Via Weasel Zippers has the screenshot to end all debate I think.
And to think some people actually think this woman is just an air head
Via Weasel Zippers has the screenshot to end all debate I think.
And to think some people actually think this woman is just an air head
Charlotte and Harriet Childress have penned an article for the Washington Post that is so bad, so devoid of anything even approaching intelligent, that it makes columns by David Frum and David Brooks seem worthwhile. This screed is so bad that Meghan McCain would mock it. Here are some lowlights, as in very dim bulbs
White men have much to discuss about mass shootings
Imagine if African-American men and boys were committing mass shootings month after month, year after year. Articles and interviews would flood the media, and we’d have political debates demanding that African-Americans be “held accountable.”
Have these two ladies ever heard of Chicago? Black men and boys are slaughtering people, mainly other Black men and boys in Chicago. NO, most of the shootings are not “mass shootings” but the death toll is in the “mass” hundreds annually. And, the politicians, which these two nimrods think would be demanding accountability are silent. In fact most of the blame for “gun deaths” because being shot is somehow worse than being strangled or stabbed to death from politicians and the media is on law-abiding gun owners. Good grief, these two numb skulls disprove their entire theory in the first paragraph! No wonder the Washington Post could not wait to run it!
Oh and it gets worser and worser as these two buffoons keep digging in the Eternal Pit of Liberal Stupidity
If life were equitable, white male gun-rights advocates would face some serious questions to assess their degree of credibility and objectivity. We would expect them to explain:
What facets of white male culture create so many mass shootings?
So many? Seriously? There very, very few mass shootings in America. Of course the media sensationalizes them, and they are horrific but very rare. Far more common are Americans defending themselves with firearms, sorry I do not know the breakdown along racial lines, skin color is unimportant to me
Why are so many white men and boys producing and entertaining themselves with violent video games and other media?
Why do so many White men play violent video games? Well, because they are fun, certainly more fun than sloshing our way through the incoherent ramblings of the Childress sisters. Of course, to be fair, sawing your own thumbs off is likely more fun than reading what these two write.
Why do white men buy, sell and manufacture guns for profit; attend gun shows; and demonstrate for unrestricted gun access disproportionately more than people of other ethnicities or races?
Because there is a long tradition of gun ownership and self-defense here in America. Of course many women and many minorities also honor these traditions, and many White men oppose them, but the Childress Sisters of the Traveling Stupidity are too obsessed with skin color to note that obvious fact. Just yesterday, at the gun range, I was shooting next to two folks qualifying for the CHL’s. One was a young Black woman. Being a man, and therefore a sexist, just ask any Feminut, I noted that she was quite pretty. Two things stopped me from asking her out. First was that she is likely 15- 2o years younger than me. The second thing was that she is a better shot than me. And at some point I would likely make her angry, so….. I kid of course. I never feel threatened at the range. The young woman was entirely comfortable as well. Imagine that, a White man A.K.A. The Source of All Evil according to the Childress sisters, flirting with a black woman at a gun range! I am sure the Childress sisters’ heads would explode!
Why are white male congressmen leading the fight against gun control?
Hmmm, Like Ted Cruz? Tim Scott? Marsha Blackburn? You can bet that Allen West would be fighting against this too, as would Mia Love, if they had been elected last November. The glaring fact is that MOST of Congress are White men, and MOST of those fighting FOR gun control are White men too!
I guess that escaped the minds of the sisters too? Well of course
it did they are college faculty!
Harriet and Charlotte are consultants, authors, and college faculty who have researched, written, and spoken about issues related to social and political change for more than two decades. They have presented their work in person to thousands of people through more than fifty seminars or speeches in ten states. Charlotte and Harriet have published two books and eighteen articles.
Collectively, Charlotte and Harriet have:
• Earned eight college degrees, including one Ph.D. and four master’s degrees.
• Taught college for forty years: pharmacy, engineering, math, physics, chemistry.
• Received close to a million dollars in grants from the National Science Foundation to research math, science,
technology, and engineering education.
• Worked eleven years in R&D and manufacturing in Fortune 500 companies and NASA.
Charlotte and Harriet are identical twins who live near each other in Oregon. They are active in their communities, serving on boards of public and historic parks, schools, and neighborhood and community organizations. They enjoy long walks, camping, commuting by bicycle/walking/bus, organic gardening, cycling, dancing, reading, needlework, backpacking, and cuddling with beloved cats and dogs.
And, as children they fell out of the Stupid Tree, hitting every branch on the way down apparently! These two women are obviously highly educated, yet seem to be completely devoid of any common sense. Their “expertise” seems to be in engineering, math, physics, and chemistry. It certainly is not in the subject they are writing about here. Instead they feel, rather than think their way through what they write in the Post. It is like I say, they are educated beyond their hat size
I hate reality TV. To me it is basically scripted, staged, stupid and mind numbing, and tends to feature some of the least likable people. Which of course makes reality TV a great place for America’s most clueless Republican, Meghan McCain. As Zip at Weasel Zippers wonders
What kind of deranged psychopath would watch a reality show based around McRINO’s talentless hack offspring?
Well, this is where we are isn’t it? Talent? Intellect? Who wants those? America apparently craves people who are related to famous people to people who actually have something of value to share.
So, what kind of show will this be? What can viewers expect?
McCain’s show, “Raising McCain,” will follow her as she hits the road interviewing both experts and average Joe’s alike. So far the network has ordered 10 half-hour episodes that will begin airing on August 1.
Participant Media, which owns pivot, created the channel as a way to reach out to Millennials. Pivot will air a mix of narrative films, documentaries, comedies and dramas, including a show co-hosted by actor Joseph Gordon-Levitt of “3rd Rock from the Sun” fame. So far, the network plans to have a reach of 40 million cable subscribers when it launches in August. The network also plans to run a broadband-only feed of the channel for a monthly fee.
“We’re told … that young people can’t have news because we’re just tweeting all the time, and that’s just bullsh**,” McCain said during the presentation for the launch of Pilot TV.
Oh, I cannot wait. But, of course, there is some good news here. Think of McCain’s show as yet another Tree of Low-Hanging Blogging Fruit. The inanities expressed on this show are bound to produce bushels of clips to share, and yes, mock right here.
Remember this woman KNOWS, well, I am sure she knows something
Meghan McCain thinks President Obama deserves at least a “small emoticon of privacy.” She said as much Monday in a morning MSNBC appearance:
Meghan, Meghan, Meghan. Do not worry about that gaffe, it happens to everyone. And it certainly does not mean you are stupid, or anything like that! Lots of other things you have said might mean you are not the brightest bulb, but I am giving you your own emoticon of credit!
On one, as Stacy describes him, Paul “Dreamy Eyes” Ryan
The next polls you see out of Virginia . . . Well, look, the “gender gap” will evaporate instantly now that Paul Ryan’s on the ticket. Trust me on this — chicks dig him. It was like Sinatra with a crowd of bobby soxers at the Paramount in 1944. Elvis at the Overton Park bandshell in Memphis in 1956. Total swoonsville. As I explained it on Twitter:
Lots more at the link. I wonder how many women will be swayed by Ryan’s looks, which women, and Stacy McCain tell me are “dreamy”. Of course, I cannot not rag on Stacy too much. He might be lost in Ryan’s eyes, but Trog is blogging about Ryan shirtless! NTTIAWWT
Leave it to Stacy McCain to, “uncover” this story about the Big-Breasted Bandit, and NO, she is not Stacy’s cousin Meghan “Look at My Massive Melons” McCain either. In fact Meghan’s Melons could not be reached for comment
Charged with possession of dangerous weapons:
After five days at large, Tonee Walker faced Southport Magistrates Court yesterday charged with armed robbery and stealing.
The 22-year-old blonde had been wanted for the hold-up of an Arundel service station early last Monday morning.
Her low-cut top, exposing an ample bosom, saw her dubbed the “buxom bandit.”
Sources say the suspect was arrested on the basis of “two major tips” received by Australian police after they circulated this wanted poster:
I wrote briefly about Meghan McCain whining about people being “mean to her” last night but, I took it easy on Meghan, who I think is likely a sweet girl who is very naive. My take is simple, Meghan is being used by the media types who let her hang around because she is “their type of Republican”. In short, Meghan says what the Left WANTS a “Republican” to say about other Republicans, so they tolerate her. Stacy McCain, on the other hand takes his “cousin” to the woodshed
Let’s start here: In what sense, Cousin, are you a Republican?
Because I’m trying to think of any recent occasion in which you have actually done anything to help the Republican Party.
Nothing immediately comes to mind.
Instead, you go on TV (and write columns of insipid nonsense for Tina Brown) denouncing Republicans and conservatives as extremists.
Michelle Malkin — extreme!
Andrew Breitbart — extreme!
In fact, I think your resentment toward them is not a matter of issues or ideology, but simply the fact that the “extremists” you denounce are actually more popular than you.
You seem to be under the delusion that you are entitled to demand respect from the honest people you insult, simply because your family is rich and your father is a senator. You are a stereotype of the spoiled little rich girl who can’t understand why people don’t automatically kowtow to her whims.
So while you’re whining about people calling you a “fat pig” on Twitter, other people are actually dealing with far more serious forms of harassment and intimidation. Yet I don’t seem to recall you saying one word about the plight of Aaron Worthing, and you were notably MIA on “Everybody Blog About Brett Kimberlin Day.”
Your selfishness is the root of your problems, and if you had any valuable skill or talent, I’d say you were impairing your usefulness by your ill-considered antics. As it is, you’re just another obnoxious D-List celebrity bimbo, and they’re a dime a dozen.
I must say, the envy angle is likely right on target. All of us deal with envy, some bloggers, OK LOTS of bloggers are more popular than me. Of course there are many more that are not as popular than me, so I guess that evens out. The fact is that sometimes I scratch my head as to why some of the bigger bloggers are more popular than me. Some I understand, some not so much. But, Meghan, you are on TV, OK you are on MSNBS, the public access network of the mainstream media, but I digress, even though you have nothing substantive to offer. So, really, you have no reason to be jealous of Michelle Malkin, or of Breitbart or their popularity. Grow up Meghan!
Meghan, you are a naive child. You are nothing but a useful idiot to the vultures at MSNBS. You are “their kind of Republican” Meghan. And you will be, as long as you keep saying what they WANT you to say! So, Meghan, grow up and stop whining. If you cannot take criticism, stop commenting on issues. By the way Meghan, I did not think, in this instance you deserved the level of criticism you received, but that is life Meghan.
Just watch MSNBS. Seriously, consider the clip Hot Air has of Lawrence O’Donnell calling the Romney’s “out of touch” because her shirt costs $990.The funny part is that when Meghan McCain actually points out to Lawrence that Michelle Obama wears $600 tennis shoes, O’Donnell shoots back that the shoes really only cost $450. yeah, that is “in touch” Lawrence!
Of course, this type of class warfare garbage is all the Left has. They cannot talk about any substantive issue. AllahPundit gets it right
When you can’t talk about $5 trillion in new debt, talk about a $990 shirt that the candidate’s wife bought with her own money. When you can’t talk about unemployment dropping below eight percent, talk about car elevators. If this economy ends up in a double dip, we may well see an “all Seamus, all the time” format on MSNBC for the month of October. Can’t wait for Martin Bashir’s dramatic eulogy for Man’s Best Friend on Election Day eve.
Just kidding, blogging is good, although not ALL blogs, or bloggers are good, or worth your time. But, in general, I welcome new bloggers. And so, Bristol Palin is now blogging, as Smitty and Bob Belvedere note today. Smitty also notes that Palin is now more relevant than a certain other “blogger” you know,the one with the Massive Melons
And, instantly, becomes more important than “warmly conformly” Meghan McCain. See, Meghan: if you show some moral courage, despite life’s adversities, you too could eventually be worthy of respect.
Meghan McCain, of course might grow up enough one day to realize that she is not as “hip”as she thinks. Sure, the media fawns over her now.She says what the media wants her to say about Republicans. In other words, Meghan bashes Republicans while claiming to be one. Naturally, if Meghan ever dares to praise Conservatives, the media will turn on her. But, she is simply too naive to understand that.
As to Bristol Palin, one of her first posts covered the Left’s Selective Outrage Syndrome over women’s issues.
Dear President Obama,
You don’t know my telephone number, but I hope your staff is busy trying to find it. Ever since you called Sandra Fluke after Rush Limbaugh called her a slut, I figured I might be next. You explained to reporters you called her because you were thinking of your two daughters, Malia and Sasha. After all, you didn’t want them to think it was okay for men to treat them that way:
“One of the things I want them to do as they get older is engage in issues they care about, even ones I may not agree with them on,” you said. “I want them to be able to speak their mind in a civil and thoughtful way. And I don’t want them attacked or called horrible names because they’re being good citizens.”
And I totally agree your kids should be able to speak their minds and engage the culture. I look forward to seeing what good things Malia and Sasha end up doing with their lives.
But here’s why I’m a little surprised my phone hasn’t rung. Your $1,000,000 donor Bill Maher has said reprehensible things about my family. He’s made fun of my brother because of his Down’s Syndrome. He’s said I was “f—-d so hard a baby fell out.” (In a classy move, he did this while his producers put up the cover of my book, which tells about the forgiveness and redemption I’ve found in God after my past – very public — mistakes.)
If Maher talked about Malia and Sasha that way, you’d return his dirty money and the Secret Service would probably have to restrain you. After all, I’ve always felt you understood my plight more than most because your mom was a teenager. That’s why you stood up for me when you were campaigning against Sen. McCain and my mom — you said vicious attacks on me should be off limits.
Yet I wonder if the Presidency has changed you. Now that you’re in office, it seems you’re only willing to defend certain women. You’re only willing to take a moral stand when you know your liberal supporters will stand behind you.
Of course,that was the 2008 campaigning Obama. Trying to paint himself as a uniter,and non-partisan. That,of course,was all a facade, as I am sure Bristol Palin knows.
Good job, Bristol, and welcome
Who could it be? Here is a hint, she is a “Republican” and, is like, way cool and hip. YEP! Meghan McCain is the newest airhead on the no ratings network! And she is mad at Newt!
On his Wednesday program, MSNBC host Thomas Roberts introduced McCain and asked her to address her back-and-forth with presidential candidate and former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich.
“Can you believe that?” McCain asked. “Former Speaker of the House I’m getting in fights with, I can’t believe it.”
In a specific incident addressing some remarks McCain made about his presidential bid, Gingrich said, “How would she have a clue?”
“I think he’s delusional,” McCain said. “And him calling me clueless I think is so sexist and disgusting and lame and a really offhanded remark … that he’s making towards me. And I think it’s ridiculous. Any polls that he’s reading, if you were seriously running for president, you wouldn’t be taking vacations to Greece during the middle of your campaign trail. I think he has a lot of other issues that all of us are very well aware of. And I would bet my career he’s not going to be our next nominee.”
She would bet her CAREER? What career Meghan? A gig on MSNBS? that is not a career Meghan, that is just a step up from being passed out on a bar stool. And Meghan, I hope you understand that the ONLY reason that MSNBS hired you is because you are stupid enough to say what they WANT YOU TO SAY ABOUT REPUBLICANS! You are their useful idiot Meghan!
Much of Sarah Palin’s allure seems to fade by each passing talking point of Michele Bachmann’s that goes viral. And with each passing day, Sarah Palin looks more and more like a confused woman who can’t decide which way to go. The last thing our country needs right now is a president who can’t make up her mind or make tough decisions. As Americans, we live in perilous times and what we need is real leadership. Republicans really have a chance to win the White House in 2012. We don’t need to be distracted by Sarah Palin’s attention-seeking antics anymore, unless of course she actually decides to stop flirting and finally make a move to announce her candidacy.
The media LOVES then some Moderates. Moderates, of course, are folks who possess neither the brain nor the spine to really stand for anything, Stacy McCain notes the latest “Moderates rising” non-sense from the media.
Few things are more predictable than this: Whenever Republicans are on the upswing — whenever conservatives are on fire with enthusiasm, proclaiming their core principles and clearly on the winning side of important issues — the mainstream media will devote enormous coverage to an alleged groundswell of discontented moderates whose demands for “bipartisanship” and “civility” are accompanied by condemnation of “divisiveness” and complaints that “extremists” are ignoring the vast majority of independent “centrist” voters.
Let the reader note that we never heard any such complaints about “divisiveness” and “extremism” after Obama was elected and Democrats were ramming their partisan agenda through Congress.
How very true it sort of like the “Republican party is not a BIG TENT PARTY” BS the Meghan McCain wing of the party spews. And now, from that wing of the party comes the latest in stupidity!
On Dec. 13, more than 1,000 citizens from the 50 states will convene in New York to change the odds. They are founding a movement – No Labels. Among them will be Democrats, Republicans and independents who are proud of their political affiliations and have no intention of abandoning them. A single concern brings them together: the hyper-polarization of our politics that thwarts an adult conversation about our common future. A single goal unites them: to expand the space within which citizens and elected officials can conduct that conversation without fear of social or political retribution.
Oh no, not a DINO/RINO hookup, what sort of bastard child would a coupling of those two bring forth? One with no principles, no spine, no fortitude, and no clue. Im\n other words a beast quite similar to one David Brooks! Stacy explains
The purpose of No Labels, of course, is to give the most irredeemably stupid “independent” voters an excuse to keep voting for Democrats. The mere fact that “No Labels” gets an 808-word free advertisement on the op-ed page of the Washington Post should tell you all you need to know about this alleged movement: It’s a ginned-up Establishment scam with no real activist constituency. Erick Erickson summarizes yesterday’s No Label summit:
Only in a place like New York, where a man can set off a bomb in Times Square and have the mayor blame opponents of Obamacare, could an unserious circle of smug, self-righteous political exiles get together and demand that they be treated seriously — so long as we give them no labels.
Stacy also gives us a peek at whom is involved in the No
Labels Principles orgy of moral cowardice!
All you need to do to understand what No Labels is about is to look at the list of speakers for yesterday’s big coming-out party. An organization whose manifesto was co-authored by David Frum, and which manages to get both David Brooks and David Gergen at its inaugural event — well, suffice it to say this probably isn’t the kind of “Army of Davids” Professor Reynolds had in mind.This isn’t a “movement.” That would require not only an identifiable activist constituency but also some clear sense of where it is they intend to “move.”
No, this is inertia. This is status quo-ism, a panic reaction to a populist insurgency, a desperate bid for relevance by an establishmentarian elite flying a false flag of bipartisanship, since their bogus “movement” is actually bipartisan in name only:
[T]he only Republicans present at Columbia University’s modern, square Alfred Lerner Hall seemed to be those who had recently lost primary races, such as South Carolina Rep. Bob Inglis and Delaware Rep. Mike Castle, or former Republicans like Florida Gov. Charlie Crist and New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg. No other senior elected Republican officials were in attendance, though a range of Democrats were present, some of them seeming a bit mystified by the bipartisan cast of the event . . .
MUCH, much more at the link. Stacy McCain dissects this “movement” and finds, well, head over and find out what abomination lies behind this scam that only a used car salesman or a televangelist could love!
We always hear the media, and Democrats, and certain Republicans (David Brooks, Meghan McCain both come to mind), talk about the need for the GOP to be a BIG TENT PARTY! Well, it has always been my contention that the GOP is a much “bigger” tent than the Democrats do, and the post-election meltdown of the Democrats seems to prove me correct, as this story shows, the Democrats are now demanding unconditional loyalty to the Obamassiah!
Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D-Mo.) warned Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) of “disloyalty” to President Obama if she should seek to distance herself from the White House in her re-election campaign.
Cleaver, who’s seen as the likely next leader of the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC), cautioned the centrist senator of distancing herself from Obama, the way many endangered incumbents had done in the closing weeks of the 2012 election.
“Any attempt to extricate herself from him will be an act of disloyalty,” Cleaver told McClatchy in a piece profiling McCaskill’s re-election campaign. “She will not do that at all.”
Well, there is some tolerance for diversity for you! Typical of Liberal behavior, that veiled threat drips of the “you best know your place” attitude that permeates the Democratic Party!
Yep! That is right! I said it! Sorry, but some people have no class. Any bets on how long this marriage lasts?
And no, I am NOT going to make some cheap Meghan “Look at My Magnificent Melons” McCain comment! Although that would be easy. But, her beloved cousin might take offense, so…..
The punchline, although not at all funny, is right here! At the Other McCain, where Stacy defines “sexually active” in a whole new way
“Sexually active” = screwing around, putting out, humping, fornicating, doing everything in sight like Meghan McCain after her fourth margarita.
Hmmm, I wonder if Meghan McCain knows that I do make the best maragritas evah?
Sen. John McCain’s daughter — who writes online for The Daily Beast and will soon release a book about life as a Republican — lost it after getting stopped by security when she arrived at the White House Correspondents dinner Saturday. The problem? She had only two tickets, but brought two friends.
“The security guard sent her to talk to someone to sort out the situation, but Meghan got bratty and nastily told him, ‘We’ll just stand here then,’ like an insolent child,” our source said, adding that after dealing with the guard, “She muttered to her friends, ‘Does he even know who the f— I am?’ ”
An insider told us, “Those tickets were harder to get than gold dust and Meghan blatantly only had two and thought she didn’t have to follow the same rules as everyone else.”
The vocal McCain “was complaining about everything from the air-conditioning to the wait,” says our leak.
Now I ask, is that how the NEW IMPROVED GOP is going to act?
HEARTACHE! Of course, Meghan brings this type of smackdown on herself by constantly bashing Conservatives. So, Meghan, before you whine about being called a “dirty Moderate” remember that if you dish it out, you best be ready to take it.
Sorry, but that is what she is. She is being used and promoted by the media, and the Democrats because she is saying EXACTLY what they want “new Republicans” to say. She is ragging on the GOP, ragging on Conservatism, and advocating a GOP that would, if it followed her inane advice, become a party with no ideals, no standards and no chance at ever regaining political majorities.
In short, a Meghan McCain model GOP would be another wing of the Democratic Party. The differences between the two parties would effectively cease to matter at all. And that, naturally, would forever alienate the Conservative base from the GOP. Wanna take a wild guess how that would play in elections across America?