Huffington Post writer does not like domestic abuse record of Floyd Mayweather, but thinks Manny Pacquiao is icky for being pro-life

Moral Confusion anyone?

On Saturday night, Floyd Mayweather and Manny Pacquiao will finally face off in what’s been dubbed, “The Fight of the Century.”

It will be a record-breaking fight in terms of its purse, Pay-Per-View costs and, presumably, viewership. However, its also generated intense criticism of Mayweather due to his atrocious and horrifying record of violence against women, which stands without any punishment or suspension from the sport.

Make no mistake, it is a despicable record, filled with convictions, court appearances and jail time, which has led some to support Pacquiao, who has been lifted up as something of the “good guy” in the fight. Pacquiao’s trainer, Freddie Roach, said he sees the fight as “good against evil,” noting that the boxer’s hatred for domestic violence is serving as a driving force.

Watching the weigh in yesterday, I noted that while Mayweather stared and glared at Pacquiao during the “stare down” Pacquiao, on the other hand, had a knowing smile, a smile that to me said a lot. It said the Manny WANTS this fight, and would fight to free, while Mayweather, who has been ducking this clash for years, is all about the massive pay day the fight will bring. It also tells me Pacquiao has no respect for Mayweather BECAUSE of Mayweathers’ abuse of women. So, it ought to be easy to pull for Pacquiao right? NAW! Not for the Liberals

But even after considering all that, to root for team Pac-Man for any sort of pro-woman reasons wouldn’t be justified either.

Most of the commentary leading up to the fight has been about boycotts and distastesurrounding Mayweather’s actions, rather than full-throated support for Pacquiao. But if we’re going to question whether someone can dislike Mayweather because of his treatment of women, should we not also do the same of Pacquiao and his politics?

“Manny is really against domestic violence,” Roach has said. “It is a big issue maybe in the Philippines for him and being a congressman he can control some of that stuff.”

He is right about one thing: Pacquiao does have a role in Philippine legislation, but many of his past stances are worth a second look.

For one, after Pacquiao was elected to the Philippine congress in 2010, he opposed a bill that would increase the government funding for contraception and family planning services, according to USA Today in 2011. The boxer is also adamantly against abortion, which is illegal in the Philippine Constitution:

Ah, yes men beating women is bad, really bad, BUT being pro-life? Just as bad!

I might as well, make a pick for the fight. It would seem to me that these are two great fighters, dominant fighters. But, again, Manny WANTS this fight, you could tell how badly he wants this on his face yesterday. To me, no boxing expert, that spells trouble for the woman beater!

Can you spot the hypocrisy?

OK, I will give you a story, and you see if you can spot the hypocrisy Here we go

The owner of The Grove, Rick Caruso, tweeted that iconic boxing great and Philippines Congressman Manny Pacquiao would not be allowed “on the premises” thanks to Pacquiao’s outspoken opposition to same-sex marriage. “Boxer Manny Pacquiao is not welcome @TheGroveLA,” he tweeted. “@TheGroveLA is a gathering place for all Angelenos, not a place for intolerance.” Pacquiao was supposed to do an interview today with “Extra” at The Grove.

Did you spot that kids? Yep, I bet you did! The Grove’s owner has no room for intolerance, so, he is banning someone who has a different view-point! I wonder if their own hypocrisy ever slaps these Lefties in the face? But, I doubt it would do any good anyway. As I say, Liberalism is an ideology of convenience, not consistency. And if you disagree, well then you will not be included in the Liberal inclusion party, which is welcome to everyone, except those who do not march to the Liberal drumbeat!