Eric Cantor: Poster Boy Of The Beltway GOP Crapweasels (Michelle Malkin)

Eric Cantor: Poster Boy Of The Beltway GOP Crapweasels – Michelle Malkin


Ooouuuch. My sides are still aching after last week’s comical announcement by GOP presidential candidate Jeb Bush that he had snagged the coveted endorsement of notorious electoral reject Eric Cantor, the former House majority leader kicked to the curb by disgusted voters in Virginia’s 2014 primary election.

Newsflash to GOP elites: Getting Cantor’s support is not like landing a prized marlin. It’s like hooking one of those hideous bottom-feeding blobfish named the world’s ugliest creature.

Inside the Beltway, The Washington Post reported, “Cantor remains well-liked and respected in the Virginia business community and among the Republican donor class in the commonwealth.”

But outside the Beltway, the failed Republican revolutionary-turned-Wall Street influence-peddler is a snortle-inducing spectacle on both sides of the political aisle.

In Cantor’s endorsement statement Thursday, he praised Bush as a “true conservative leader” who “can re-energize our nation and recapture our greatness.” That’s empty babble coming from the epitome of an out-of-touch, self-aggrandizing, revolving-door ruling class.

BushCantor share the same smug condescension toward Americans who believe in strict immigration enforcement and putting American workers first. Cantor fecklessly lied to voters during the campaign season about his position(s). He showered his district with anti-illegal immigration flyers that fraudulently portrayed him as standing up to President Obama on amnesty. But on Capitol Hill, he championed the DREAM Act for illegal alien students, huge H-1B visa increases to quench Big Tech’s appetite for cheap foreign tech workers, and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce/AFL-CIO’s collaboration on massive immigration expansions.

While Cantor lip-synced to the limited-government tea party message, he boogied in backrooms with his pork-barrel pals. He assailed Obama’s bloated stimulus and then celebrated the high-speed rail boondoggles in his state funded by it. As a celebrated “young gun” on the right, Cantor preached fiscal responsibility, while blowing nearly $170,000 on fancy steakhouse dinners across the country in his last year in office.

Like Bush (and Gang of Eight cheerleader Sen. Marco Rubio), Cantor was the beneficiary of – and water carrier for – generous Silicon Valley and Big Business contributors. Cantor’s biggest donors included New York financial conglomerates the Blackstone Group ($65,500) and Goldman Sachs ($26,000), and California tech company Oracle ($25,000).

By contrast, the biggest donors to Cantor’s successful challenger, libertarian economics professor Dave Brat, were Virginia couple Gerry and Karen Baugh of Baugh Auto Body ($5,400), Michigan writer and artist Louis McAlpin ($5,200), and retired Virginia couple Martha and Kenneth Schwenzer ($5,200).

One outside group, the American Chemistry Council, spent a whopping $300,000 on soft-money ads to protect Cantor – an amount that exceeded Brat’s entire campaign funding.

Likewise, while Bush fashions himself a champion of the American worker, he pompously pushes the Gang of Eight amnesty as the only “adult” plan in the room. While he poses as a champion of American parents, students and “school choice,” he trashes activist moms and zealously crusades for failed Fed Ed rackets and data-mining schemes masquerading as “higher standards.” And while he stumps for the ordinary American’s “right to rise” through conservative principles, he has parlayed his political career into a multimillion-dollar collection basket from liberal special interests and corporate cronies who fund his Common Core advocacy – including the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the GE Foundation, Bloomberg Philanthropies, Intel and Pearson Education.

BushCantor seem to think everyone else will suffer from Sudden Election Amnesia Syndrome and grant big-spending, open-borders Republicans blanket amnesty for their betrayals. But what Brat told voters in Virginia about Cantor goes for voters nationwide as Bush flounders. “Eric Cantor doesn’t represent you,” Brat bluntly warned. “He represents large corporations seeking a never-ending supply of cheap foreign labor. He doesn’t care about how this will affect your livelihood, your schools, your tax bills or your kids’ chances of finding a job.”

The disgraced seven-term representative from Virginia’s affluent 7th district, who turned his back on grassroots constituents in favor of cashing in on power, now promises to work closely with Bush “as they chart a course to the White House.”

Here’s to Cantor’s success in helping Jeb navigate his same path to loserdom. Bon voyage!



Michelle Malkin: The Left’s unbridled bigotry exposed

Give them Hell Michelle!

I have had enough of smug liberal elites wrapped in their “Celebrate Diversity” banners tearing down minority conservatives.

Look in the mirror, media and academia bigots. Your own reflexive racism and divisive rhetoric are poisoning public discourse. There’s nothing “progressive” about attacking the children and grandchildren of immigrants who proudly embrace an American identity.

We are not “self-hating.” You just hate what we believe.

The most recent grenade tossed by the jack-booted Enforcers of Ethnic Authenticity came from The Washington Post this week. The Beltway fish-wrapper hyped a 2,100-word investigation of GOP Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal with a condescending quote from Professor G. Pearson Cross, who sneered: “There’s not much Indian left in Bobby Jindal.”

Has pallid Professor Cross invented an ambient diagnostic test to measure sufficiently acceptable levels of ethnicity?

The Post quoted a grand total of one disgruntled Democratic donor who railed against Jindal for “forgetting” his “heritage” and his “roots.” But that was more than enough for the apartheid-lite adherents to heed the dog whistle immediately. The Post’s splashy attack on Jindal’s assimilationist ethic spawned a vile Twitter hashtag game: #BobbyJindalIsSoWhite.

Left-wing racists mocked his skin color, his kids and his decision to change his name from “Piyush” to “Bobby.” A New York Times digital editor, Shreeya Sinha, gleefully linked to a BBC compilation of “The best of #BobbyJindalisSoWhite.” NBC News gloated over tweets from liberal Indian-Americans who mocked the accomplished governor, Rhodes scholar and father of three as a “Jindian.

Great piece, go read it all. Michelle lays bare the bigotry, and hatred of the Left

The 25 Best Blogs Now

This is my list of the 25 most important blogs to follow right now, right now meaning in these times. These blogs are leading the charge against Obamacare, runaway government power grabs, entrenched politicians who care nothing about the Constitution, those who would take our guns, those who would impoverish us all in the name of fighting climate change, radical race baiters, and radical Feminists, and yes, the Islamization movement that would have us bow to Sharia Law. In short these are the 25 best blogs to read if you love America, our Constitution, and liberty! 

No, I did not include this blog, although I think it is right up there with those I did list.

As an aside, ALL the blogs on my blogroll rock, and deserve special mention for fighting for our founding principles, so no offense at all is intended to those not listed here. WE appreciate all they do

Click the links to check out what these blogs are covering

American Power

The Other McCain

Pirates Cove

Weasel Zippers

Camp of the Saints

Gateway Pundit


I Own the World

Theo Spark

The Right Scoop

Lonely Conservative

Conservative Hideout

Nice Deb


Bearing Arms

90 Miles From Tyranny

Blazing Cat Fur

Daniel Greenfield

Doug Powers

Intellectual Froglegs

Maggies Notebook

Legal Insurrection

American Perspective

Michelle Malkin

Protein Wisdom


The Best of the Blogs

In an effort to return to my link-a-round, and Rule 5 posts, I offer up this post, Best of the Blogs

Remember Samantha Fox? Fritz does

Blackmailers Don’t Shoot offers up yet another Liberal FAIL

The Lonely Conservative: Fire Obama voters first

1389 Blog: Why does as you to register to vote anyway?

90 Miles has a look at an armed rally at the Alamo

Act Well Your part quotes Madison

Donald Douglas has some Rule 5 linkage!

Bob Belvedere is as mad as Hell, and, well you know the rest

Soylent Siberia celebrates football, and cheerleaders!

PiratesCove has “If All You See” and Sunday Sorta Blogless Pin Up

Proof Positive has the Friday Night Babe and Judge Jeanine! AND the Best of the Web!

Randy has an award for Sgt. Schultz!

Woodsterman has a joke about boobs

Wine, Women, and Politics has Saturday Sweeties NSFW

Animal Magnetism has Rule 5 Friday

Postal Dog has a video by some band, with a hot chick in it

Knuckledraggin has your Good Morning Girl

Say Anything has a video that will explain just how ignorant of history we are

Reaganite Republican has the story of a former Obamabot that gets it now

Michelle Malkin has your homeland insecurity post

Wyblog: Why does Detroit hate old folks?

Doug Ross: How is that “free” health care working out for you Obamabots?

Theo has the Bed Time Totty and Mammo-Grahams

American Perspective looks at a real Halloween fright-Obama Care!

Rum Bear wonders if Obama Care will cover Cranial Rectalitis

Angry Mike Smokin’ Hot!

EBL has  Mischa Barton. then, and now

Hookers and Booze has the Hooker of the Week

Miss K has Saturday Night Hotties

Pitsnipes has Andressa Urach

Last Tradition has Valerie Mason

TheOther McCain has Rule 5 Sunday (last week) and this week and a look at two bastards that deserve a painful prison stay

Bearing Arms, why Stand Your Ground Laws are needed and also, gun control myths destroyed in five minutes

Big Hollywood: Oliver Stone is still a backasswards mouth breather!

Blazing Cat Fur: Those Palestinians Nazis are such kidders

Cordite has Blue Monday

Conservative Hideout: Rachel Maddow is the queen of doctored footage also see Sunday links!

Doug Powers: Oh MSNBS!

Gateway Pundit: 2000 bikers shut down Westboro Bastards!

Big Fur Hat: Yep, Kim Kardashian’s ass still has its own zip code

I’m 41 has a good Rush videeo

Intellectual Froglegs has Joe Dan’s latest video up

It Ain’t Holy Water has an eye execercise

Becca Lower: Oh My Achin Rubio!

Moonbattery has your Useless Leftist Hack of the day

Motor City Times: SPEED

Alex Jones goes off his meds, goes nuts

Actually, Jones has always been nuts, and there are likely no meds that can help this deranged loon. Here Donald Douglas smacks Jones for his nasty attacks on Alyssa Milano. Yes, as Douglas points out Milano is a Lib, but she is also a nice lady, and she does not deserve the vile attack Jones launched. What an ass clown!

Also read The Other McCain’s defense of the lovely Alyssa Milano

“War whore”? Alex Jones is a despicable conspiracy theorist who spent years pushing 9/11 Truther nonsense. At the 2008 Democratic National Convention in Denver, Alex Jones spotted Michelle Malkin at a protest and he started shouting “neocon” and a bunch of other stuff, which incited some protesters to start chanting, “Kill Michelle Malkin.”

If it hadn’t been for Charlie Martin and Jim Hoft being there to defend her, who knows what might have happened?

I’ve hated that dangerous kookball ever since, and the fact that Alex Jones is now smearing a liberal like Alyssa Milano (while, characteristically, ranting about the “New World Order”) goes to show just how little Alex Jones’s paranoid anger has to do with actual politics.

Alex Jones is worse than those idiot liberals who were raging because Alyssa Milano appeared on Fox and Friends this week.

If anybody needs rational arguments against the Syria intervention, I’ll be happy to provide them, but you’re not going to get any rational arguments from Alex Jones about anything.

And now, if you haven’t clicked ALYSSA MILANO SEX TAPE yet, go ahead and do it, and you can thank Alyssa Milano on Twitter.

I also love this tweet that sums up Alex Jones quite well

@michellemalkin is a nice conservative lady. @Alyssa_Milano is a nice liberal lady. @RealAlexJones is an obnoxious a–hole conspiracy kook.

Maybe a 12-step program could benefit Alex Jones. Assholes Anonymous perhaps?

Being a “atheist/ pacifist/environmentalist/libertarian socialist/consequentialist,” is no way to go through life son

Dylan Bleir is, as Stacy McCain notes, a typical lying Democrat

Oberlin College student Dylan Bleier identified himself as an “atheist/ pacifist/environmentalist/libertarian socialist/consequentialist,” which is to say he is a typical lying Democrat criminal:

One of the two students removed from Oberlin College earlier this year for allegedly circulating virulently racist, anti-Jewish and anti-gay messages around campus  is an ardent leftist and committed supporter of President Barack Obama, The Daily Caller News Foundation has learned.
Dylan Bleier, one of the two students, organized a voter registration drive on behalf of Obama before the 2008 election. That voter drive is still listed on the website for Organizing for Action, the non-profit group whose mission is to advance Obama’s agenda.
The Oberlin Police Department identified Bleier and his partner in the spree, Matt Alden, as two of the principal architects of a month-long spate of racist, anti-Jewish and anti-gay messages at the small, private campus.

Oh the Left LOVES stories like these, and the media? They cannot get enough, as it fits their “America is RAAAAACIST” mantra. But, what would the media, and the Left do if these “hate crimes” were fake, as many such incidents prove to be?

This would have been a hate crime if it had been true and it is twice as wrong because it was a damnable lie which, as Oberlin alumna Michelle Malkin makes clear, the administration was willing to accept as a pretext for more of their endless “diversity” indoctrinations. The usual suspects were part of the dishonest cover-up:

School officials and local police knew the identity of the culprits, who were responsible for most if not all of such incidents on campus, yet remained silent as the campus reacted as if the incidents were real.  . . .
The New York Times, among dozens of newspapers, covered the story, publishing photos of the protests. . . .
Melissa Harris-Perry was all over it, along with Ta-Nehisi Coates, using the Oberlin experience to draw larger points about racism . 

Babbling, race-obsessed idiots!

Oh, and the person in the “Klan robe” was actually just a woman in a blanket, but, MHP does not care about that.

Oh you just KNEW that Melissa Harris Perry, and her tampon earrings would be all over this. And if you are waiting for her to retract any statements she made, do not hold your breath. People like Perry are great at fanning divisive flames, but admitting they were wrong? Eh, not so much. In fact I would not be stunned at all if Leftist agitators like Perry continue to reference “Olberlin College” in the future. Leftists not only lie, but they repeat those lies, even after they have been proven false. Darleen Click explains “fake, but accurate”

The college’s administration knew early on this was a hoax and chose to remain silent. They deliberately fed into the Leftist narrative that America is more racist than ever.

Will there be any consequences for Oberlin’s despicable behavior?

Probably not, as “fake but accurate” is a guiding Leftist principle.

Just as morality is subjective among Leftists, so is the definition of truth. If it fits their agenda, it is true, even if it is completely fabricated!

Just one more example that when the Left says “by any means” they mean it!

Video double feature time

Twice the Blogging role Model, Twice the fun,

First Michelle destroys a Leftist gun control zealot.

I do wish Michelle had told this nitwit that it is ALREADY illegal for anyone under 21 to buy a handgun. But, it is hard when he would not shut his mouth for fear of facts being brought up. My question is this guy that stupid, or is he just preaching what has been programmed into his brain?

Next Michelle points out the racist motive of the Oklahoma murder, and the typical Leftist double standard



Chris Matthews ” I am NOT paranoid!”

Maybe not Crazy Legs, maybe not. But, you are a shameless, clueless political hack who has to pry your lips off Obama’s rear to speak.

Via Mediaite:

“But they first of all referred to him, not as the ‘President of the United States’ but as a ‘liberal leader.’ They refer to the health care act of 2010 as ‘a bill.’ They refer to him as ‘Obama.’ They don’t say the ‘the president.’ They don’t say the ‘a law.’ They don’t even speak the language we normally speak in civilized political debate. They’ve changed it so much that he’s actually not really supposed to be there, and I’m not paranoid.”

THIS is why I call MSNBS, I watch so you do not have to, the Tree of Low Hanging Blogging Fruit. Matthews says the most inane things, and his guests, who are just as big a morons as Matthews go along with him. The video at the link is a classic example of how far out in left field Matthews and his followers are. First, they play a clip of Donald Trump and use HIS words to bash Conservatives. Let us set this straight folks once and for all. Trump is NOT a Conservative. He is a carnival barker, a publicity whore, a Televangelist with worse hair, and a used car salesman in a better suit. Trump is a loathsome SOB, who apparently knows what to say to get on TV. Fox seems to love them some Donald for some reason. The first time I saw Trump, my BS Detector pegged! If you are getting the impression I would not piss on Trump if he was on fire, you are getting the right impression.

Sorry for the rant, really, but I have never been able to stomach Trump. If you want to hear a REAL, GENUINE, no BS Conservative, come down to Texas, and listen to our governor. Listen to Ted Cruz, Mike Lee, Michelle Malkin, Sarah Palin, Ted Nugent, or many of the bloggers like Ed and I, and those on our blogroll. Most of us are not after money, or fame, we do what we do on our time. On days off, after work, before work, and we do it because we CARE about America. But does Fox call us up? Do any big time radio talkers, who by the way talk about many things bloggers talked about a week before call us up? Hell, some of them do not even give credit for the blog they get the story from! Bet your ass Trump would do or say just about anything if there were $$$ attached, but for free? Yeah right! Maybe that is what riles me most. Folks who do it for publicity, fame, wealth, get the spotlight, usually saying the same damn things over and again while the bloggers like us, who are likely more insightful, and who bust our asses because we love America get squat!

Again, sorry for the rant. Hell I forgot what this post was supposed to be about now


Gator Doug’s Blogging Role Model, Michelle Malkin, Verbally Bitchslaps Al Sharpton (Video)

Michelle Malkin’s Must-See Takedown Of ‘Race Charlatan’ Al Sharpton: He ‘Has Blood On His Hands’ – The Blaze

Conservative firebrand Michelle Malkin went off on Al Sharpton on Wednesday’s “Hannity,” dismissing him as a “race charlatan” and “demagogue” who is known only for spreading “racial divisiveness and hate.”


“Al Sharpton has blood on his hands,” Malkin began. “He’s ruined lives. He’s been one of the worst purveyors of racial divisiveness and hate in my lifetime. How can you expect an ounce of honor from a man who doesn’t have it?”

She went on to call Sharpton a “shakedown artist” who hates “cops,” “whites,” “Jews” and “who has stoked his rent-a-mob to murder Yankel Rosenbaum, to destroy the life of Steven Pagones when he lied about Tawana Brawley.”

Malkin also warned conservatives not to get into the “snake pit” and attempt to have an honest discussion about race with people like Sharpton. She said conservatives have been far too “nice” thus far.

“You can’t with somebody who is a demagogue and is evil,” she added.


Later in the program, host Sean Hannity played a compilation of Sharpton’s most vitriolic and hateful moments, which Malkin described as “chilling.”

“In an era where we are supposed to take Martin Luther King’s words to heart about judging people by the content of their character, not the color of their skin, all this man has done is enrich himself by fomenting more racial division,” Malkin reacted.

She added that it’s amazing Sharpton, a “race charlatan,” thinks he “can lose weight, put pancake makeup on, and all of a sudden he’s respectable.”

Click HERE For Rest Of Story


Your Daley Gator Saturday Op-Ed Roundup Featuring John Hawkins, Mark Steyn, Stephen Hayes, Thomas Sowell, Michelle Malkin, Walter E. Williams And Jonah Goldberg

Everything You Need To Know About The Rubio/McCain Amnesty Catastrophe In 15 Quotes – John Hawkins


1) This is President Obama’s number one political agenda item because he knows we will never again have a Republican president, ever, if amnesty goes into effect. We will perpetually have a progressive, liberal president, probably a Democrat, and we will probably see the House of Representatives go into Democrat hands and the Senate will stay in Democrat hands. – Michele Bachmann

2) The bill is worse than universal healthcare. Listen to me, it is worse than universal healthcare, and in the coming days as we get closer, we will explain why it’s worse than universal healthcare. It is the death knell of the country, there is no recovery from this one. None. No recovery. – Glenn Beck

3) If Republicans are opposed to what mass immigration is doing to the country demographically, ethnically, socially and politically, there are, as Reagan used to say, “simple answers, just no easy answers.”

Those answers: No amnesty, secure the border, enforce laws against businesses that hire illegals, and impose a moratorium on new immigration so wages can rise and immigrants enter the middle class and start voting as did the children and grandchildren of the immigrants of 1890-1920 by 1972.

So what are the Republicans doing?

Going back on their word, dishonoring their platform, and enraging their loyal supporters, who gave Mitt 90 percent of his votes, to pander to a segment of the electorate that gave Mitt less than 5 percent of his total votes.

Whom the gods would destroy they first make mad. – Pat Buchanan

4) The nation’s plutocrats are lined up with the Democratic Party in a short-term bid to get themselves cheap labor (subsidized by the rest of us), which will give the Democratic Party a permanent majority. If Rubio’s amnesty goes through, the Republican Party is finished. It will be the “Nancy Pelosi Democratic Party” versus the “Chuck Schumer Republican Party.” – Ann Coulter

5) Instead of cracking down on the Administration’s abuse of power, S. 744 places unprecedented new restrictions on interior enforcement – making the current situation much worse and much more hazardous. It is as if S. 744 were explicitly written to handcuff law enforcement officials – binding their hands while giving virtually unchecked authority to executive branch officials to prevent future removals, including removals of criminal aliens. – ICE Council president Chris Crane

6) It doesn’t stop illegal immigration. If anything it makes the problem worse by not securing the border and by incentivizing future illegal immigration. – Ted Cruz

7) Creating more than 30 million new immigrants, including 11 million former illegals, and supplanting their numbers with another 20-odd million guest workers is from a sociological and demographic point of view quite radical: 30 million is roughly a tenth of the current population of the United States. How we handle immigration is of fundamental importance to questions ranging from national security to economic growth to the character of our nation itself. That we cannot get a couple of small-time performance benchmarks written into the bill suggests that this issue is not being treated with the intelligence and the prudence it deserves. – The Editors at National Review

8) This is the administration that has refused to enforce the law… they have created new law out of nothing. They’ve violated the law in a number of ways. And our guys are counting on the administration to all of a sudden actually keep their word on something like securing the border when they’ve never done it before and they believe it’s in their political interest to continue not to secure the border even if there’s a deal? I mean that’s crazy to think they’re going to start securing the border and until we secure the border everything else is completely meaningless. – Louie Gohmert

9) Should this be grounds to primary challenge every Republican who voted for this bill, and I mean every single one? I don’t care if they just got re-elected. Next time they’re up for re-election. Ann Coulter’s right. This is a single issue – this is a single-issue primary challenge. You know why? Because this is it. As Bill Kristol said on this show, as he said on this show, once you give this pathway to citizenship all these benefits, all this discretion to [Janet] Napolitano, it’s over. It’s too late to complain about it. It’s over. – Laura Ingraham

10) The federal judge in Crane v. Napolitano has ruled that the ICE agents are likely to prevail in their argument that the Obama administration is ordering them to violate federal law. Think about that: This administration is ordering career law enforcement personnel to break the law. Now, the administration is pushing for an amnesty bill that contains almost nothing to improve immigration enforcement. All that the American citizens will get in return for the amnesty is the promise from the Obama administration that they will try harder to enforce the law. The administration has already shattered that promise, doing exactly the opposite. This is a stark warning to Congress. I sincerely hope that they hear it. – Kris Kobach

11) Almost every requirement in this bill can be waived by Janet Napolitano: for instance, the time limits on when people can be legalized, the requirements on criminal activity or even the enforcement triggers. Those basically don’t mean anything if any of them is held up in court, still. …The litigation over the 1986 bill didn’t end until just a few years ago. The ACLU has been quite clear that it intends to sue to stop mandatory e-verify and probably sue to stop a bunch of other things. If, for instance, mandatory use of electronic verification is still in the courts 10 years after the bill passes, it’s entirely possible the Secretary of Homeland Security can just give everybody Green Cards on her own – and there are hundreds of other examples of that kind of discretion. It’s not too much of an exaggeration to say that this 1,000 page bill after all of the amendments could be boiled down to, “We trust you, Obama; just do the right thing.” – Mark Krikorian

12) The ‘Gang of Eight’ bill is not immigration reform. It is big government dysfunction. It is an immigration Obamacare. All advocates of true immigration reform – on the left and the right – should oppose it. – Mike Lee

13) Okay. So what does that mean, the republic is at stake? This is the ball game. I remember people saying that about Obamacare. Now they’re saying it about immigration reform. And they’re both right. In the case of immigration reform, it effectively wipes out the Republican Party. – Rush Limbaugh

14) Will they listen? Suicidal Republicans have supported illegal alien amnesties dating back to the Reagan era. They have paid a steep, lasting price. As bankrupt, multiculti-wracked California goes, so goes the nation. The progs’ plan has always been to exploit the massive population of illegal aliens to redraw the political map and secure a permanent ruling majority.

Now, in the wake of nonstop D.C. corruption eruptions, SchMcGRubio and Company want us to trust them with a thousand new pages of phony triggers, left-wing slush-fund spending and make-believe assimilation gestures. Trust them? Hell, no. There’s only one course for citizens who believe in upholding the Constitution and protecting the American dream: Stop them. – Michelle Malkin

15) On every major front, this legislation fails to deliver on its core promises. It delivers only for the special interest groups who helped write it. Should it pass, it would represent the ultimate triumph of the Washington elite over the everyday citizen to whom Congress properly owes its loyalty. – Jeff Sessions


More opinion articles:

Big Politically Correct Brother – Mark Steyn

Excerpt – Every time I go on his show, my radio pal Hugh Hewitt asks me why congressional Republicans aren’t doing more to insist that the GOP suicide note known as “the immigration deal” include a requirement for a border fence. I don’t like to tell Hugh that, if they ever get around to building the fence, it won’t be to keep the foreigners out but to keep you guys in.

I jest, but only very slightly and only because the government doesn’t build much of anything these days – except for that vast complex five times the size of the Capitol the NSA is throwing up in Utah to house everybody’s data on everything everyone’s ever done with anyone ever.

Click HERE For Rest Of Article


Our Disappearing President – Stephen Hayes

Excerpt – One might expect Keith Alexander to advocate on behalf of the two programs at the center of our national debate about terrorism and surveillance. He is, after all, the head of the National Security Agency, which runs them. “It’s dozens of terrorist events that these have helped prevent—both here and abroad-in disrupting or contributing to the disruption of terrorist attacks,” Alexander testified last week.

And it’s not entirely surprising that the four leading members of Congress on intelligence matters would argue on behalf of these programs, known as “215” and “702,” for the sections of the laws that authorize them.

Click HERE For Rest Of Article


Who ‘Needs’ Immigrant Labor? – Thomas Sowell

Excerpt – One of the most common arguments for allowing more immigration is that there is a “need” for foreign workers to do “jobs that Americans won’t do,” especially in agriculture.

One of my most vivid memories of the late Armen Alchian, an internationally renowned economist at UCLA, involved a lunch at which one of the younger members of the economics department got up to go get some more coffee. Being a considerate sort, the young man asked, “Does anyone else need more coffee?”

“Need?” Alchian said loudly, in a cutting tone that clearly conveyed his dismay and disgust at hearing an economist using such a word.

Click HERE For Rest Of Article


Barack Onama’s “Social Innovation” Slush Fund – Michelle Malkin

Excerpt – We all know now what the vengeful Obama IRS has been doing to conservative nonprofits the past four years: strangling them in the crib. But do you know how much pampering and largesse far-left welfare-state charities have received while limited-government groups suffered? You don’t know the half of it.

Before President Obama took office, I warned that Democrats planned to steer untold amounts of taxpayer dollars to his shady community-organizing pals. The Dems’ 2008 party platform proposed the creation of a “Social Investment Fund Network” to subsidize “social entrepreneurs and leading nonprofit organizations (that) are assisting schools, lifting families out of poverty, filling health care gaps and inspiring others to lead change in their own communities.”

Click HERE For Rest Of Article


Unasked And Unanswered Questions – Walter E. Williams

Excerpt – Grutter v. Bollinger was the landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the University of Michigan Law School’s racial admissions policy. Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, writing for the majority, said the U.S. Constitution “does not prohibit the Law School’s narrowly tailored use of race in admissions decisions to further a compelling interest in obtaining the educational benefits that flow from a diverse student body.” But what are the educational benefits of a diverse student body?

Intellectuals argue that diversity is necessary for academic excellence, but what’s the evidence? For example, Japan is a nation bereft of diversity in any activity. Close to 99 percent of its population is of one race. Whose students do you think have higher academic achievement – theirs or ours?

Click HERE For Rest Of Article


Freedom: The Unfolding Revolution – Jonah Goldberg

Excerpt – “Why are there no libertarian countries?”

In a much-discussed essay for Salon, Michael Lind asks: “If libertarians are correct in claiming that they understand how best to organize a modern society, how is it that not a single country in the world in the early twenty-first century is organized along libertarian lines?”

Such is the philosophical poverty of liberalism today that this stands as a profound question.

Definitions vary, but broadly speaking, libertarianism is the idea that people should be as free as possible from state coercion so long as they don’t harm anyone.

Click HERE For Rest Of Article


I think it is time Grover Norquist did some explaining

Bob Belvedere lays out some troubling facts

Michelle Malkin lays out the dots and connects them in a series of Tweets from this morning:

Hey, remember when I told young people at CPAC back in Marchto ask: “Who is Abdurahman Alamoudi?”==>…

— Michelle Malkin (@michellemalkin) April 24, 2013

Well, Norquist’s convicted jihadist pal Abdurahman Alamoudi is also founder of the Boston bombers’ radical mosque ==>…

— Michelle Malkin (@michellemalkin) April 24, 2013

Boston bombers’ mosque founder/convicted jihadist Abdurahman Alamoudi=friend/funder of Grover Norquist. Flashback==>…

— Michelle Malkin (@michellemalkin) April 24, 2013

#GOPproblems – Alamoudi pal Grover Norquist front & center at Gang of 8 amnesty press conference ==>…

— Michelle Malkin (@michellemalkin) April 24, 2013

Lie down with Jihadists, wake up with blood on your hands, eh, Grover?

Mrs. Malkin ends by asking a very important question:

Psst. The GOP has shameful terror ties to Boston bombers’ radical mosque. Will more conservatives finally speak up?=>…

— Michelle Malkin (@michellemalkin) April 24, 2013

Well Grover?


The despicable Left and their own definition of tolerance.

Via I’m a Man

According to Michelle Malkin at Twitchy and Sooper Mexican the spiteful and malicious left just can’t contain their glee that Rick Warren’s youngest son Matthew committed suicide.  Rick Warren’s crime?  He doesn’t affirm the gay lifestyle, so these compassionate and kindly leftists take to twitter in droves celebrating the grief that the Warren family must be feeling.   Their fondest fantasy seems to be that hopefully Matthew Warren is gay and therefore his death can be blamed directly on his ‘homophobic’ father.  There is no evidence that the younger Warren was homosexual, but why let that get in the way of a triumphant daydream?

More loathsome hatred here


Classless Publicity Whore Donald Trump Picks Twitter Fight with Real Conservative…….

And gets owned by The Blogging Role Model

So, the Vulgar King of Obnoxiousness decided to throw down on Twitter with Michelle Malkin, and perhaps this reminder is unnecessary:

Trump has a rather long history of hostility toward conservatives like Malkin, a New York Times bestselling author and New Media entrepreneur who created the popular Hot Air political blog as well as the innovative Twitter aggregation site Twitchy, as well as her own highly trafficked site, It is highly unlikely that she will back down in her battle with Trump.

Trump is a bully who is used to pushing people around and, unfortunately, some Republicans have been willing to enable his bullying. Quite frankly, he’s one of those celebrity characters — like Geraldo “El Spitto” Rivera — whom Fox News executives tolerate because they’re good for ratings. Also (and I think I’m not the only one who sees this) there’s a kind of old-boys attitude with Bill O’Reilly in particular: Geraldo and Trump are “one of the guys,” and so the brass at Fox are apt to indulge their hateful attitudes toward Malkin. But don’t for a minute think that Malkin is  going to put up with Trump’s bullying.

He is upset because Michelle calls him for being the phony he is. 



I could use a bit of Michelle Malkin this morning

I wrote about this story from New Jersey where CPS and the police showed up at the home of a man who gave his son a rifle Wednesday. Donald Douglas has Michelle on Hannity discussing the police state mentality of the Left, and their inane aversion to guns


Oh good grief, here we go again with the Gays at CPAC controversy

Donald Douglas has a piece, and video of Cliff Kincaid, who argues that there is no such thing as a Gay Conservative. You can go read the piece, and the links, the video of Kincaid is here

Sorry to Kincaid, who I really am not too familiar with, I know, shocking that someone might not know such a “legend”, but, what can I say. In the video, Kincaid makes his arguments, some of which I agree with, but, some of it is BS, again, sorry, I am not fond of beating around the bush. Yes, I agree, I want the Boy Scouts to be able to control who joins and who does not. They are a private group, and in America the right of a group to have its standards should be fundamental. Yes, there are Gay activists who are pushing hard for Leftist statutes, and to silence any speech they disagree with. Yes, we ought to fight against those tactics and activists.

Kincaid whines along with the fellow interviewing him, never heard of him either, in the video because some Conservatives are criticizing his piece on Twitchy, Michelle Malkin’s site that covers who is tweeting what. They sort of accuse Malkin of “bowing to pressure” and wonder how, oh how could a Malkin site ever dare allow criticism of Kincaid. Well, genius, Twitchy covers who is tweeting what, and from reading the tweets listed a lot of Conservatives disagree with you, I know, how dare they! They are probably all Gay cross dressers who wear real fur to Tea Party rallies, and cling to their guns.

My fault with Kincaid is that whatever legitimate points he has are lost when he says there is no such thing as a Gay Conservative. REALLY? You might want to tell this guy that because he damn sure acts like a Conservative, but, again, what do I know? Sorry Mr. Kincaid, but if someone is pro 2nd amendment, pro-life, for smaller government, lower taxes. fiscal sanity, and votes for Conservatives, they are CONSERVATIVE! If they hold those values they are CONSERVATIVE! Yes, you can be Gay, or an Atheist, or Left-handed or even a midget wrestler and still be Conservative Mr. Kincaid. See, I do not understand Homosexuality. I don’t. I mean how can a guy watch that Salma Hayek dance in that vampire movie and not have thoughts about, well, you know. I do not get that. I also do not know if Gay people are born Gay, or choose to be Gay, or become Gay from watching too many cartoons. I do not know, and I do not really give a flying damn. What they are is not my business, nor is it yours sir. 

As to Gay marriage, I would say let the states decide. Yes, Mr. Kincaid, that is Federalism, either you believe in it or not pick a side or shut up. I would also say let the federal government mandate that no states, nor Gay activists may sue other states to force that state to adopt or recognize Gay marriage. Or maybe the very best thing is to get the government out of marriage, I have never believed that taxes ought to be used to reward or punish certain behaviors. Really why should your marital status have any effect on your tax rate?

What I DO care about is this. People like you, who think they can judge someone’s Conservatism based on one aspect of their life agitate me. You agitate me because you make us all look like idiots. People who wish to have certain moral standards that every Conservative MUST AGREE ON really agitate me. Sorry Mr. Kincaid, but Conservatism is not a religion, although many Christians are Conservative in their political ideals. Sorry Mr. Kincaid, but you have a phobia, or a fetish, or something going on there. As a final point I wonder what other issues Mr. Kincaid would dismiss someone from being a Conservative over? Maybe my Daley Babe posts disqualifies me? Maybe all the work Ed and I put into this blog do not count because we like attractive women? Maybe I should check with Mr. Kincaid, who, apparently is the sole arbiter of who is and is not Conservative? Or maybe I should just chalk up Kincaid to being an ass hat? Yep, option B works for me.

Breaking News!! Dirty Little Communist Penguin still DEAD!

Michelle Malkin ain’t shedding any tears

While Michelle, and other regular Americans are disgusted by the Chavez worship, Chris Wysocki notes that some are truly heart broken

Via Republican Party Animals:

(AP) — The formal announcement by the Venezuelan government that Hugo Chavez has died sent shockwaves through the ranks of the Hollywood elite, who had long been the Venezuelan leader’s staunchest supporters. Throughout the day, celebrities struggled to cope with the devastating loss.

“Sean is devastated, completely inconsolable,” Sean Penn’s publicist Amy Glattensturmer told the AP. “He’s been in his bedroom all day. He won’t eat, he won’t berate his staff, he won’t punch women, he wouldn’t even come outside to look at the brand new Ferrari Enzo the studio sent him as incentive to read a script. He realizes that a true champion of the working class has died today, and, as one himself, Sean has taken the hit very hard.”

“The relationship between celebrities and their dictators is a very close one,” PR guru Benjamin Shaltzberg told the AP. “Hollywood celebrities had formed a huge bond with Chavez. It will be difficult to replace.”

Throughout Tuesday afternoon, cars full of mourners were seen driving up to Tim Robbins’ 20,000-acre private estate, called “Proletariat Meadows,” in Westchester County. Robbins, who would not speak directly to the AP, did release the following statement on Twitter: “We who struggle in the working class have lost a hero — a man of strong hand, and one of the few who truly realized what a genius I am.”

Read the whole thing, for more reactions from Naomi Campbell, Mike Tyson, Michael Moore, and Alec Baldwin. They’re devastated, and they want you to know it.

When I was younger, I was puzzled why liberals ignored the evils of Communism, then, it hit me, they ignore those evils because Liberals are, in fact junior Communists in training. From Liberal, they devolve to calling themselves Progressive, and eventually, they embrace full-blown Leftism, which is is just another bastard child of Marxism.