Lesbian Couple Burned Down Their Own House For Insurance Money; Claimed It Was A Hate Crime

Hate Hoax: Lesbians Burn Down Their Own House – Moonbattery


Yet another hate hoax for the files. From Vonore, Tennessee:

The community rallied behind a same-sex couple after their home burned to the ground, but in a twist, a jury found the couple intentionally set fire to their house.

After five days, a jury found Carol Anne and Laura Stutte deliberately set fire to their home, blaming the fire on their neighbor. On May 13, 2011, the Stutte’s insurance company filed the lawsuit in federal court saying they found evidence the couple deliberately set fire to their property and claimed the insurance money.

It was not just insurance fraud, but ideological fraud:

In September of 2010, the Stuttes said the fire was a hate crime after the word “queer” was spray painted on their garage. They filed a lawsuit claiming their neighbor, Janice Millsaps, harassed them and even used the same derogatory word in the months leading up to the fire. They say they felt like they were targeted because they were lesbians. Millsaps filed a counter lawsuit against the couple, denying she harassed the couple or set the fire.

Apparently Carol Anne and Laura were not ideal neighbors. But they should get along well enough with the rest of the characters on the Hate Hoax List.



New York Middle School Girls Forced To Ask Classmates For “Lesbian Kiss”

NY Middle School Girls Forced To Ask Classmates For “Lesbian Kiss” Pretend Like They Are On a Date – Conservative Infidel

A New York middle school sponsored a workshop where 13 and 14 year-old girls were told to ask one another for a kiss and pretend like they were on a date.


A recent anti-bullying presentation at a middle school in New York that focused on homosexuality and gender identity has angered parents after their daughters have come home to tell them they were forced to ask another girl for a kiss.

According to reports, the session occurred last week at Linden Avenue Middle School in Red Hook, New York, near Poughkeepsie. A group of students from Bard College led two workshops for the youth, separated by gender.

During the workshop for girls, the 13 and 14-year-olds were told to ask one another for a lesbian kiss. They were also taught words such as “pansexual” and “genderqueer.”

Parent Mandy Coon told reporters that her daughter was very uncomfortable with the exercise.

“She told me, ‘Mom, we all get teased and picked on enough; now I’m going to be called a lesbian because I had to ask another girl if I could kiss her,’” she lamented.

Coon stated that she was especially irate over the matter because parents were given no warning about the presentations, nor an opportunity to opt out.

Click HERE For Rest Of Story


The sad truth about the Equality Pimps. They do not want equality, they want special considerations

Equality is such an easy ideal to embrace, it really is. I am fine with Gay marriage for instance, personally, I think it ought to be a state by state issue, with the people of the states making that decision. But, Gay marriage, like “equality” is not the issue with Gay activists. Gay activists, like all activists are people who have become obsessed with making everyone else live as the activist sees fit. It is not good enough for a Gay activist to allow different states to have different laws. NO, the activist must have all the states bend to their desires or else. If you are wondering, I have a natural distrust of anyone who calls themselves an activist. They set my BS meter off frankly. 

All of that brings me back to the Equality Pimps. Take what Stacy McCain has been blogging about lately for example. An 18-year -old girl, had sexual encounters with another girl, age 14. 14 is below the age of consent, so this 18-year-old Lesbian is finding out, as many boys over the age of 18 have found out, that actions, if they are sexual in nature with minors, have consequences. Sounds fair right? Sounds like equality to me. But, nit to the Gay activist types, who are trying to recreate the civil rights movement. I will let Stacy pick it up here


You know how the “Free Kate” crowd say they have no agenda beyond “fairness” and “equality”? There is reason to doubt:

If you get caught banging a 14-year-old, @MonWithMac has lots of tearful sympathy pic.twitter.com/mFi8mosm39 Only if you’re lesbian, though.

Again, this is being spun as a case of, wait for it, discrimination. But, if these girls were boys, they would still be in trouble. This is how EQUALITY works. You get treated equally, regardless of race, gender, or sexual orientation.
But it is not really equality that is the end game here is it?

It’s difficult to describe my reaction to Kristin Ireland’s tearful “Lifetime movie” sympathy for Paige in Pennsylvania, jailed for being an 18-year-old having sex with a 14-year-old girl.

According to Ireland, this is a story about “railroading and “discrimination,” as if 18-year-old guys in Pennsylvania were routinely banging 14-year-olds without any fear of prosecution.

I think not, ma’am.

And I think Kristin Ireland wouldn’t be boo-hooing if this was a teenage boy doing time for statutory rape. No, her sympathy is reserved entirely for her fellow lesbians, and so therefore either:

  1. We must create a special Gay Jailbait Loophole to prevent the prosecution of “consensual” gay sex with 14-year-olds;
  2. We must effectively end all prosecution for such crimes, hetero or homo, because equal application of the law would occasionally result in some 18-year-old lesbians going to jail for dating ninth-graders, and this would make Kristin Ireland cry.

As I said, I am all for equality, but the activists here? They are about themselves.

An undeniable truth, sex sells

Stacy McCain has been going after a story about a jailbait Lesbian scandal, involving an 18-year-old Lesbian, Kaitlyn Hunt and her 14-year-old “victim”. The case is fascinating on several fronts, and of course, Hunt is being used by the “Gay rights” crowd to further their cause. Then there is the matter of how old should one be before society accepts their decisions as to who they do the Horizontal Bop with. To me, 14 is a bit young for that, whether the sex is straight, or Lesbian, or Gay. Maybe 16 is a reasonable age for society to say “hey, they are old enough to make that choice”, but 14? Come on! The other aspect of this, which McCain explains is that some folks would call the accused, Hunt, cute. And, face facts, sex sells news stories just like it sells everything else.

Some friends have asked why I’m being such a hard-ass about the Kaitlyn Hunt case. Certainly, my personal experience and opinions are relevant to the situation, and perhaps later I’ll discuss the case in terms of my perspective as an erstwhile teenage hoodlum.

No one familiar with Rule Five of “How to Get a Million Hits on Your Blog” could miss the professional interest in a case where it is entirely legitimate to use Jailbait Lesbian Scandal as a headline.

Ouch. Stop. You’re twisting my arm.

This case involves serious matters of law, politics, culture and morality. It also involves journalism bias, with liberals pushing the #FreeKatepropaganda of gay victimhood, and it is that aspect of the Kaitlyn Hunt case that angers me most: Stop the damned lies.

Go read the rest, Stacy makes some fine points. As for me, I would make this point to those pretending that Kaitlyn Hunt is ONLY being charged because she is a Lesbian. PLENTY of young men have gotten in trouble over having sex with girls that are too young. The law is what it is, and if it is truly equality the Gay rights activists want, then they have it in this case, because if Kaitlyn Hunt were Kevin Hunt, then she would still be in hot water. In fact, there might be an argument that no one would be coming to “Kevin Hunt’s “defense. See that is the bad thing about equality. You do not get to scream “special privileges” when you break the rules. All the law cares about here is that an 18-year-old, messed around with a 14-year-old. Sexual orientation does not figure into it. Kaitlyn Hunt is no more a “victim” than any 18-year-old boy would be.

Boy, Stacy McCain really wants to be called a Homophobe

Stacy, who will be IMPOSSIBLE to live with if Alabama whips Notre Dame next month, links a story about a Lesbian, who was married to a man that might be the next mayor of New Yawk, and risks the dreaded Homophobe label!

Hunter Walker of the New York Observer highlights the lesbian past of Chirlane McCray who, for the past 20 years, has been the wife of Bill de Blasio, a likely candidate for mayor of New York City. Such stories are a lot less rare than the “gay gene” theorists would have you believe, but because the born-that-way mantra is essential to the argument that homosexuals should be treated as a special category for civil-rights purposes, these stories don’t usually get much attention.

Accusations of “homophobia” in 3, 2, 1 . . .

Me? I really could not care much less if they are born, or choose to play for the other team, that is not of concern to me, but it does remind me of a joke that might get me labelled a Homophobe.

Why don’t Lesbians wear makeup when they diet? Because you cannot eat Jenny Craig with Mary Kay on your face. Which reminds me that I should post about why service industry people HATE the women of Mary Kay. But, I will save that story for another time. Right now, I am waiting to see if I am called a Homophobe first, or accused of telling bad jokes. And, as an exit question, if people are born Homophobic, do they deserve civil rights protection? HMMMM

If you were wondering when gendered pronouns would be deemed offensive…………..

Wonder no more! Over at Hot Air Jazz Shaw has the latest on an outbreak of Offendeditis at Harvard

If you’re like me, (and aren’t you all?) I know you’ve been waiting impatiently with one question on your minds. When, oh when, will Harvard appoint a new permanent director of BGLTQ student life? (We’re going to circle back to that acronym which caught me by surprise in a few moments.) Fear not, readers, for your long wait is over. And the winner is

Vanidy M. Bailey will serve as director of Bisexual, Gay, Lesbian, Transgender, and Queer (BGLTQ) student life beginning July 16, dean of Harvard College Evelynn M. Hammonds announced this week. Bailey, who will report to the assistant dean of student life, will oversee all initiatives that support BGLTQ undergraduates.

So… we’ve got that little chore out of the way. But wait! Steyn discoversthat yet another grievous social injustice has taken place even in the midst of this happy occasion.

Alas, this long overdue shattering of the BGLTQ ceiling was marred by the Harvard Crimson’s grossly insensitive coverage:

An earlier version of this article used the pronoun “she” to refer to Vanidy “Van” Bailey, the newly appointed director of bisexual, gay, lesbian, transgender, and queer student life. In fact, Bailey prefers not to be referred to by any gendered pronoun.

What does Vanidy prefer? It? That thing? Seriously, Vanidy IS a man or she, he, it is a woman right? Whatever Vanidy is, we know one thing for certain. Vanidy suffers from  a grossly over-inflated ego, if she expects us to change the English language to soothe her sensitivities. Maybe Vanidy has never been told that her feelings are not THAT important in the grand scheme of things? Maybe someone should pull her aside and say, Vanidy, get the Hell over yourself.

One more question, this term Bisexual, Gay, Lesbian, Transgender, and Queer bugs me. I thought Queer was a forbidden term. I also kind of thought it meant the same as Gay, so it is redundant isn’t it?

Because they are OBSESSED with LESBIANISM, that is why!

An odd title for a blog post perhaps, but Stacy asked a question, and I answered it

Melissa Etheridge’s Hideous Breakup

What? I’d missed this news: Evidently, the rock guitarist’s lesbian divorce turned nasty and Daily Beast columnist Tricia Romano decided to write about it in the context of “what does it mean for the gay rights movement?”

This is retarded: When Charlie Sheen got divorced, did anyone write about that in the context of “what does this mean for the cocaine-and-hookers lifestyle movement”? I think not. For some reason, when two lesbians break up, that’s about political rights, whereas when Charlie Sheen breaks up with somebody . . . . Well, if he accuses the hooker of stealing his watch, nobody really views Charlie as a victim of discrimination or anything, you see.

As I see it, the Left is obsessed with placing labels on everyone. They take people, and make them think that EVERYTHING that happens to them is a direct result of their skin color/religion/gender/sexual preference. The Left has played this identity politics game for decades now. Generally, the Left has been all too effective in embittering Blacks, Hispanics, women, Gays, Lesbians, and any other demographic they can come up with. This is all about keeping these groups voting Democrat.


I have worked with a few people who have fallen into this trap. EVERYTHING bad that happens to them is because they are a Lesbian, or Black, or a woman, or an atheist, blah, blah, blah.

So, of course, the Etheridge divorce MUST be about Lesbianism. At least in the minds of the Left.

The Science of Hot Lesbians

Stacy McCain, who is neither a scientist, nor a Lesbian posts about some science that has piqued his interest.

Denial can be a powerful defense mechanism. Apparently, homophobia is too — at least according to a new study from researchers from the University of Rochester, the University of Essex, England, and the University of California in Santa Barbara.

Their research concluded that the intense fear and repulsion college-age homophobes feel toward gays and lesbians is likely due to the fact that they see similarities in themselves.

“Individuals who identify as straight but in psychological tests show a strong attraction to the same sex may be threatened by gays and lesbians because homosexuals remind them of similar tendencies within themselves,” said lead author Netta Weinstein of the University of Essex, according to Science Daily.

Interesting, of course it is true that some people do over compensate.Your anti-porn zealot who secretly plays choke the chicken in front of their PC every night. Or the prohibitionist who battles against alcoholism. Of course,this study might be outcome based , so who knows how accurate it is. But, I am very interested to find that Stacy McCain is interested in a scientific study that has lots of merit.

For many years, I’ve been working on a scientific study to confirm my hypothesis that some lesbians — the really hot ones — are in fact secretly bisexual and eager to have me join them for a threesome.

Now THAT is science I would love to delve into! Strictly for the science of course. Because science is important!

Well, now Donald Douglas has gone and done it!

In one very short blog post title, Douglas might have offended most of the people on earth! And I am darned proud of him. Here, is that title, and be warned you too might be offended by it!

African Indigents with Massive Erect Cocks?
Click the link to see what Douglas is talking about, and trust me, it is an excellent post exposing the inanity of the race-obsessed Left. But, let us consider the incredible outbreak of Offendeditis this will surely cause
It will offend, of course the race pimps, and all those who suffer from Racial Obsession Syndrome
It will outrage Feminuts, because, well men with erections deeply offend Feminuts for two reasons. A man with an erection is likely thinking about a Hooters waitress, a cheerleader, or maybe a woman in a bikini, and a man finding women attractive or sexy is “degrading” to women according to Feminist theology. The other reason that Feminuts will be offended is that most Feminuts are either too ugly, or to damned mean or in most cases both, to give a man an erection.
It will offend Leftists who always defend thugs and rioters as “victims of Capitalism and Western society”
It will offend those who freak out every time they see a naughty word, and that is good because those types only seem happy when they are offended by something they saw on TV, or read in a magazine, or at a blog. It will offend them so much that they might actually stop begging the FCC to police what their neighbors are watching, which would be a good thing.
It will offend Lesbians, and I doubt I really need to explain why
It will offend every host at MSNBS, who will somehow blame the Tea Party, and Secessionists, because hosts at MSNBS get paid way too much to be offended.
Lastly, Douglas’ post will offend Andrew Sullivan when he finds out there are actually no “massive erections” in the post itself
Of course, I am sure I have offended many people in this post, and I truly hope I did, because, as I have stated before, it seems that these types are only happy when they are offended.