Moral retardation? Or Moral destitution? Or maybe just the antics of a truly despicable person who is obsessed with killing babies and mocking Christianity? Stacy McCain has Sarah Silverman at her very worst,
The Daily Caller’s Caroline May caught this on Friday: In a 5-minute video for “Lady Parts Justice” — the pro-abortion group she formed last year with Daily Show producer Lizz Winstead — Sarah Silverman pretends that she was visited by Jesus Christ, who told her to spread a pro-abortion message. Also, Jesus gives Silverman an orgasm:
This kind of pro-abortion fanaticism is always difficult for me to comprehend. It’s hard to imagine anyone could have such a bloodthirsty enthusiasm for killing babies, but it is especially hard to believe womencould harbor this kind of monomaniacal death fetish.
There is a video at the link, but I will spare you that. There is one more thing that describes this video, and Silverman’s history of mocking Christianity. It is boring frankly. Yes, we get it, you do not believe in Christianity so you mock it, wow, talk about not being cutting edge. If Silverman and her ilk REALLY want to be edgy, why don’t they mock Islam? Certainly Sharia Law is much worse on women than Christianity isn’t it? Honor killings, forced marriages, reducing women to little more than property. Yet Silverman remains silent on that. Talk about things that make you go hmmmm. Aleister answers my query
Do I even need to ask why Sarah Silverman never pokes fun at Islam, a faith with a less than perfect record on women’s rights? I’m going to go out on a limb and suggest it’s because people who publicly ridicule Islam have a tendency to turn up dead.
Want to prove you’re really a feminist, Sarah?
Go to Afghanistan and advocate for the right of women to learn to read like Laura Bush did.
Hold a press conference and demand that Obama pay female White House staffers the same as men.
Go to China and speak out against their one child policy, it hasn’t worked out too well for female babies.
Of course, this really is not about women’s rights for Silverman. this is about bashing Western culture and the Christian faith that is such a big part of American culture and heritage. Silverman is a Leftist, and Leftists despise America. America was founded on individual rights, and small government. That is what Silverman and her fellow Leftists truly loathe. To Silverman the truly evil thing is not dictatorships, or Totalitarianism. It is not the trampling of liberties either. After all our liberties come from God, and I think we can see how Silverman thinks about God. No, evil, to the Sarah Silverman’s of the world is Individualism which rejects Leftism and its lies. See, Silverman IS very religious, and her religion is Collectivism. And everything between Left and Right boils down to Collectivism vs Individualism. We know what side Silverman is on don’t we?
The massive fourth branch of government – the administrative state – is officially out of control. Please consider the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, under the direction of the Obama administration, which is now doing the work the Taliban won’t do.
The EEOC is suing Star Transport for rightfully terminating two Muslims who refused to do their job. If these Muslim truck drivers don’t want to deliver alcohol, then they shouldn’t have taken a job in which part of their duties would be to deliver alcohol. It’s that simple.
PEORIA, Ill. – Star Transport, Inc., a trucking company based in Morton, Ill., violated federal law by failing to accommodate two employees because of their religion, Islam, and discharging them, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) charged in a lawsuit filed today.
The lawsuit alleged that Star Transport refused to provide two employees with an accommodation of their religious beliefs when it terminated their employment because they refused to deliver alcohol.
The drivers refused to deliver legal products in America? So where, pray tell, does this end? I suspect the EEOC hasn’t quite figured out where they’ll draw the line on their enforcement of Sharia law:
Alcohol (line already crossed)
• Ham sandwiches?
• Single women on buses?
• Magazines that depict “un-Islamic” images?
• Slot machines and other devices related to gambling?
Perhaps you could contact the Office of the Inspector General of the EEOC and ask them where exactly this line will be drawn.
E-mail Address: firstname.lastname@example.org
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL
P.O BOX 77067
WASHINGTON D.C. 20013-7067
OIG Main Number: 202-663-4327
OIG Fax Number: 202-663-7204
OIG Hotline Number: 800-849-4230
As attorney Mark Levin has frequently observed, we now live in a post-Constitutional Republic.
Via A View From the Beach They also seemed to be protesting all religions, which escapes me. But hey, I can dig anyone, especially a woman, baring all to protest the barbarism of Sharia
Mike Mohamad Agemy was trying to “stop the hate.”
That’s what he told police June 17 after he was arrested for trying to run over a group of Christian fundamentalists who were denouncing Islam in front of the largest mosque in the country, Dearborn’s Islamic Center of America.
A police report obtained under the Freedom of Information Act provides details about the incident that has touched off a firestorm of commentary on right-wing blogs and fanned the notion held by some that Dearborn’s Muslim community is hostile to Christians.
The group Agemy is accused of assaulting is called the “Bible Believers.” Based out of California, they had already been in the news that weekend for their anti-Islam demonstration at the Arab International Festival in East Dearborn. That display, which included a pig’s head on a pike and signs about Islam that many found offensive, led some festival-goers to pelt them with eggs, plastic bottles and reportedly rocks.
This story displays the difference between radical Christians, and radical Muslims. The group demonstrating in front of the mosque are what I might call radical Christians. They, at least in my view, take their religion too far. But, too far for them is carrying “offensive” signs, or maybe burning a Koran. The man who tried to kill them is what I might call a radical Muslim. He, and many other Muslims take their religion too far too. But, instead of carrying “offensive” signs, they KILL people, for simply expressing their opinions. See the difference?
There are other examples, examples the Left refuses to acknowledge. Take how Fundamentalist Christians treat Homosexuality for example. Yes, they say Homosexuals are going to Hell, or that Homosexuality is sinful, and tend to oppose Gay marriage. The Left rails against these Christians. The Left labels them bigots, backwards, hateful, etc. Now, consider how homosexuals are treated under Sharia (Muslim) Law. They are executed! Yes, executed, as in beheaded, hanged, stoned, as in DEAD! See the difference?
How about drinking? Christians discourage drinking to excess, they see it as sinful. But, they pray for those who over indulge. Under Sharia Law, drinking is grounds for lashing, yes, brutal public whippings. Again, can you spot the difference?
Adultery? Christians strongly condemn adultery, with words. Under Sharia Law, adulterers are often executed, maybe they are shot, maybe stoned to death, or maybe they get off “light” by receiving dozens of lashes. And understand that while Christians define adultery as cheating on your spouse, Sharia Law defines it as, well, a woman talking to a man in many instances. Can you spot the difference?
I could go on about the differences between “radical” Christians, and radical Muslims and how they treat gamblers, hint, Christians do not beat gamblers, teens who have sex, hint, Christian nations do not hang 16-year-old girls who have sex from cranes like Iran has been known to do. Christians also do not forbid women from driving, or dressing as they choose, nor do they forbid girls from being educated. Sharia Law, which again, is MUSLIM LAW, does those horrid things. One last time, can you spot the difference?
I understand that many Liberals cannot, or to be more precise will not note the differences. They are too obsessed with their perverse definition of “equality” and moral relativism. They simple refuse to recognize that some cultures are superior to others. They will, however, gladly denounce Christians for opposing Gay marriage. Yet, try to find any Liberal of note denouncing the executions of Gay people, or those even suspected of being Gay in some Muslim nations?
Yes, certainly Liberals will denounce the so-called “war on women” they claim, falsely, I might add, that Republicans are engaged in here in America. Yet, again, try to find the Liberal outrage over how women are treated under Sharia Law. Yes, the Left will gladly denounce the evils of Western Culture, but do they denounce Sharia Law? Cue the crickets chirping.
Leftism and Reality can you spot the difference?
The Astute Bloggers has the right idea!
NINA MASCUNANA – A SINO-FILIPINA/LATINA – IS GUARANTEED NOT HALAL
- SPAIN WAS INVADED ONCE – AND THE JIHADISTS WANT IT BACK.
- PHILIPPINES HAS A HUGE PROBLEM IN THE MOROS ISLANDS.
- AND CHINA HAS A LITTLE WAR GOING ON WITH THE UIGHURS.
WHICH MEANS EVERY SEXY INCH OF NINA MASCUNANA IS UNDER THREAT.
IF YOU WANT HERE AND WOMEN LIKE HER TO BE UNDER CONSTANT THREAT OF FORCED MARRIAGE, WIFE-BEATING, ACID-THROWING AND HONOR-KILLING THEN IGNORE GLOBAL JIHAD.
IF YOU WANT WOMEN LIKE HER TO BE AS FREE AS THEY CHOOSE, THEN JOIN US!
IN OTHER WORDS:
SAY YES TO “SHAKE YOUR BOOTY!” AND SAY NO TO SHEIKH YERBUTI!
And here is the lovely Nina. Just sat HELL NO to radical Islam, and Sharia Law!
OK, as I said previously, I was waiting for all the info on the Herman Cain saga to be revealed. Well, I have seen, and heard, enough! I n fact, I have heard and seen FAR MORE than enough!
Enough bimbo eruptions, enough gold digging skanks, enough of publicity whore Gloria Allred, enough media saturation, enough of BS charges meant not to shine light on injustice, but to destroy the character and political chances of a good man!
There is, as far as I can tell NOTHING behind the charges against Cain, just as there is nothing behind the childish attempts to blame Rick Perry for “leaking” these charges. As I said, I think that Cain is a good man, too good, I would think than to try to destroy the good name of Perry with baseless accusations. Especially while Cain’s own reputation is being trashed!
And ENOUGH of stuff like THIS from Pam Gellar!
Rick Perry? Please. I questioned his very bad judgment when I exposed his entire Islamic curriculum, dawah and proselytizing, to Texas school children. To this day he has never come clean about that. And the fact that he was Al Gore’s manager does not bode well.
Perry is a snake. Watch him. He is creepy. And his freak show speech in New Hampshire recently belonged in a Roger Corman film.
Perry supports Israelas strongly as any other candidate, if not more and makes no bones about it! He would be a great friend to Israel, as his opposition to a Palestnian State suggests. If anyone doubts me, just Google or Bing Rick Perry Israel. See how many Leftists and pro-Palestine nuts are out there demonizing Perry for his stances!
Further, Perry is LOATHED by trial lawyers, abortion rights advocates, gun control zealots, and his Conservative economic policies speak for themselves. Perry is a good man, as is Cain, and if Gellar supports Cain for president, fine. I did too, until his failure to grasp too many foreign policy questions, and his unwarranted attacks on Perry made me go a different direction. What made me switch to Perry was, though, far more about his record, credentials, and policies!
I like Pam Gellar, and support a her efforts to oppose Sharia Law and radical Islam, she is, in many ways, a national hero, but, she is, I would say way off-base where Perry is concerned. And frankly, I will not allow a man I think a great deal of to be maligned unfairly. And to be sure there are some other takes on the school programs Gellar is so upset over and you can find a good one here
Now, can we get back to debating issues, and can the media stop trying to destroy anyone who might unseat Obama, PLEASE! By the way, an exit question, why is it that the media has been gloves off where Romney is concerned?
Two words that will now haunt every freedom-loving Libyan. SHARIA LAW!
The AP reported:
Libya’s transitional leader says Islamic Sharia law will be the “basic source” of all law.
So, no basic liberty, especially for women. God help Libya and Tunisia too
Voting has begun in Tunisia in the first free election of the Arab Spring, nine months after the fall of former President Zinedine el Abidine Ben Ali.
Voters will elect a 217-seat assembly that will draft a new constitution and appoint an interim government.
The much celebrated “Arab Spring” will prove to be nothing but a disaster for the entire region. Just look at where Egypt is headed
(AFP) — An Egyptian court sentenced a man to three years in jail with hard labour on Saturday for insulting Islam in postings on Facebook, the official MENA news agency reported.
The Cairo court found that Ayman Yusef Mansur “intentionally insulted the dignity of the Islamic religion and attacked it with insults and ridicule on Facebook,” the agency reported.
The court said his insults were “aimed at the Noble Koran, the true Islamic religion, the Prophet of Islam and his family and Muslims, in a scurrilous manner,” the agency reported.
It did not provide details on what he had written that was deemed to be offensive.
I have been told that Cain “cannot win”, that he is not a big enough name, etc. Well, I think this nation might just be ready for a leader, not a politician, but a LEADER! And Herman Cain seems to be exactly that!
The Islamic Education Center of Tampa forced out several of its trustees back in 2002. The trustees contested their eviction, and claim they sat down with an Islamic scholar to arbitrate their complaints. The arbitrator ruled in their favor, but the mosque denied this arbitration was properly conducted, and did not accept the decision. The trustees took their case to the Florida courts, which suited the mosque just fine. Control of a substantial amount of funding is at stake.
On March 3, Hillsborough Circuit Judge Richard Nielsen announced that he would decide the case by consulting shari’a law to determine whether the arbitration was conducted properly, and should therefore be binding. Only if his adventure in Islamic scholarship determines the arbitration was invalid will he revert to using Florida civil law to determine the ultimate outcome of the case.
As reported by the St. Petersburg Times, the mosque contested this decision, stating through their attorney that they “believe wholeheartedly in the Koran and its teachings” and “follow Islamic law in connection with their spiritual endeavors,” but they also “believe Florida law should apply in Florida courts.”
It would be fair to note that the mosque evidently feels it has a better chance of winning its case under state law than shari’a, but that doesn’t make their assessment of the situation any less valid.
The Times quotes Neelofer Syed, a Tampa lawyer who gives lectures on Islamic law, who notes that the mosque is a corporation under Florida law, and makes the common-sense observation that “if you live in a country, you are subject to that country’s laws.”
Florida is already considering legislation to ban the use of foreign legal codes in state courts. There’s no question such legislation is urgently needed. This is not just about Islamic law. Judges who fancy themselves enlightened citizens of the world have often cited foreign laws to justify their decisions, all the way up to the Supreme Court. They should all be forbidden from doing so.
Americans don’t get to vote on shaping foreign laws. Their legal and cultural history had no role in defining shari’a. It has absolutely no place in a state or federal court. If two parties wish to voluntarily follow its prescriptions, through mutual consent, that is their business. As soon as it becomes a legal affair under a U.S. judge, Islamic law becomes irrelevant.
There is obviously no mutual consent here, as the mosque has requested judgment in a civil court. They should be obliged, as should any American citizen who makes such a request. There are other Muslim Americans who will seek relief from shari’a through federal and state jurisprudence. The stakes will not always be expressed in dollars.
American judges have no business imposing shari’a on anyone… not even a mosque.
What does moral retardation look like? Like a system of laws based on 7th century evil assbackwardsness!
LAHORE: In another honour-killing incident, a man killed his 35-year-old widowed sister over suspicion of an illicit relation with a man in Ghaziabad. The episode took place on Friday. The woman was taken to a nearby hospital where she succumbed to injuries.
The deceased was identified as Abida Bibi, a mother of three. Police said that the victim’s husband, Zulfiqar, had died some months back after which she was living with her children in a rented house in Shahalam Colony, Street 11, Ghaziabad. staff report
So, you are going to kill a woman based on a possibility she is having sex? What in God’s name do you call such evil? Islamic Law I guess! Islam has many great people in its ranks but Muslims need to face up to the fact that they have a LOT of work to do to reform their faith! again, the sad fact is Islam has a LOT OF work to do! Killing those helping your people? Really? What type of God do you worship that would reward such barbarism?
Mehdi Khorasani, commander of police in the Iranian holy city of Qom, which has a great many mosques and seminaries, has announced that police will impound any car whose occupants are not in compliance with the Islamic dress code, as well as cars transporting dogs, and will launch legal proceedings against their owners.
Whipping a 17-year-old girl like a dog? Lashed 34 times for what?
Reached by phone, Taliban spokesman Muslim Khan claimed responsibility for the flogging. “She came out of her house with another guy who was not her husband, so we must punish her. There are boundaries you cannot cross,” he said. He defended the Taliban’s right to thrash women shoppers who were inappropriately dressed, saying it was permitted under Islamic law.
H/T Michelle Malkin