.
JOHNNY B. GOODE

.
RAVE ON

.
JAILHOUSE ROCK

.
SMOKE GETS IN YOUR EYES

.
.
THE 60S
.
LOUIE LOUIE

.
YOU REALLY GOT ME

.
SHE’S NOT THERE

.
MY GENERATION

.
BREAK ON THROUGH

.
MAGIC CARPET RIDE

.
VOODOO CHILD

.
WHITE RABBIT

.
SYMPATHY FOR THE DEVIL

.
COME TOGETHER

.
.
THE 70S
.
AQUALUNG

.
MAMA TOLD ME NOT TO COME

.
STAIRWAY TO HEAVEN

.
BALLROOM BLITZ

.
MORE THAN A FEELING

.
HOTEL CALIFORNIA

.
JESUS JUST LEFT CHICAGO

.
I’VE SEEN ALL GOOD PEOPLE

.
STUCK IN THE MIDDLE WITH YOU

.
DO IT AGAIN

.
ROCK ON

.
ONLY WOMEN BLEED

.
BAD COMPANY

.
BOHEMIAN RHAPSODY

.
THUNDER ROAD

.
SWEET EMOTION

.
CARRY ON MY WAYWARD SON

.
THE CHAIN

.
DO YOU FEEL LIKE WE DO

.
WEREWOLVES OF LONDON

.
IF YOU WANT BLOOD YOU’VE GOT IT

.
COMFORTABLY NUMB

.
SULTANS OF SWING

.
.
THE 80S
.
PRIVATE IDAHO

.
TOM SAWYER

.
THE MAGNIFICENT SEVEN

.
DON’T STOP BELIEVIN’

.
BLISTER IN THE SUN

.
EVERY BREATH YOU TAKE

.
MIDDLE OF THE ROAD

.
MAMA

.
LITTLE WING

.
WITH OR WITHOUT YOU

.
.
THE 90S
.
NO MORE TEARS

.
SILENT LUCIDITY

.
ABOUT A GIRL

.
SHE TALKS TO ANGELS

.
BLACK

.
BECAUSE THE NIGHT

.
CREEP

.
YOU DON’T KNOW HOW IT FEELS

.
IRIS

.
DOWN WITH THE SICKNESS

.

Ed’s Newest Intellectual Concoction: The NEW Mainstream News Media Convention (NMNMC)

Nearly everybody who runs a right-leaning political blog these days talks about the “mainstream news media”, but I’m here to tell you that this term no longer applies to entities like MSNBC, the Washington Post, CNN, CBS News, or even the HOLY New York F-ing Times.

Those organizations – and every pitiful, leftist, smear merchant like them – will soon be as dead as Al Gore’s integrity, and good riddance to bad rubbish.

Yet, despite the imminent demise of such companies, no single conservative news organization has leapt to the forefront to fill the vacuum that the aforementioned Marxist propaganda tools have left behind them.

Oh sure, there’s Fox News, but if you really believe that this charming little station brings you honest, hard-hitting, meaningful news on a regular basis, you’ve been setting your information bar WAY too low.

Take it from someone who reads upwards of 50 news blogs a day from all over the world, while what you get from Fox is easily preferable to what you’d get from every other TV news source, that doesn’t make it a necessarily GOOD news source. It just makes it the best one that television has to offer.

Oh, and by the way, television too is as dead as my grandfather’s boyhood dog… it just doesn’t know it yet.

The future of news and information, like the future of home entertainment, was hard-wired into the net from its inception. The only reason most Americans haven’t already cancelled their cable or satellite TV subscriptions is because old habits die hard.

But die they must, and once the majority of people in this country begin to understand that there is nothing you can find on TV that can’t be found on-demand online – and a lot cheaper as well – believe me, the boob-tube is toast.

Therefore, the smart play for right-wing news junkies would be to create an online broadcast news network (heck, maybe even call it OBN) and bring together the best conservative-minded commentators to share with the world the news that most Americans want to know, the opinions that most Americans can appreciate, and the patriotic spirit that ALL Americans need in their lives.

To this end I now introduce the concept of the ‘NEW Mainstream News Media Convention’, the purpose of which is to round up the most politically active, media-savvy and net-proficient individuals in the conservative community, so that they may discuss the practicalities of creating such an online news network.

Here’s my list of candidates for such a venture.

.
Bill Whittle – http://billwhittle.net


.

Joel Pollak – http://www.breitbart.com


.

Dana Loesch – http://danaloeschradio.com


.

Brent Bozell – http://www.mrc.org


.

Alfonzo Rachel – http://alfonzorachel.com


.

S.E. Cupp – http://thesecupp.com


.

Matt Drudge – http://www.drudgereport.com


.

Kevin Jackson – http://theblacksphere.net


.

Andrew Klavan – http://www.andrewklavan.com


.

Jason Mattera – http://www.jasonmattera.com


.

Michelle Malkin – http://michellemalkin.com


.

Steven Crowder – http://stevencrowder.net


.

Bob Parks – http://www.black-and-right.com


.

James O’Keefe – http://www.theprojectveritas.com


.

Pamela Geller – http://pamelageller.com


.

Tom Trento – https://www.teapartycommunity.com


.

Please take note that the above list is by no means complete, nor do I believe that merely posting a blog entry such as this will lead in any direct way to the sort of grand scheme I’ve laid out before you.

Still, it’s not a bad idea, on balance, and if any of my good friends out there in cyberland should decide to share this concept with those among us who might possibly possess the wherewithal to make my humble dream a reality, I’d consider those folks to be FREAKIN’ AWESOME!

.

Ed’s NFL Playoffs Third Round Picks – 2013


San Francisco 49ers @ Atlanta Falcons –

Baltimore Ravens @ New England Patriots

.
.
——— 2013 Playoffs Second Round Picks ——— 1 Right3 Wrong ———
.
.
——— 2013 Playoffs First Round Picks ——— 3 Right1 Wrong ———
.
.
——— 2012 Regular Season Picks Record ——— 186 Right69 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 17 Picks ——— 13 Right3 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 16 Picks ——— 12 Right4 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 15 Picks ——— 12 Right4 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 14 Picks ——— 12 Right4 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 13 Picks ——— 11 Right5 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 12 Picks ——— 11 Right5 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 11 Picks ——— 12 Right2 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 10 Picks ——— 10 Right3 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 9 Picks ——— 12 Right2 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 8 Picks ——— 11 Right3 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 7 Picks ——— 12 Right1 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 6 Picks ——— 6 Right8 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 5 Picks ——— 11 Right3 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 4 Picks ——— 14 Right1 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 3 Picks ——— 7 Right9 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 2 Picks ——— 10 Right6 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 1 Picks ——— 10 Right6 Wrong ———
.
.
——— 2011 Regular Season Picks Record ——— 179 Right77 Wrong ———
.

Ed’s NFL Playoffs Second Round Picks – 2013

Baltimore Ravens @ Denver Broncos

Green Bay Packers @ San Francisco 49ers –

Seattle Seahawks @ Atlanta Falcons –

Houston Texans @ New England Patriots

.
.
——— 2013 Playoffs First Round Picks ——— 3 Right1 Wrong ———
.
.
——— 2012 Regular Season Picks Record ——— 186 Right69 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 17 Picks ——— 13 Right3 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 16 Picks ——— 12 Right4 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 15 Picks ——— 12 Right4 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 14 Picks ——— 12 Right4 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 13 Picks ——— 11 Right5 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 12 Picks ——— 11 Right5 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 11 Picks ——— 12 Right2 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 10 Picks ——— 10 Right3 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 9 Picks ——— 12 Right2 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 8 Picks ——— 11 Right3 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 7 Picks ——— 12 Right1 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 6 Picks ——— 6 Right8 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 5 Picks ——— 11 Right3 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 4 Picks ——— 14 Right1 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 3 Picks ——— 7 Right9 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 2 Picks ——— 10 Right6 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 1 Picks ——— 10 Right6 Wrong ———
.
.
——— 2011 Regular Season Picks Record ——— 179 Right77 Wrong ———
.

Ed’s NFL Playoffs First Round Picks – 2013

Cincinnati Bengals @ Houston Texans

Minnesota Vikings @ Green Bay Packers

Indianapolis Colts @ Baltimore Ravens –

Seattle Seahawks @ Washington Redskins –

.
.
——— 2012 Regular Season Picks Record ——— 186 Right69 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 17 Picks ——— 13 Right3 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 16 Picks ——— 12 Right4 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 15 Picks ——— 12 Right4 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 14 Picks ——— 12 Right4 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 13 Picks ——— 11 Right5 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 12 Picks ——— 11 Right5 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 11 Picks ——— 12 Right2 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 10 Picks ——— 10 Right3 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 9 Picks ——— 12 Right2 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 8 Picks ——— 11 Right3 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 7 Picks ——— 12 Right1 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 6 Picks ——— 6 Right8 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 5 Picks ——— 11 Right3 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 4 Picks ——— 14 Right1 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 3 Picks ——— 7 Right9 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 2 Picks ——— 10 Right6 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 1 Picks ——— 10 Right6 Wrong ———
.
.
——— 2011 Regular Season Picks Record ——— 179 Right77 Wrong ———
.

Ed’s NFL Week 17 Picks – 2012


New York Jets @ Buffalo Bills

Carolina Panthers @ New Orleans Saints

Tampa Bay Buccaneers @ Atlanta Falcons

Baltimore Ravens @ Cincinnati Bengals

Cleveland Browns @ Pittsburgh Steelers

Houston Texans @ Indianapolis Colts –

Jacksonville Jaguars @ Tennessee Titans

Philadelphia Eagles @ New York Giants

Chicago Bears @ Detroit Lions –

Miami Dolphins @ New England Patriots

Green Bay Packers @ Minnesota Vikings

Oakland Raiders @ San Diego Chargers

Kansas City Chiefs @ Denver Broncos

Arizona Cardinals @ San Francisco 49ers

Saint Louis Rams @ Seattle Seahawks

Dallas Cowboys @ Washington Redskins

.
.
——— 2012 Picks Record So Far ——— 186 Right69 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 16 Picks ——— 12 Right4 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 15 Picks ——— 12 Right4 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 14 Picks ——— 12 Right4 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 13 Picks ——— 11 Right5 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 12 Picks ——— 11 Right5 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 11 Picks ——— 12 Right2 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 10 Picks ——— 10 Right3 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 9 Picks ——— 12 Right2 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 8 Picks ——— 11 Right3 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 7 Picks ——— 12 Right1 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 6 Picks ——— 6 Right8 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 5 Picks ——— 11 Right3 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 4 Picks ——— 14 Right1 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 3 Picks ——— 7 Right9 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 2 Picks ——— 10 Right6 Wrong ———
.
.
——— Week 1 Picks ——— 10 Right6 Wrong ———
.
.
——— 2011 Picks Record ——— 179 Right77 Wrong ———
.

Ed’s Important, Second Amendment-Related Question O’ The Day


……………..
.